and rand share a seed while tandom may have independent seeds Quoting jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk: > random uses > > #define oneUp31Bit (4.656612875245796924105750827168e-10) > val = (((val* 214013 + 2531011) >> 1) & 0x7fffffff) * oneUp31Bit > > > rand uses one of two algorithms -- selectable > > Original is > #define RNDMUL 15625 > rand *= rndmul; > rand += 1 > > New is > f(z) = (16807 * z) mod (2 ** 31 - 1) > * Based on "Random Number Generators: Good Ones Are Hard to Find", > * S.K. Park and K.W. Miller, Communications of the ACM 31:10 (Oct 1988), > * and "Two Fast Implementations of the 'Minimal Standard' Random > * Number Generator", David G. Carta, Comm. ACM 33, 1 (Jan 1990), p. 87-88 > > I believe rand with new algorithm is high quality > > On some machines you can get true random with urandom > > ==John > Quoting mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca: > >> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Paul Batchelor wrote: >>> random* lets you specify specific max/min ranges. >>> >>> rand* does values between 0 and 1 >> >> The rand* opcodes also seem to allow adjusting the bounds using the >> amplitude and offset arguments. But that's what I meant by syntax >> differences. Are there any more substantive differences, for instance in >> the PRNG algorithms used? >> >> -- >> Matthew Skala >> mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles. >> http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ >> >> >> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers >> csound6: >> https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/ >> csound5: >> https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/ >> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers > csound6: > https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/ > csound5: > https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/ > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound"