|
If this interpolation is really better (meaning it sounds better), I'd
consider changing sndwarp to do its interpolations that way.
RK
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999 J.P.Fitch@bath.ac.uk wrote:
> Message written at 4 Jan 1999 16:35:01 +0000
>
> I have added to my experimemtal system a family of opcodes which are
> like oscili except that they use cubic interpolation. If anyone withs
> to experimemt with these I can provide SGI, Linux or PC versions, or
> of course code. I am not totally sure that the code is correct in all
> cases but it seems OK. At present I have called this family oscil3
> for cubic.
>
> Question: should this code replace oscili (assuming it is correct)?
> Wouks you prefer oscil3 to work with non-power-of-2-plus-1 tables?
> That woudl slow it down a bit more.
>
> Question: which other opcodes do you think should use cubic
> interpolation? Adjusting an opcode is not trivial, and certainly is
> much slower. I am willing to do some more opcodes, but I woudl prefer
> a priority order -- or promises that people with do teh adjustments
> AND SEND BACK THE CODE.
>
> Question: is cubic needed? What about using quadratic interpolation?
>
> ==John ff
>
> PS Happy new year
> |