Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

Re: Windows Specific flags

Date1998-12-01 12:54
Fromjpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
SubjectRe: Windows Specific flags
Message written at 01 Dec 1998 10:52:01 +0000

May I atempt to explain about the +- flags?  In an e-discussion about
the proliferation of flags in different versions of Csound some of us
decided/discussed using +- for build-specific flags so they would not
confuse the general system.
  We have 2 or 3 PC variants, 2 macintosh, XTC, 2 Linux and a SGI/SUN
to control now.

Date1998-12-01 18:00
FromNicola Bernardini
SubjectRe: Windows Specific flags
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998 jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:

> Message written at 01 Dec 1998 10:52:01 +0000
> 
> May I atempt to explain about the +- flags?  In an e-discussion about
> the proliferation of flags in different versions of Csound some of us
> decided/discussed using +- for build-specific flags so they would not
> confuse the general system.

actually, we were thinking of using the GNU-specific 'long options'
(getopt_long(), which look like --this=that etc.) under Linux to control
linux-specific flags like priority scheduling and the like... It would be
a way for us linuxers not to be in the way of normal flags, while being
able to retain them.
If +- are better (?) supported under windows, linux has adopted
the getopt_long() call and data structure, so it would be better suited.

Nicola
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicola Bernardini
E-mail: nicb@axnet.it
 
Re graphics: A picture is worth 10K words -- but only those to describe
the picture.  Hardly any sets of 10K words can be adequately described
with pictures.