Um, well, it was a calculated risk, I know! I'll stick to strictly
Csound stuff in future, I promise!

However, the original topic was about commandline programs, so that was
what I was mostly writing about.  And the ultimate point was that,
despite the fact I have made a commandline reverb, or two, as mentioned
in the original post, my ultimate point really was that Csound is still
probably the better environment for developing and using a
'fully-configurable' reverb.

And, yes, I have no idea how my post can be interpreted as a Windows
Nnix war!
But if you seek a war, there are plenty around - and nobody ever wins!



Richard Dobson

Ed Hall wrote:
> 
> > Oh no, not the Windows Unix war again.................
> 
> No, but I don't exactly think the Csound list is where someone should be
> pushing a £335 commercial product, whatever the author's connections.
> "Golden opportunity" indeed!
> 
>                 -Ed

-- 
Test your DAW with my Soundcard Attrition Page!
http://wkweb5.cableinet.co.uk/rwd

If you'd like to contribute the algorithms (or code) I'm sure someone
on the list would be happy to opcodify it.  Csound sorely lacks a good,
configurable reverb!  My only worry is that a complex configuration
mechanism might wind up adding yet another oddball file format to
Csound (even if it's based on something like XML).

As for OS wars, source code makes them irrelevant, one of the very nice
things about Csound...

		-Ed