| As of 3.58 the restriuction to 5 arguments has gone, so teh code here has chang
somewhat. I will see what happens ASAP
==John
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa10453;
27 Aug 99 14:40 BST
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 11KL9G-0007qz-00
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:30:26 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (OAA09741); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:37:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:37:22 +0100
Received: from tung.algonet.se [194.213.74.55] by hermes via SMTP (OAA12225); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:37:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: (qmail 962 invoked from network); 27 Aug 1999 15:23:07 +0200
Received: from enok.algonet.se (194.213.74.88)
by tung.algonet.se with SMTP; 27 Aug 1999 15:23:07 +0200
Received: from du57-26.ppp.algonet.se ([195.100.26.57])
by algonet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier1.0.4) with ESMTP
; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:23:08 GMT
From: Anders Andersson
To: The CSound mailinglist
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 07:29:32 +0200
Message-ID:
X-Mailer: YAM 2.0Preview7 [020] - Amiga Mailer by Marcel Beck - http://www.yam.ch
Subject: VCO Opcode
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hello! It's been a long time since I wrote to this list, but now I have a
question regarding Hans Mikaelssons excellent VCO opcode:
Why do I have to set KR=SR when using it?
It seems that there is a bug somewhere that will make the opcode act very
strange when using lower KR like 4-500Hz.
Is this a bug, or must it be this way? It's very annoying because things go
way faster with a very low KR, when you are testing your instruments, but
if you set it so low, the VCO will "snap, crackle and pop".. :)
Regards
Anders Andersson
ps
Yes, I know the Amiga version is stalled, but I'm working on it.. I
really do! =)
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa10486;
27 Aug 99 14:51 BST
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 11KMPI-0000aT-00
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:51:04 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (OAA13014); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:47:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:47:41 +0100
Received: from exim@wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk [138.38.100.104] by hermes via ESMTP (OAA12658); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:47:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [138.38.97.36] (helo=maths.Bath.AC.UK ident=mmdf)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 11KLGN-0007r9-00; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:37:48 +0100
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
To: costello@seanet.com
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
In-reply-to: <37C5EF90.7F318560@seanet.com> (message from Sean Costello on
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 18:53:20 -0700)
Subject: Re: Is there a size limit for this list?
References: <37C5EF90.7F318560@seanet.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 99 14:47:28 BST
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
Message-Id:
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Wow! an 11Kb message would take some time to download.
Surely it could be compressed, or put on a ftp site or something?
==John ff
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11959;
28 Aug 99 3:08 BST
Received: from [203.36.219.100] (helo=wpdnt.webpage.com.au)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 11KWoz-0008GD-00
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 01:58:18 +0100
Received: from rossbenc (unverified [203.152.255.113]) by wpdnt.webpage.com.au
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 3.3.1) with SMTP id ;
Sat, 28 Aug 1999 12:06:37 +1000
Message-ID: <007101bef0f9$f8a46980$71ff98cb@rossbenc>
From: Ross Bencina
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at UK.AC.Bath.maths.omphalos
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at UK.AC.Bath.maths.omphalos
Subject: Re: Is there a size limit for this list?[ot]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 11:36:37 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>Wow! an 11Kb message would take some time to download.
Are your serious? Perhaps the infrastructure is better here in oz, but I
regularly post >200k emails around the place and they only take a couple of
minutes to download. I understand the reasoning behind limiting post size on
a broadcast list, but I for one would appreciate being able to post /
recieve csound code via the list rather than having to rummage around
looking for a web site somewhere. Perhaps a 25k message limit?
Just my 2 colonial cents worth.
Best Regards,
Ross.
|