It would be very interesting to see how many lawyers could spot what was
composed/made on Csound and what wasn't. I suppose it would have to have
that Csound kind of 'smell' about it.

                        Per Byrne Villez


>>
>> Following is the copyright from the MIT manual. Is this still the correct
>> copyright? If so, I interpret it to mean that I cannot make publicly
>> available, a modified source distribution (or un-modified, for that
>> matter), without getting permission from MIT. Also, it would seem to
>> prohibit use of Csound for commercial music-making, without permission.
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

On Thu, 27 Feb 1992, Helen Byrne & Per Byrne Villez wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> It would be very interesting to see how many lawyers could spot what was
> composed/made on Csound and what wasn't. I suppose it would have to have
> that Csound kind of 'smell' about it.
> 
>                         Per Byrne Villez
> 

	But that's the beauty of Csound. There is no Csound "smell" or
"sound." An instrument can be implemented in just about any environment,
and other than directly asking the composer what environment a sound was
created in, there is no way of telling.


_____________________________________________________________
Donald J. Ankney	| "For in human Art we are mot merely
ankney@u.washington.edu	| dealing with playthings, however
5106 NE 24th #1		| pleasant or useful they may be,
Seattle, Wa 98105	| but...with a revelation of truth."
(206)729-0423		|			-Hegel