| hello i'm sorry to ask another general qusetion
but my main concern is this. I have many people tell
me that linux in a much more robust OS than win98 , and I know this to be true but I was wondering if there
is a substantial increase with performance running
csound or directcsound under linux. Just wondering
if linux is a better OS for trying to do real time synthesis with csound?
does anywone have any feedback?
thanks,
-------------------------------
Beam to http://www.StarTrek.com
Now featuring the Star Trek Store and
the official site for Star Trek: Insurrection.
------------------------------
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00775;
16 Feb 99 18:02 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 10CoBh-0007Kc-00; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:21:33 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (RAA11290); Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:07:51 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:07:29 GMT
Received: from neptune.lyrick.com [38.227.100.46] by hermes via ESMTP (RAA13772); Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:07:28 GMT
Received: by neptune.lyrick.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
id <1MN9CV6L>; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:04:20 -0600
Message-ID: <283AABB8FD0DD21187C200A0C995F5DE0ECE52@neptune.lyrick.com>
From: David Boothe
To: "Csound (E-mail)"
Subject: score.srt file
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:04:18 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Must the score.srt file always be written in the same directory as the
Csound executable, or is there a way to redirect it under Linux? In other
words, do all (Linux)users need read/write access to the directory where
Csound is located?
Thanks in advance, and forgive my Linux ignorance.
-David.
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00957;
16 Feb 99 18:38 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 10CpNh-0007XG-00; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:38:01 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA11105); Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:18:13 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:17:58 GMT
Received: from root@big.fishnet.net [204.89.144.3] by hermes via ESMTP (SAA11996); Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:17:52 GMT
Received: from rcsreg.com (x214.core.fishnet.net [204.89.144.214])
by big.fishnet.net (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA11617
for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 10:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <36C9B64B.BD2BF8E2@rcsreg.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:17:47 +0000
From: Tobiah
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.0-final i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Csound (E-mail)"
Subject: Re: score.srt file
References: <283AABB8FD0DD21187C200A0C995F5DE0ECE52@neptune.lyrick.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
My score.srt file always get written to my current
working directory; the one that I invoked csound from.
Is this not the same for you?
While we are on the topic of score.srt, I have
an Idea/Request on the subject.
I enjoy writing really big score files, often
with thousands of notes. When they get very
large, the time that it takes csound to sort
into score.srt becomes larger then negligible.
I was thinking that it would be really nice if
csound could check the time stamps on the score
and score.srt files, to see whether re-sorting
is necessary. This way, adjustments to the
orchestra would not necessitate a re-sorting
of the score.
Toby
David Boothe wrote:
>
> Must the score.srt file always be written in the same directory as the
> Csound executable, or is there a way to redirect it under Linux? In other
> words, do all (Linux)users need read/write access to the directory where
> Csound is located?
>
> Thanks in advance, and forgive my Linux ignorance.
>
> -David.
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa01336;
16 Feb 99 22:29 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 10Ct01-0006hR-00; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:29:49 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (WAA15811); Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:28:08 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:27:58 GMT
Received: from root@lix.intercom.es [194.179.21.2] by hermes via ESMTP (WAA17517); Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:27:55 GMT
Received: from intercom.es (iv2-241.intercom.es [195.76.206.241]) by lix.intercom.es (8.7.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA28597; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 23:25:58 +0100
Message-ID: <36C87624.8E271A35@intercom.es>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 20:31:49 +0100
From: Josep M Comajuncosas
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: terrycast-1@ou.edu
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Csound as a preset library
References: <36C84581.4F7D7F87@intercom.es> <36C85498.B21E0AC1@ou.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
I agree a complete DX7 emulator as an opcode would be great. Presets could be
called directly or setting all the parameters from an external file maybe (to
allow for alternative presets). Or maybe an emulator for each synthesis stage...
for example (I know this would be illegal) for a Korg 01/W, there should be an
opcode implementing the waveshaping tables from the original instrument (Is
there any way to get them?)... or at least we should have them as ftables to be
loaded by the emulator with the existent opcodes.
You can dor FM synthesis already now with Csound, as "preset" I mean opcodes
without such flexibility but easier to use. Why not?
Terry Cast wrote:
> If I may add my two cents . . .
>
> By "preset" do you mean something imitating (or duplicating) a certain sound
> created by a synth, or the algorithm that produces that sound? The latter
> is, IMO, a better candidate for a new opcode.
> How exactly could you "do whatever you wanted" with such an opcode?
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa01823;
17 Feb 99 3:13 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 10CxQD-0000B3-00; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 03:13:09 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (DAA14628); Wed, 17 Feb 1999 03:11:56 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 03:11:43 GMT
Received: from vcn.bc.ca [207.102.64.2] by hermes via ESMTP (DAA15200); Wed, 17 Feb 1999 03:11:42 GMT
Received: from localhost (wfreno@localhost)
by vcn.bc.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA28344
for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:07:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Wayne Freno
To: Csound List
Subject: DX7 emulator
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
I believe that a DX7 emulator for csound,
containing all 32 algorithms
already exists. Check out:
http://www.parnasse.com/dx72csnd.shtml
Sorry if I am mistaken, I just looked at the site, and
didn't try it out.
--
end soundbite
|