Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Cs-dev] Qt is going LGPL

Date2009-01-15 20:39
From"Michael Gogins"
Subject[Cs-dev] Qt is going LGPL
AttachmentsNone  

Date2009-01-15 21:41
FromJonatan Liljedahl
SubjectRe: [Cs-dev] Qt is going LGPL
I would suggest that the "backend" toolkit of the gui opcodes be
modular, or at least a compile-time option, so that one could use FLTK,
Qt, or GTK. (I would be willing to write the support for GTK)

Then perhaps the fltk opcodes should be renamed from FL* to UI* or
something like that. i.e UIslider and UIbutton...

Michael Gogins wrote:
> In March, the Qt graphical user interface toolkit will be licensed
> under the LGPL, just as Csound is, on all platforms, including
> Windows. See: http://www.qtsoftware.com/about/licensing/nokia-adds-lgpl-to-qt-licensing-model.
> 
> This is good news for Csound developers. Qt is probably the best
> windowing toolkit that runs on multiple platforms, and it is almost as
> good as native toolkits such as Microsoft's MFC. If we wanted to, we
> could now replace FLTK with Qt. Developers of graphical Csound
> applications in C or C++ would probably be well advised to use Qt.
> 
> Regards,
> Mike
> 


-- 
/Jonatan         [ http://kymatica.com ]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Date2009-01-15 22:32
Fromjpff
SubjectRe: [Cs-dev] Qt is going LGPL
..except FLTK is easy to use and Qt is not.  At least that is the
experience of myself and students
==John ffitch

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Date2009-01-16 00:04
FromAndres Cabrera
SubjectRe: [Cs-dev] Qt is going LGPL
Personally, I find Qt very intuitive. FLTK is easier, but it's also
much smaller.

Cheers,
Andrés

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:32 PM, jpff  wrote:
> ..except FLTK is easy to use and Qt is not.  At least that is the
> experience of myself and students
> ==John ffitch
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>



-- 


Andrés

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net