I have experience with the ADI card (last year's version). It worked quite
well, with a few minor clicks that also can be heard in many Csound scores
(I did not spend a lot of effort trying to get them to go away).  I ran the
board in a Pentium 166, and the realtime performance was about the same as
regular Csound on my new Pentium II 450. If the ADI people have been
tracking host processor performance (I don't know the answer to this), there
should be about a 5X gain in speed over the host processor. If the ADI
people have not been tracking host processor performance, the host processor
will catch up with the DSP chips in about 2 or 3 years since the original
release.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sukandar Kartadinata 
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk 
Date: Monday, March 08, 1999 1:09 PM
Subject: ADI Extended Csound


>Hi everbody, I'm new to this list. My interest in Csound got revived after
>I found out about that PCI card by Analog Devices which is supposed to run
>an extended version of Csound. Has anyone experience/opinions to share ? In
>particular I'm curious if it is possible to transfer the resulting DSP-code
>to a standalone DSP board (like the EZ-KIT) ? Also, how is realtime
>performance on other platforms ?
>
>Thanks,
>Sukandar
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>Sukandar Kartadinata
>Custom Music Technology
>Hagenauerstr. 6, 10435 Berlin, 030-44051219
>http://members.xoom.com/Sukandar/
><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>