Richard Dobson wrote:

> I I like to have more than one way of doing things. Csound offers
> several ways of
> doing most things - why not convolution too?
> It has educational value (eg reproduce the Moorer experiments)
> I'm not convinced that there are no side effects using the FFT
> approach - how can I
> find
> out other than by trying both?
> maybe I don't just want to apply reverb, but some arbitrary
> transformation where I
> can
> have control over sample amplitudes.
> Modern PCs are fast enough to make it reasonable.
>

In what kind of things other than reverbs can convolution be useful?
What types of convolution are theorized at present time? In what way is
convolve opcode limited?  I'm very interested.


--
Gabriel Maldonado

mailto:g.maldonado@agora.stm.it
http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/home2.htm
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Way/7041/home2.htm