Re: entry.c and dynamic linking
| Date | 1998-02-17 12:39 |
| From | jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk |
| Subject | Re: entry.c and dynamic linking |
Message written at 17 Feb 1998 10:05:48 +0000 In-reply-to: <199802160237.CAA26864@hermes> (message from Eli Brandt on Sun, 15 Feb 1998 21:38:55 -0500 (EST)) Eli wrote... > It's always hard to argue when somebody else says they'd like to > rewrite an unmaintainable body of code. :-) While I am happy with the first part, the second is not true. It is maintainable. Not only that but it is modifiable, as has been done over recent years. Personally I would find YACC/LEX more unmaintainable. Yes and i do have to lecture on it next week. ==John ffitch |
| Date | 1998-02-18 01:59 |
| From | Eli Brandt |
| Subject | Re: entry.c and dynamic linking |
jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> > It's always hard to argue when somebody else says they'd like to
> > rewrite an unmaintainable body of code. :-)
>
> While I am happy with the first part, the second is not true. It is
> maintainable. Not only that but it is modifiable, as has been done
> over recent years.
Sorry; I was just going by hearsay. I've never looked outside the
ugen code myself.
--
Eli Brandt | eli+@cs.cmu.edu | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/ |