Richard Dobson wrote:
>Csound is the kernel underwriting all the posts to the list

I agree with this.  I think the reason the list ranges so widely in topic
matter and no one complains, is that Csounders have such wide interests and
people can relate almost any topic to Csound one way or another.

Hans Mikelson

	Yes. Upon reviewing my csound mailbox, I think it's perfectly valid as a
csound resource. There is a certain amount of 'noise'; but it always stems
somehow from csound or DSP somehow. I consider someone like "=cw4tFabs" or
whatever a general nuisance, but far less bothersome than the counterpart
role on many other lists. Besides, there's always the Delete key. Or
Ctrl-D. Or whatever....
	And if it were no longer a csound list, there would be NO central csound
community for information central to the code itself and the latest
developments.

								

At 09:00 AM 5/16/98 -0500, Hans Mikelson wrote:
>Richard Dobson wrote:
>>Csound is the kernel underwriting all the posts to the list
>
>I agree with this.  I think the reason the list ranges so widely in topic
>matter and no one complains, is that Csounders have such wide interests and
>people can relate almost any topic to Csound one way or another.
>
>Hans Mikelson
>
>
>
>

	thank you for your bandwidth