>Michael Gogins wrote :
>
>>MY music is DEFINITELY represented in physical values such as Hz, location
>>in space by angle, phase, and loudness in dB.


1 !dea dzat konta!nz 2 man+e m!nute yet klosel+e relatd partz
2 man+e relat!onz w!th!n relat!onz kannot b projektd !n2 d!skurs!v form.

muzt pr!nc!pall+e b aware ov wast!ng t!me !n such kasez by proceed!ng at random
+ unmethod!kall+e; 4 even though dze solut!on kan often b found w!thout method
+ by luck+e humanz somt!mz qu!kr - yet such procedure = l!kel+e 2 enfeeble
dze fakult!ez + 2 make peopl akkustomed 2 dze tr!fl!ng + dze ch!ld!sh = krude
dze oLd sekuent!al mode ov thought = csound

error !z dze mark ov dze h!gher organ!zm.
l!sten!ng 2 data.

by way ov d!alogue  wh!ch - as not be!ng bound up !n r!g!d observansz ov
mathemat!kl laws
 g!vz plasz altzo 2 d!gress!ons dzat = zomt!mz no lesz kur!ous dzen dze
pr!nc!pl argument

4 50 yearz humanz hav b!n trying 2teach elektron!k c!rku!tz 2 procesz
!nformat!on
!n dze same way humanz alwayz hav.

kepler was suksesful bkauz he d!d not konstra!n dze form ov dze answer.
arrang!ng data 1zt one way dzen an other totall+e un!nh!b!td.

2 descartes as 2 newton kepler.z approach was not thought at all. !t waz
zomth!ng !nfer!or 2 thought zomth!ng down at  dze level ov mere guess!ng.
onl+e at dze end ov dze 20th century !z !t bkom!ng klear dzat kepler.z
method = > useful than thought. !t kan go where thought al+1 kannot.


!t = 2 destro! dze tendenss+e 2wardz klass!kl + neoklass!kl eku!l!br!um + 2
kreate
1 new d!seku!l!br!um - 2 engage !n dze procesz ov kreat!v deztrukt!on
- dzat = dze role ass!gned 2 dze !nnovatorz !n dze b!t soc!et+e.

b!t evolut!on w!ll kom s!lentl+e - !n zoftkode.


>I abhor MIDI for it's obvious stupidity /crudeness

detailed parameters = stupidity /crudeness = human thought

>and I'm curious about
>how others have fared in
>composing with detailed parameters in floats,etc. and using what
>tools.

max