J P Fitch wrote:
> 
> Is there any reason why [peak/peakk] are not both called peak 

Not at all in my opinion. Quite a few of the more recent
opcodes have been unnecessarily split by type.

Opcode writers, look at the pile of existing ugens to see how to
make your code handle i/a/k-rate arguments transparently
to the end-users!

(and of course, thanks for all your hard work!!)


Cheers,