| An excellent book is "Introductory Signal Processing with Computer
Applications" by P. A. Lynn and Wolfgang Fuerst, published byWiley. It
makes the unspoken assumption that the reader doesn't have a great
mathematical ability ( I'm at idiot level) and gradually introduces the
necessary maths. It comes with a floppy of all the examples in both C and
Pascal. If you can manage basic trig then this book is for you.
>Hans Mikelson wrote, in response to my statement
>that I needed to know more "calculus" to deal with DSP and filtering:
>
>> I don't think Calculus is absolutely required for digital filter theory. If
>> you know the equations for the frequency response you can get by with
>> algebra. It would also help to understand some complex variable theory for
>> doing the Z-transform.
>
>Probably "calculus" is the wrong term for what Hans more clearly
>describes. Whatever this stuff is, I need to know more of it - and
>since I last studied maths in 1972, I need to get on the case.
>
>Algebra, sines, cosines etc. I am fine with. In addition to
>thise, there are some reasonably daunting looking formulae,
>involving, to the best of my understanding:
>
>1 - Integrating the results of the equation over a range of values of
> one or more of its variables. (Isn't this calculus?)
>
>2 - Equations which deal with two totally separate things at once:
> a "real" thing, and an "imaginary" thing.
>
> The imaginary thing is sometimes or always couched in terms of
> the square-root of -1, which does not exist, and this prevents it
> being converted into an ordinary number and mixed up with the
> real stuff.
>
>This "real" and "imaginary" stuff is known as "complex" variable
>theory. I used to work at a tech college, and often saw a room full
>of elecronic students and a teacher hammering away with scientific
>calculators and a white-board full of formulae. So far, I have never
>needed to know this stuff, and I always thought it was lopsided that
>they were forced to know this stuff, yet most of them would have been
>unable to tell me what a BC107 was, or which lead was its emitter,
>base and collector.
>
>
>If you sense the evident gaps in my knowledge, and can recommend some
>reading for me, I would *really* appreciate it!
>
>- Robin
>
>===============================================================
>
>Robin Whittle rw@firstpr.com.au http://www.firstpr.com.au
> Heidelberg Heights, Melbourne, Australia
>
>First Principles Research and expression: music, Internet
> music marketing, telecommunications, human
> factors in technology adoption. Consumer
> advocacy in telecommunications, especially
> privacy. Consulting and technical writing.
>
>Real World Electronics and software for music: eg.
>Interfaces the Devil Fish mods for the TB-303.
>
>===============================================================
|