Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

Re: midifile evaluation problem

Date1998-08-25 15:39
Fromjpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
SubjectRe: midifile evaluation problem
Message written at 25 Aug 1998 08:48:08 -0400
--- Copy of mail to nicb@axnet.it ---

I have made those changes in my sources as well.

Date1998-08-26 07:33
FromNicola Bernardini
SubjectRe: several messages
On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, James Croson wrote:

> Nicola,
> re:
> !             tickspersec = Qticks * 2;
> 
> I just happened to have looked at this on Friday. I
> do not know why the tempo is halved in cs3484, but
> the above line is the same as cs347 and tempo was
> fine in that version.

On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:

> Message written at 25 Aug 1998 08:48:08 -0400
> --- Copy of mail to nicb@axnet.it ---
> 
> I have made those changes in my sources as well.
> ==John ffitch

Thank you John to have incorporated those changes. Unfortunately, James
is right: the Qticks * 2 is correct. I was mislead by the fact that I
had a midifile which was rendered by midi2cs at 60 bpm while it was
supposed to be at 120 bpm (a bug in midi2cs???). Also Dave Phillips reported
that without the Qticks * 2, the midifile was running at half-speed.
So, I ended up putting the Qticks * 2 back... Sorry about that :)

Nicola

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicola Bernardini
E-mail: nicb@axnet.it
 
Re graphics: A picture is worth 10K words -- but only those to describe
the picture.  Hardly any sets of 10K words can be adequately described
with pictures.