Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

Re: C++Sound

Date1998-09-13 00:35
Fromnunativs
SubjectRe: C++Sound
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Karpen 
To: Paul Winkler 
Cc: zuijlen@ibm.net ; Csound List 
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: C++Sound


>
>Rick Taube's Lisp-based Common Music is the absolute best event
>processor/score language around. It's a quite remarkable achievement.
>Anyone using Csound who wants a high-level programming language for making
>scores should take the time to learn it. Common Music can output csound
>note lists, midifiles, and a number of other formats for other synthesis
>and sound processing programs (CLM, CMix, RT...). It's great as a tool for
>composing "acoustic" music as well if you're into using computers as an
>aid to composition in general.
>
I absolutely must agree hear that if someone wants a "sequencer" for Csound
you have to check out Common Music.  Though the learning curve is steep like
Csound, and there is a lack of much documentation, it is worth it.  As open
ended and vast as Csound.
Ken Locarnini

Date1998-09-16 19:56
FromNicola Bernardini
SubjectRe: C++Sound
Since everybody is doing that, I'll throw in another bit. Ever heard
of nyquist: fully object oriented, behavioral abstraction of instruments
(i.e. a glissando behaves with rules defined in a given instrument
and differently in another instrument), full communication between
score and orchestra (as a matter of fact there's very little distinction
on it), etc. etc. etc. Coded efficiently, and a lisp-like interpreter
that resembles CM. Obviously free (cela va sans dire).
What do you want more?

Nicola

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicola Bernardini
E-mail: nicb@axnet.it
 
Re graphics: A picture is worth 10K words -- but only those to describe
the picture.  Hardly any sets of 10K words can be adequately described
with pictures.