| My SSDir has been solved by removing spaces in exe.bat statement.
Thanks to all of you who helped!
Jose Halac
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20509;
1 Feb 99 4:52 GMT
Received: from [129.15.2.121] (helo=hermes.services.ou.edu)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107BLU-0000Rz-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 04:52:25 +0000
Received: from styx.services.ou.edu by hermes.services.ou.edu with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:52:08 -0600
Received: from ou.edu (cate1-83.reshall.ou.edu [129.15.141.83])
by styx.services.ou.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA01866;
Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:52:04 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <36B532F7.ECE0325A@ou.edu>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:52:08 -0600
From: Terry Cast
Reply-To: terrycast-1@ou.edu
Organization: The University of Oklahoma
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,de-DE,fr-FR
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Pitchbend
References:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Please excuse me for taking so long to reply, I have been too busy to get
to it this week.
The following orchestra works fine with DirectCsound 2.5 and 2.6 (on
Windows 95), but produces only a steadily pitched tone with Consound 3.51
and Winsound 3.51 (the test MIDI file is just one long note, during which
I added some pitchbending--I can send the MIDI file by attachment to the
list or directly to you if you would like to see it).
sr=44100
kr=4410
nchnls=1
instr 1
kpch pchmidib 12
asig oscil 10000, cpspch(kpch), 1
out asig
endin
;score
f1 0 4096 10 1
f0 25
This next orchestra (with same score and MIDI file, all of the versions of
Csound listed above) results in a jump of several octaves in pitch each
time there is a new pitchbend message. Am I doing something wrong (I
wouldn't be surprised)? Is pchbend supposed to work this way?
sr=44100
kr=4410
nchnls=1
instr 1
ipch pchmidi ; translate MIDI note number to pch
kbend pchbend 4 ; get pitchbend messages and scale them to range of 0
through 4
kpch = ipch + (kbend-2) ; shift pch value of note by value of kbend (range
of -2 through 2)
asig oscil 10000, cpspch(kpch), 1
out asig
endin
I hope this at least partly answers your question.
Terry Cast
jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> Message written at 24 Jan 1999 17:05:15 +0000
>
> On 15 Dec 1998 I sent a message saying that I thought I was on the
> track of a screw-up in pitchbend. The revised code was in v3.50 but
> so far I have not heard from anyone that it either does or does not
> work. If you have any experience to offer with respect to bending for
> v3.50 or later, I would like to hear -- positive or negative.
> ==John ffitch
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20517;
1 Feb 99 4:55 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107BOH-0000SC-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 04:55:17 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (EAA16144); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 04:52:39 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 04:52:28 GMT
Received: from hermes.services.ou.edu [129.15.2.121] by hermes via ESMTP (EAA17577); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 04:52:26 GMT
Received: from styx.services.ou.edu by hermes.services.ou.edu with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:52:08 -0600
Received: from ou.edu (cate1-83.reshall.ou.edu [129.15.141.83])
by styx.services.ou.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA01866;
Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:52:04 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <36B532F7.ECE0325A@ou.edu>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:52:08 -0600
From: Terry Cast
Reply-To: terrycast-1@ou.edu
Organization: The University of Oklahoma
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,de-DE,fr-FR
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Pitchbend
References:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Please excuse me for taking so long to reply, I have been too busy to get
to it this week.
The following orchestra works fine with DirectCsound 2.5 and 2.6 (on
Windows 95), but produces only a steadily pitched tone with Consound 3.51
and Winsound 3.51 (the test MIDI file is just one long note, during which
I added some pitchbending--I can send the MIDI file by attachment to the
list or directly to you if you would like to see it).
sr=44100
kr=4410
nchnls=1
instr 1
kpch pchmidib 12
asig oscil 10000, cpspch(kpch), 1
out asig
endin
;score
f1 0 4096 10 1
f0 25
This next orchestra (with same score and MIDI file, all of the versions of
Csound listed above) results in a jump of several octaves in pitch each
time there is a new pitchbend message. Am I doing something wrong (I
wouldn't be surprised)? Is pchbend supposed to work this way?
sr=44100
kr=4410
nchnls=1
instr 1
ipch pchmidi ; translate MIDI note number to pch
kbend pchbend 4 ; get pitchbend messages and scale them to range of 0
through 4
kpch = ipch + (kbend-2) ; shift pch value of note by value of kbend (range
of -2 through 2)
asig oscil 10000, cpspch(kpch), 1
out asig
endin
I hope this at least partly answers your question.
Terry Cast
jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> Message written at 24 Jan 1999 17:05:15 +0000
>
> On 15 Dec 1998 I sent a message saying that I thought I was on the
> track of a screw-up in pitchbend. The revised code was in v3.50 but
> so far I have not heard from anyone that it either does or does not
> work. If you have any experience to offer with respect to bending for
> v3.50 or later, I would like to hear -- positive or negative.
> ==John ffitch
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20626;
1 Feb 99 6:27 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107CpU-0000Zz-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 06:27:28 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (GAA05291); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 06:26:41 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 06:26:29 GMT
Received: from root@mail.pclink.com [204.72.134.12] by hermes via ESMTP (GAA18540); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 06:26:27 GMT
Received: from robertsc (pm7-44 [206.11.2.180])
by pclink.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with SMTP id AAA30051
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 00:26:24 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990201002835.007b0800@pclink.com>
X-Sender: schrepel@pclink.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 00:28:35 -0600
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Robert Schrepel
Subject: Csound in live performance
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Csounders,
It recently occured to me that I see no list discussion of using Csound
as a tool in live performance. I've been considering the possibility of
doing just that. I have my doubts about it, and as I ponder I thought
I'd ask a few questions of those who use Csound in this way (are there any
out there who do?) I'm especially interested in examples of "regular"
usage of Csound in a live rig, as opposed to special one-off computer music
showcases. Here are a few questions off the top of my head, but general
comments are certainly welcome.
-- Setting up Csound in this way is quite a bit of work compared to
plugging in a hardware synth. What made it worth it to you?
-- What role does it play in your setup (synthesis, sampling, complex
control sequences, realtime effects processing...)?
-- I fear that reliability would be an issue. Any stories of spectacular
crashes?
-- What platform/machine do you use (had to throw that one in )?
My interest in Csound decreased as my interest in live performance
increased. Realtime operation seems to be more viable these days,
though, so I'm hoping some of you early adopters will shed some
light on its pitfalls and rewards.
Thanks,
Robert Schrepel
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20701;
1 Feb 99 8:04 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107EKy-0000E5-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:04:05 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA00973); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:01:21 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:01:09 GMT
Received: from falcon.glas.apc.org [193.124.5.54] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA17092); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:01:08 GMT
Received: from mail.glas.apc.org([193.124.5.37]) (1293 bytes) by falcon.glas.apc.org
via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:inet_hosts/T:inet_zone_smtp
(sender: )
id
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:01:06 +0300 (WSU)
(Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #2 built 1998-Nov-27)
Received: from default(src addr [194.154.81.150]) (906 bytes) by mail.glas.apc.org
via sendmail with P\:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp
(sender: )
id
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:00:55 +0300 (WSU)
(Smail-3.2.0.96 1997-Jun-2 #11 built DST-Aug-25)
Message-Id:
From: Sergey Batov
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at UK.AC.Bath.maths.omphalos
Subject: Re: Simple question: a pitch of audio sample.
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:00:44 +0300
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
It was my question and seems I found something about it.
There is a little program Wave to Note 1.1 for Win95.
Home page:
http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/~hlorenz/waveton.html
Downloads:
ftp://ftp.freeware.ru/pub/mycomputer/multimedia/waveton1.zip
http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/~hlorenz/waveton1.zip
Also Sound Forge can (tries at least) do it. (Tools -> Spectrum Analysis:
Prominent Frequency)
Regards,
Sergey Batov batov@glasnet.ru
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20742;
1 Feb 99 8:29 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107Ejm-0000fO-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:29:42 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA02852); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:28:43 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:28:30 GMT
Received: from falcon.glas.apc.org [193.124.5.54] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA12664); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:28:29 GMT
Received: from mail.glas.apc.org([193.124.5.37]) (2937 bytes) by falcon.glas.apc.org
via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:inet_hosts/T:inet_zone_smtp
(sender: )
id
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:28:31 +0300 (WSU)
(Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #2 built 1998-Nov-27)
Received: from default(src addr [194.154.81.150]) (2561 bytes) by mail.glas.apc.org
via sendmail with P\:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp
(sender: )
id
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:28:17 +0300 (WSU)
(Smail-3.2.0.96 1997-Jun-2 #11 built DST-Aug-25)
Message-Id:
From: Sergey Batov
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at UK.AC.Bath.maths.omphalos
Subject: Re: Csound in live performance
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:29:06 +0300
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id IAA12664
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi!
I'd like to add some more questions here.
It's clear that DirectCsound provide a good possibilities for interactive
music.
My idea is to use a realtime Wave In (playing on saxophone) and to get so=
me
more or less predictable (of course, surprises possible for performer but
not for programmer or composer :-) ) sounding result (say "melody" playe=
d
by one of simple Csound
instruments). I'm not so sophisticated in opcodes so I need some hints
about analysis
of realtime Wave In signal, something simple (I even not think about pitc=
h
recognizing).
It may be response to duration or amplitude of note.
Regards,
Sergey Batov batov@glasnet.ru=20
----------
> =EF=D4: Robert Schrepel
> =EB=CF=CD=D5: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
> =F4=C5=CD=C1: Csound in live performance
> =E4=C1=D4=C1: 1 =C6=C5=D7=D2=C1=CC=D1 1999 =C7. 9:28
>=20
> Csounders,
>=20
> It recently occured to me that I see no list discussion of using Csound=
=20
> as a tool in live performance. I've been considering the possibility o=
f=20
> doing just that. I have my doubts about it, and as I ponder I thought=20
> I'd ask a few questions of those who use Csound in this way (are there
any=20
> out there who do?) I'm especially interested in examples of "regular"=20
> usage of Csound in a live rig, as opposed to special one-off computer
music=20
> showcases. Here are a few questions off the top of my head, but genera=
l=20
> comments are certainly welcome.
>=20
> -- Setting up Csound in this way is quite a bit of work compared to=20
> plugging in a hardware synth. What made it worth it to you?
>=20
> -- What role does it play in your setup (synthesis, sampling, complex=20
> control sequences, realtime effects processing...)?
>=20
> -- I fear that reliability would be an issue. Any stories of spectacul=
ar
> crashes? =20
>=20
> -- What platform/machine do you use (had to throw that one in )?
>=20
> My interest in Csound decreased as my interest in live performance=20
> increased. Realtime operation seems to be more viable these days,=20
> though, so I'm hoping some of you early adopters will shed some=20
> light on its pitfalls and rewards.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Robert Schrepel
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20750;
1 Feb 99 8:30 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107EkC-0000FA-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:30:08 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA08926); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:29:12 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:29:00 GMT
Received: from falcon.glas.apc.org [193.124.5.54] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA00985); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:28:58 GMT
Received: from mail.glas.apc.org([193.124.5.37]) (2937 bytes) by falcon.glas.apc.org
via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:inet_hosts/T:inet_zone_smtp
(sender: )
id
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:29:00 +0300 (WSU)
(Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #2 built 1998-Nov-27)
Received: from default(src addr [194.154.81.150]) (2561 bytes) by mail.glas.apc.org
via sendmail with P\:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp
(sender: )
id
for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:28:52 +0300 (WSU)
(Smail-3.2.0.96 1997-Jun-2 #11 built DST-Aug-25)
Message-Id:
From: Sergey Batov
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at UK.AC.Bath.maths.omphalos
Subject: Re: Csound in live performance
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:29:06 +0300
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id IAA00985
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi!
I'd like to add some more questions here.
It's clear that DirectCsound provide a good possibilities for interactive
music.
My idea is to use a realtime Wave In (playing on saxophone) and to get so=
me
more or less predictable (of course, surprises possible for performer but
not for programmer or composer :-) ) sounding result (say "melody" playe=
d
by one of simple Csound
instruments). I'm not so sophisticated in opcodes so I need some hints
about analysis
of realtime Wave In signal, something simple (I even not think about pitc=
h
recognizing).
It may be response to duration or amplitude of note.
Regards,
Sergey Batov batov@glasnet.ru=20
----------
> =EF=D4: Robert Schrepel
> =EB=CF=CD=D5: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
> =F4=C5=CD=C1: Csound in live performance
> =E4=C1=D4=C1: 1 =C6=C5=D7=D2=C1=CC=D1 1999 =C7. 9:28
>=20
> Csounders,
>=20
> It recently occured to me that I see no list discussion of using Csound=
=20
> as a tool in live performance. I've been considering the possibility o=
f=20
> doing just that. I have my doubts about it, and as I ponder I thought=20
> I'd ask a few questions of those who use Csound in this way (are there
any=20
> out there who do?) I'm especially interested in examples of "regular"=20
> usage of Csound in a live rig, as opposed to special one-off computer
music=20
> showcases. Here are a few questions off the top of my head, but genera=
l=20
> comments are certainly welcome.
>=20
> -- Setting up Csound in this way is quite a bit of work compared to=20
> plugging in a hardware synth. What made it worth it to you?
>=20
> -- What role does it play in your setup (synthesis, sampling, complex=20
> control sequences, realtime effects processing...)?
>=20
> -- I fear that reliability would be an issue. Any stories of spectacul=
ar
> crashes? =20
>=20
> -- What platform/machine do you use (had to throw that one in )?
>=20
> My interest in Csound decreased as my interest in live performance=20
> increased. Realtime operation seems to be more viable these days,=20
> though, so I'm hoping some of you early adopters will shed some=20
> light on its pitfalls and rewards.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Robert Schrepel
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20764;
1 Feb 99 8:37 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107ErO-0000Fd-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:37:34 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA11901); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:36:02 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:35:48 GMT
Received: from renoir.mailpac.pt [194.65.21.2] by hermes via SMTP (IAA15638); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:35:46 GMT
Received: by renoir.mailpac.pt (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id IAA18231; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:34:10 GMT
Date: 1 Feb 99 08:34 GMT
X400-Received: by /ADMD=mailpac/C=pt/;
Relayed; 1 Feb 99 08:34 GMT
X400-Received: by /PRMD=gtw-ms/ADMD=mailpac/C=pt/;
Relayed; 1 Feb 99 08:34 GMT
Priority: normal
P1-Message-ID: pt*mailpac*gtw-ms;36b56702473300mailpac92
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
MIME-version: 1.0
From: Pedro Batista
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Message-ID: <36b56702473301mailpac92*@mailpac.pt>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Fwd:_=3B97x97?=
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
>Dear Pedro,
>
>please don't forward these antiorp-mails, until you know, what it contains.
>If you're not sure, because it contains information in several languages,
>please so kind to trash it!
Since some persons complained to me about this fwd, please let me explain
that
1) this was an isolated ocasion; i just figured once would be all right
2) I believe Ive always stayed on focus on csound here, so half a K or so of
unrelated stuff wouldnt be too much
3) it was my belief that people were aware of antiorp's activities, and
would be sort of 'prepared' (if anyone can ever be)
anyway, sorry for the inconvenience;
it was careless of me and wont happen again
pedro
ps. that said, lets all groove on to the joys of internet and free speech
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21027;
1 Feb 99 8:53 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107F6M-0000GL-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:53:02 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA12198); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:50 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:37 GMT
Received: from exim@wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk [138.38.100.104] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA08713); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:36 GMT
Received: from [138.38.99.25] (helo=maths.Bath.AC.UK ident=mmdf)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
id 107F4y-0000gq-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:36 +0000
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 99 8:51:36 GMT
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: .CSD Files & Winsound
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Message-Id:
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Message written at 31 Jan 1999 21:40:22 +0000
--- Copy of mail to tropistic@mindspring.com ---
In-reply-to: <36B34EAC.B45D4B36@mindspring.com> (message from Jay Chernick on
Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:25:48 -0800)
References: <36B34EAC.B45D4B36@mindspring.com>
With winsound if you have a blank score field and the orchestra field
is a .csd file then it does approx what you want. Works for me....
==John ffitch
>>>>> "Jay" == Jay Chernick writes:
Jay> A simple question:
Jay> syntax of the .csd file aside, how (can?) a .csd file be used with
Jay> Winsound?
Jay> Jay
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21056;
1 Feb 99 8:53 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107F6e-0000hL-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:53:20 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA01817); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:27 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:11 GMT
Received: from exim@wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk [138.38.100.104] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA06533); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:10 GMT
Received: from [138.38.99.25] (helo=maths.Bath.AC.UK ident=mmdf)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
id 107F4Y-0000gg-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:51:10 +0000
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 99 8:51:09 GMT
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Further bugs I found
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Message-Id:
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Message written at 31 Jan 1999 21:27:17 +0000
--- Copy of mail to huber@iamexwi.unibe.ch ---
There was a bug in wgflute which showed if the optional last argument
was omitted. I have fixed it in my sources.
Thanks for highlighting this example of brain-failure!
==John ffitch
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21086;
1 Feb 99 8:53 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107F7C-0000Gc-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:53:54 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA13276); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:52:37 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:52:25 GMT
Received: from exim@wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk [138.38.100.104] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA14001); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:52:24 GMT
Received: from [138.38.99.25] (helo=maths.Bath.AC.UK ident=mmdf)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
id 107F5k-0000h4-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:52:24 +0000
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 99 8:52:23 GMT
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: command line or CsOptions
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Message-Id:
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Message written at 31 Jan 1999 21:59:15 +0000
--- Copy of mail to kaeru@flash.net ---
In-reply-to: <36B22566.B05629A5@flash.net> (message from pete moss on Fri, 29
Jan 1999 15:17:26 -0600)
References: <36B22566.B05629A5@flash.net>
At present in my code the order of processing is
1) .csound.rc
2) command line
3) CsOptions in a .csd file
The last one wins.
==John ffitch
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21264;
1 Feb 99 8:58 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107FC1-0000Gx-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:58:53 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (IAA03142); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:57:07 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:56:39 GMT
Received: from exim@wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk [138.38.100.104] by hermes via ESMTP (IAA05615); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:56:39 GMT
Received: from [138.38.99.25] (helo=maths.Bath.AC.UK ident=mmdf)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
id 107F9q-0000hj-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:56:38 +0000
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 99 8:56:37 GMT
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Subject: mini release
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Message-Id:
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Message written at 1 Feb 1999 07:20:25 +0000
I have just placed code and sources for version 3.511 onto the
server. This is a collection of small but significant bug fixes.
arate ^ constant corrected
Noise error in spectrun fixed (2pi was wrong)
sndwarp fix for some platforms
New diskin fix
ADSR fixed in midi case
wgflute fixed
distort1 now compiled correctly (gave a spurious null iopadr mesage)
cpsmidip etc in k-rate case fixed
More on pitchbend
and, two large internal reorganisations (for those who care about
sources)
1: the whole mess of pi, twopi and clashes with some compilers has
been changed, using a set of macros
2: rtaudio.c has been split into rtSGI, rtSUN, rtmacintosh etc to make
the code easier to read for those who do not like conditional
compilation, and to encourage maintainable platform-dependent RTAUDIO
At present Windows, Console and MSDOS and SGI versions are on the
server. SUN should follow soon. 68K overnight I guess.
I still have a collection of bug reports, but I wanted to clear these
as teaching starts today in 2 hrs
==John ff
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22465;
1 Feb 99 12:15 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 107IGP-00011X-00; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 12:15:37 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (MAA11350); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 12:03:03 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 12:02:43 GMT
Received: from agora.stm.it [195.62.32.1] by hermes via ESMTP (MAA12386); Mon, 1 Feb 1999 12:02:40 GMT
Received: from agora.stm.it (ppp01-02.dial-access.stm.it [195.62.37.2]) by agora.stm.it (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA01592 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 13:02:33 +0100 (ITA)
Message-ID: <36B58F5A.477F3949@agora.stm.it>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 12:26:18 +0100
From: Gabriel Maldonado
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Csound Mailing List
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] DirectCsound 2.6 available
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi all,
the 2.6 version is now available on my site for download:
http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/download.htm
these are the new features:
1) new score opcodes: { } (nested loops), F (score table creation)
2) new score macro arithmetic operators: T (score table access), R (random numbers), ^
(power), % (modulus)
3) Nested macros. The syntax of macros with arguments has changed a bit: now comma
character must be used in order to separate arguments instead of '#' character .
4) During each csound session a file named orc.srt containing orchestra macro expansions
is created, in order to find bugs when using macros.
5) New orc opcodes: resony
6) some bugs fixed
7) synchronized with 3.51 canonical version
HAPPY DOWNLOADING!
--
Gabriel Maldonado
http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/home2.htm
|