| > My question is: Does anybody use CScore at all? Would an improved
> version be of general interest, or does everybody use his own score
> generator anyway?
I use cscore all the time. I find it to
be extremely useful. I am sorry to see
that it doesn't work any more (At least
for me with Linux). I have reverted to
a very old version of cscore in order to
use my programs. This is a version which
predates the expansion of the cscore typedef's.
Cscore was broken when the 'dribble_printf'
defs went into an include file.
I would love to see a new version, but I
don't yet speak C++. I usually make very
small, unique programs with cscore that
live their entire lives putting out a score
for a particular part of a particular piece.
Isn't C++ more usefull for complex and hard
to understand module relationships and the like?
Toby,
-There otta be a law- |