Re: Dual or more Pentium's
Date | 1998-04-13 17:58 |
From | Charles Baker |
Subject | Re: Dual or more Pentium's |
About processor/performance ratios: I was told that the performance increase in the SGI O2 line was attributable not so much to processor improvements, but to a radical new board design that kept the memory/processing for a great many system components (video, sound, co-processors, etc.) on the main board, using some sort of unified memory space, thus reducing/eliminating a great many 'bus' accesses and even reducing the time lost in moving data around between different on-board components...(those in the know, is this an accurate picture?) I remember J. Piche posting an impressive message about a substantial increase in the number of oscillators the (then) new O2 could do... perhaps it was due to this new OS design approach, rather than processor 'MIPS'? Please, corrections, clarification, anyone? Charlie -- ********************************************* Charles Baker baker@charlieb.com ********************************************* |
Date | 1998-04-14 16:22 |
From | Micheal Allen Thompson |
Subject | Re: Dual or more Pentium's |
On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Charles Baker wrote: > About processor/performance ratios: > > I was told that the performance increase in the SGI O2 line > > was attributable not so much to processor improvements, but to > > a radical new board design that kept the memory/processing > > for a great many system components (video, sound, co-processors, > > etc.) on the main board, using some sort of unified memory space, > > thus reducing/eliminating a great many 'bus' accesses and even > > reducing the time lost in moving data around between different > > on-board components...(those in the know, is this an accurate > > picture?) yes.... > > I remember J. Piche posting an impressive message about a > > substantial increase in the number of oscillators the (then) > > new O2 could do... perhaps it was due to this new OS design > > approach, rather than processor 'MIPS'? yes nad the O2 will never be a multiprocessor box anyway... so the andvancements were in the memory arch and OS design. I say were cause the O2 is an old (by computer terms) machine. Michael |