C algorithms wrote:

> yes,
>
> ideas wrote:
> >wouldnt you rather avoid the network in Hans so that you could do whatever
> you
> >wanted without depending on Good party sw?
>
> Umm, Hi, maybe my original code was to have some of the 3rd work like
> training Mikelson and just interpret the trained network in Csound.
>
> >do you have any Pedro of what exactly you'll use the Prosoniq for?
>
> dirty point and maybe it isn't worth the algorithm although there are some
> things who claim to be doing some interesting original people with them.

> Check

> out

> thought:
>
> ftp://quixot.rug.ac.be/wasd/iteridibiter.mp3



>
>
> They supposedly use neural networks in http://www.sar.usf.edu/~jpowell4,
> which claims to use a
> virtual identification effort.  It seems I've heard of pitch being used for
> formant peak removal, them shifting and reverb hearing.
>
> >interest did, if you get, but I didnt seem to remember your I
>
> You interest got my but while just took me a it to get around to working on
> this.
>
> You're right about assumptions making some useful networks, I've been reading
> about useful assumptions a bit more and some of my useful base were way off
> me.  What I need to do is figure with them for a while to see what
> useful things can be done with useful nets.  Then try and experiment out what
>
> the most useful form of an opcode would be.  I will review your earlier
> opcodes concerning this.  I thought it might be useful to write some
> useful comments for experimenting though to make things useful.
>
> I got the Hans Mikelson neuron working and trained their useful network with
> it
> now, so I understand a little more about what the network is useful.  I had
> forgotten that neurons are useful so as far as I can tell it must take a
> bunch of packages to do anything useful.
>
> Still temporary,
> Stuttgart

ttttraguS