I agree with Richard. Is there is any reason we can't have a few opocdes
that start with i, k, a, or g if it the letter is necessary for the name to
make sense? There surely aren't enough such cases to cause serious
namespace pollution; and if someone happens to name a variable "agogobel"
and gets an error, well, surely there are other names they could use for
that variable.

Terry Cast

Richard Dobson wrote:

> I can't help feeling this might be a name-change too far - I know (more
> or less) what an agogo is , but a gogo must be something (or someone)
> else. If someone makes a 'gamelan' or 'gambang'  opcode, will they have
> to be called 'melan' and 'mbang'?
>
> Richard Dobson
>
> jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
>
> > agogobel renamed gogobel
>
> >
>
> --
> Test your DAW with my Soundcard Attrition Page!
> http://wkweb5.cableinet.co.uk/rwd
> CDP homepage: http://www.bath.ac.uk/~masjpf/CDP/CDP.htm