I was following this discussion last week with that in mind. Since I've been
out of pocket the last several days,  I'll look at it again. Due to the
number of changes in the next release, and the impending release of the 3.54
code, it may have to wait for the next release.

I will also bring this up with Richard Boulanger (except he's probably been
following this discussion, anyway).

-David.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry McDermott [mailto:T.McDermott@latrobe.edu.au]
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 3:41 AM
> To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: ampdb
> 
> 
> one last word...
> 
> A small discrepancy such as the ampdb description probably should be
> pointed out to the whoever is doing the manual or the csound book proo
> freading...  I think it may be able to be reported to David 
> Boothe... is
> that correct?
> 
> >Anyway, it's clear that the manual is not precise, 
> misleadingly stating that
> >the reference is 90dB = 32000.
> >Even if the deviations are insignificant, as I said, it's 
> always better to
> >have a good idea of how opcodes work and known exactly what 
> to expect.
> >
> It is often the tiniest discrepancies that cause the greatest 
> confusion....
> 
> 
> Terry McDermott
> 
> Music Department
> School of Arts & Media
> Latrobe University
> Bundoora, Victoria, 3083
> Australia
> 
> email: T.McDermott@latrobe.edu.au
> 
> Telephone	+61 3 9479 2167
> Fax		+61 3 9479 3651
>