[Csnd] Random opcodes
| Date | 2014-02-17 20:00 |
| From | mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca |
| Subject | [Csnd] Random opcodes |
What's the difference between the rand/randh/randi family of opcodes and the random/randomh/randomi family of opcodes? They have slightly different syntax, but appear to serve identical purposes. Is one preferable to the other? -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ |
| Date | 2014-02-17 20:05 |
| From | Paul Batchelor |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] Random opcodes |
random* lets you specify specific max/min ranges. -Prand* does values between 0 and 1 On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:00 PM, <mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca> wrote: What's the difference between the rand/randh/randi family of opcodes and |
| Date | 2014-02-17 20:22 |
| From | mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] Random opcodes |
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Paul Batchelor wrote: > random* lets you specify specific max/min ranges. > > rand* does values between 0 and 1 The rand* opcodes also seem to allow adjusting the bounds using the amplitude and offset arguments. But that's what I meant by syntax differences. Are there any more substantive differences, for instance in the PRNG algorithms used? -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ |
| Date | 2014-02-17 20:45 |
| From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: random algorithms |
| Attachments | None |
| Date | 2014-02-17 20:48 |
| From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: random algorithms |
| Attachments | None |