| Hello, John:
I've compiled the latest Csound for Linux and have prepared another
Linux-ready source tree. The gzipped files are currently available via
anonymous ftp at
ftp://mustec.bgsu.edu/pub/Linux
The makefile does need the X lib location changed: I inadvertently left
my own lib path in there (it's not a standard location), sorry about
that, but it's a very easy fix.
Would you like these packages uploaded to the Bath site ? Please
advise.
And as always, thank you for all your work on Csound !
== Dave Phillips
http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/index.html
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa01391;
16 May 97 15:11 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa16227;
16 May 97 15:15 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Fri, 16 May 1997 15:15:01 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (OAA24096);
Fri, 16 May 1997 14:39:11 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Fri, 16 May 97 14:39:01 +0100
Received: from talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk [193.37.225.1] by hermes
via ESMTP (OAA24075); Fri, 16 May 1997 14:39:00 +0100
Received: (from rwd@localhost) by talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk (8.7.5/8.7.3)
id OAA24580 for csound@noether.ex.ac.uk;
Fri, 16 May 1997 14:37:01 +0100 (BST)
From: Richard Dobson
Message-Id: <199705161337.OAA24580@talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk>
Subject: Can't read non-text messages!
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 14:37:00 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
This is a little mini-moan. I only have an old-fashioned user-unfriendly
UNIX mail system available to read postings, so I cannot read the fancy non-text
postings some subscribers make. In some cases the mail system cannot even display an encoded
version, so I can't even copy it somewhere else to view.
Is it possible that those making such postings can send a standard text version
instead of, or even as well as, the deluxe version?
Richard Dobson.
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa01573;
16 May 97 17:06 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20425;
16 May 97 17:10 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Fri, 16 May 1997 17:09:52 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (QAA09276);
Fri, 16 May 1997 16:56:23 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Fri, 16 May 97 16:56:13 +0100
Received: from root@biteme.psibercom.org [205.187.205.187] by hermes
via ESMTP (QAA09251); Fri, 16 May 1997 16:56:07 +0100
Received: (from spore@localhost) by biteme.psibercom.org (8.7.6/8.7.3)
id IAA05377; Fri, 16 May 1997 08:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: spore!
Message-Id: <199705161556.IAA05377@biteme.psibercom.org>
Subject: Re: Can't read non-text messages!
In-Reply-To: <199705161337.OAA24580@talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk> from Richard Dobson at "May 16, 97 02:37:00 pm"
To: Richard Dobson , csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 08:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Time-Sync: psibercom time sync by xntp3.5c
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
> This is a little mini-moan. I only have an old-fashioned user-unfriendly
> UNIX mail system available to read postings, so I cannot read the fancy non-text
> postings some subscribers make. In some cases the mail system cannot even display an encoded
> version, so I can't even copy it somewhere else to view.
> Is it possible that those making such postings can send a standard text version
> instead of, or even as well as, the deluxe version?
>
> Richard Dobson.
This can be a problem. Try getting your administrator to install a mailer
with MIME ability. He or she should install 'metamail' too, for the
mailer to use in its decoding of those messages. I use elm, and it does
MIME decoding, I'm pretty sure pine can do it.
I hate MIME messages, too, but while some are simply annoying wastes of
bandwidth (Microsoft-generated-anything) others are actually necessary
(7-bit ASCII just can't support European/Asian alphabet systems).
Unfortuantely, not all the world hates a MIME. ;-)
+matt
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew at biteme spore@psibercom.org
+ Nyquist Theory and Soul Management +
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa01822;
16 May 97 18:27 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa23572;
16 May 97 18:31 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Fri, 16 May 1997 18:30:51 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA15484);
Fri, 16 May 1997 18:18:51 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Fri, 16 May 97 18:18:46 +0100
Received: from Princeton.EDU [128.112.128.1] by hermes via SMTP (SAA15476);
Fri, 16 May 1997 18:18:43 +0100
Received: from silvertone.Princeton.EDU
by Princeton.EDU (5.65b/2.128/princeton) id AA23992;
Fri, 16 May 97 13:04:32 -0400
Received: from lespaul.Princeton.EDU (lespaul.Princeton.EDU [128.112.240.78])
by silvertone.Princeton.EDU (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF)
via ESMTP id NAA22155; Fri, 16 May 1997 13:04:30 -0400
Received: by lespaul.Princeton.EDU (950413.SGI.8.6.12/Simple Client) id RAA07970;
Fri, 16 May 1997 17:04:28 GMT
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 13:04:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Koonce
To: Mike Chapman
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Pitch loudness
In-Reply-To: <97May14.212018+0100_bst.28808-26909+98@mail.u-net.net>
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
This is the equal loudness problem. Take a look at the
Fletcher-Munson equal loudness curves.
Paul Koonce
On Wed, 14 May 1997, Mike Chapman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When fading out on my mixing desk i think the bass fades quicker
> than the trebble. Is there an equation / rule for this?
>
> A constant fade filter might be interesting.
>
> Bye.
>
> Mike
>
>
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa02122;
16 May 97 20:33 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa27538;
16 May 97 20:37 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:36:52 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (UAA21696);
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:32:31 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Fri, 16 May 97 20:32:24 +0100
Received: from [195.63.142.193] by hermes via ESMTP (UAA21686);
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:32:22 +0100
Received: from zipfel.wb-net.de (du11hl.hl.nordicdata.de [194.162.131.61])
by karl-heinz.wb-net.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA24209
for ; Fri, 16 May 1997 21:46:25 +0200
Message-Id: <337CB668.85C@wb-net.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 21:32:56 +0200
From: Erasmus Zipfel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Csound Mailing List
Cc: Csound Mailing List
Subject: Re: re granular synthesis
References: <199705131145.MAA18746@hermes> <3378F5D4.5C48@agora.stm.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
> I downloaded the file "Version3.46.Notes" about the additional feature
> of version 3.46. I have found several lacks in the documentation i.e.:
>
> 1) Where is the manual of new "FOG" opcode?
> 2) What are the bug fixes of "igoto"?
> 3) What are the improvements in "pvoc" and what is the new additional
> optional argument?
> 4) In what case "endin" statement had not noticed before the fix?
>
> Could anyone inform me and the Csounders about these questions?
>
> Thanks and happy csounding!
>
I would like to add, that the information about the following
feature is also missing:
> > k) Robin Whittle's table reading opcodes
Thanks
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa02122;
16 May 97 20:33 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa27538;
16 May 97 20:37 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:36:52 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (UAA21696);
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:32:31 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Fri, 16 May 97 20:32:24 +0100
Received: from [195.63.142.193] by hermes via ESMTP (UAA21686);
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:32:22 +0100
Received: from zipfel.wb-net.de (du11hl.hl.nordicdata.de [194.162.131.61])
by karl-heinz.wb-net.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA24209
for ; Fri, 16 May 1997 21:46:25 +0200
Message-Id: <337CB668.85C@wb-net.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 21:32:56 +0200
From: Erasmus Zipfel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Csound Mailing List
Cc: Csound Mailing List
Subject: Re: re granular synthesis
References: <199705131145.MAA18746@hermes> <3378F5D4.5C48@agora.stm.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
> I downloaded the file "Version3.46.Notes" about the additional feature
> of version 3.46. I have found several lacks in the documentation i.e.:
>
> 1) Where is the manual of new "FOG" opcode?
> 2) What are the bug fixes of "igoto"?
> 3) What are the improvements in "pvoc" and what is the new additional
> optional argument?
> 4) In what case "endin" statement had not noticed before the fix?
>
> Could anyone inform me and the Csounders about these questions?
>
> Thanks and happy csounding!
>
I would like to add, that the information about the following
feature is also missing:
> > k) Robin Whittle's table reading opcodes
Thanks
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa02896;
17 May 97 1:46 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa07159;
17 May 97 1:50 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Sat, 17 May 1997 01:50:01 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (BAA01334);
Sat, 17 May 1997 01:43:54 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Sat, 17 May 97 01:43:48 +0100
Received: from amprop.com [206.30.88.4] by hermes via ESMTP (BAA01331);
Sat, 17 May 1997 01:43:46 +0100
Received: from [206.30.88.106]
by milhouse.infohouse.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-12482)
with ESMTP id AAA151; Fri, 16 May 1997 21:44:42 -0400
X-Sender: ic11748@mail.infohouse.com
Message-Id:
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 20:50:28 -0400
To: Mike Chapman
From: tolve
Subject: Re: Pitch Loudness
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/enriched; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
you wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> When fading out on my mixing desk i think the bass fades quicker
> than the trebble. Is there an equation / rule for this?
>=20
> A constant fade filter might be interesting.
i stepped into this mine field not too long ago. my interest was in
improving my ability to tweak levels of individual harmonics within a
waveform. am just beginning to adjust to intravenous feeding. a fader
designed to fade in sones? there are apparently lots of equations, none
of which seem to work very well. for an introductory explanation try
pages 17-22 of...
TimesElements of Computer
Music by F. Richard Moore
published by Prentice Hall. ISBN # 0-13-252-552-6
about $64 plus tax and S&H
Available in the U.S. from Simon & Schuster Telephone: 800 947-7700
Author suggests prerequisite of knowledge of C language and music
notation but this is certainly not necessary for understanding these
particular pages. Incidentally, pages
indicated include Fletcher Munson Dead Man's Curve which just barely
reveals the surface of the problem. as i related to a friend...
***now here is the horrifying truth of Fletcher-Munson, when coupled
with some other *stuff*. picture you have 12 television sets. no, 120.
and each must be adjusted perfectly relative to the others in order for
you to hear intelligible dialogue. now the volume controls on each set
are completely different. some get real loud when you increase the
volume from 3 to 4. others hardly seem to change at all. and each time
you raise or lower the volume of one set, it changes the volume of all
the other sets as well. in ways you can't predict. moreover, in order
to adjust the volume of one or more sets using the universal remote
that came with them (csound), you also have to open and close the
refrigerator door. and feed the cat.***
But Peter Kearton did express some modicum of hope in the
followingTimes...
>>>
From: Peter Kearton
<
Organization: Psychology Dept, Surrey Univ. U.K.
To: tolve <, csound@maths.exeter.ac.uk
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 10:24:41 GMT
Subject: Re: postponing sones
Priority: normal
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.exeter.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi,
I think the best book you could read on the perception of loudness=20
in both pure and complex tones is:-=20
'An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing' by Brian C.J. Moore=20
(no relation?), a new edition of the book has just come out (Acedemic=20
Press)=20
The whole book is a comprehensive introduction to the=20
psychophysics of hearing, with Chapters 2 and 3 being particularly=20
relevant. Chapter 3 deal with 'Frequency Analysis, masking, and the=20
critical band'. If you read about auditory filters and the critical=20
band concept this will point in the right direction for=20
approximate scaling of loudness for complex tones derived from=20
additive synthesis. Basically component tones close enough in=20
frequency to fall within the 'critical band' will interact. From=20
the above book 2nd Ed. p.84:-
'The increase in loudness with increasing bandwidth can be understood=20
if we assume that when the bandwidth of a sound is sufficient to=20
occupy more than one critical band, the loudness in adjacent, but not=20
overlapping, bands is summed to give total loudness.'
Critical Bands are approximately 10 % - 15 % of their centre=20
frequency.
(However, Moore (Brian C.J !) notes that the whole area is one of=20
contention).
On page 85 he uses Steven's Power Law that says
Loudness (aprox.) =3D kI^0.3
=20
k =3D constant (depending on units and subject !)
I =3D Physical Intensity
So, if you have two pure tones of the same intensity, that are close=20
enough to occupy the same 'critical band' and you keep the same=20
intensities, but slowly increase the frequency separation what is the=20
effect on loudness perception ? When the two tones occupy different=20
frequency bands then in effect you now have two bands with half the=20
original intensity. Halving the intensity is equivalent to 0.81 the=20
original loudness (by Steven's). So the total loudness in the two=20
bands will now be
2 * 0.81 =3D 1.62 times the original !
=20
=20
It's a woolly area though. The other thing I would suggest would be=20
to get hold of some specifications for sophisticated environmental=20
noise meters. The good ones use algorithms that take psychophisical=20
data into consideration.=20
Don't despair just yet !
=20
Pete Kearton
*************************************************
Peter Kearton,
University of Surrey Psychology Department,
Guildford,
United Kingdom.
GU2 5XH
Tel. UK (01483) 300800 Ext.3346
e-mail - P.kearton@surrey.ac.uk
*************************************************Times<<<<<<
Some day someone is bound to wrestle this tiger to the ground. May the
force of light be with *you*.
tolve
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03008;
17 May 97 2:54 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa09182;
17 May 97 2:58 BST
Received: from viernes.iwm.com.mx by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Sat, 17 May 1997 02:58:26 +0100
Received: from dialup-2.iwm.com.mx (dialup-2.iwm.com.mx [200.30.26.21])
by viernes.iwm.com.mx (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA16230;
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:59:48 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 20:59:48 -0500
Message-Id: <199705170159.UAA16230@viernes.iwm.com.mx>
X-Sender: yayo@viernes.iwm.com.mx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk, csound@noether.ex.AC.UK
From: Eduardo Arenas
Subject: Re: files open?
At 12:33 PM 5/16/97 BST, jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
>Message written at 16 May 1997 10:40:45 +0100
>--- Copy of mail to Marie.Pauline.G.Esguerra@dartmouth.edu ---
>In-reply-to: <31937947@vixen.Dartmouth.EDU>
> (Marie.Pauline.G.Esguerra@dartmouth.edu)
>
>>>>>> "M" == Marie Pauline G Esguerra
writes:
>
> M> is there some limit on the number of files that can be open at one
time, or the
> M> number of occurrences of one file that can be open at a time? larry p.
and i
> M> are still having our very odd problem of csound quitting in a large
score using
> M> a LOT of soundfiles
>
>There is no internal reason why you cannot have an infinite number of
>files, but there are two caveats. First many operating systems impose
>a limit -- for example Unix does. The second is a half-memory of mine
>which I suspect Mike/Dave/Matt at Mills may know more about. On the
>Macintosh C system i have used there is a limit on teh number of files
>imposed by teh C library, as it emulated teh Unix open command via
>fopen etc. My MAC is not accessable at present so I cannot check.
>
>==John ff
>
Eduardo Arenas de Tellitu
Mexico D.F.
Tel.(525)687-0850
Fax.(525)543-2490
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03048;
17 May 97 3:02 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa09354;
17 May 97 3:05 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Sat, 17 May 1997 03:05:36 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (CAA02954);
Sat, 17 May 1997 02:58:00 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Sat, 17 May 97 02:57:54 +0100
Received: from root@viernes.iwm.com.mx [200.30.26.3] by hermes
via ESMTP (CAA02951); Sat, 17 May 1997 02:57:53 +0100
Received: from dialup-2.iwm.com.mx (dialup-2.iwm.com.mx [200.30.26.21])
by viernes.iwm.com.mx (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA16218;
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:59:05 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 20:59:05 -0500
Message-Id: <199705170159.UAA16218@viernes.iwm.com.mx>
X-Sender: yayo@viernes.iwm.com.mx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Gabriel Maldonado ,
Csound Mailing List
From: Eduardo Arenas
Subject: Re: Realtime MIDI csound
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
At 07:55 AM 5/15/97 +0200, Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>I've just uploaded release 1.71 of Win95 realtime version, including
>3.46 john ffitch version opcodes (PVOC fixed, HRTF fixed, FOG, DISKIN
>and MIDI pitch-bend related).
>You can download it at the usual url:
>
>http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/download.htm
>
>I also decided to make the sources of my version avalaible to Csound
>community.
>
>To John FFitch: can I upload the sources in your site? I will be happy
>if my opcodes could be included in the next official version.
>
>Thanks
>
>--
>Gabriel Maldonado
>
>mailto:g.maldonado@agora.stm.it
>http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/home2.htm
>
>
Eduardo Arenas de Tellitu
Mexico D.F.
Tel.(525)687-0850
Fax.(525)543-2490
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03065;
17 May 97 3:04 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa09510;
17 May 97 3:08 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Sat, 17 May 1997 03:07:59 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (CAA02984);
Sat, 17 May 1997 02:58:37 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Sat, 17 May 97 02:58:31 +0100
Received: from root@viernes.iwm.com.mx [200.30.26.3] by hermes
via ESMTP (CAA02973); Sat, 17 May 1997 02:58:26 +0100
Received: from dialup-2.iwm.com.mx (dialup-2.iwm.com.mx [200.30.26.21])
by viernes.iwm.com.mx (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA16230;
Fri, 16 May 1997 20:59:48 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 20:59:48 -0500
Message-Id: <199705170159.UAA16230@viernes.iwm.com.mx>
X-Sender: yayo@viernes.iwm.com.mx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk, csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Eduardo Arenas
Subject: Re: files open?
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
At 12:33 PM 5/16/97 BST, jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
>Message written at 16 May 1997 10:40:45 +0100
>--- Copy of mail to Marie.Pauline.G.Esguerra@dartmouth.edu ---
>In-reply-to: <31937947@vixen.Dartmouth.EDU>
> (Marie.Pauline.G.Esguerra@dartmouth.edu)
>
>>>>>> "M" == Marie Pauline G Esguerra
writes:
>
> M> is there some limit on the number of files that can be open at one
time, or the
> M> number of occurrences of one file that can be open at a time? larry p.
and i
> M> are still having our very odd problem of csound quitting in a large
score using
> M> a LOT of soundfiles
>
>There is no internal reason why you cannot have an infinite number of
>files, but there are two caveats. First many operating systems impose
>a limit -- for example Unix does. The second is a half-memory of mine
>which I suspect Mike/Dave/Matt at Mills may know more about. On the
>Macintosh C system i have used there is a limit on teh number of files
>imposed by teh C library, as it emulated teh Unix open command via
>fopen etc. My MAC is not accessable at present so I cannot check.
>
>==John ff
>
Eduardo Arenas de Tellitu
Mexico D.F.
Tel.(525)687-0850
Fax.(525)543-2490
Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03224;
17 May 97 5:06 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa13028;
17 May 97 5:10 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Sat, 17 May 1997 05:09:26 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (FAA05783);
Sat, 17 May 1997 05:00:18 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
Sat, 17 May 97 05:00:04 +0100
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.103] by hermes
via ESMTP (FAA05755); Sat, 17 May 1997 05:00:01 +0100
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.70])
by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id XAA25402 (8.6.11/IDA-1.6
for ); Fri, 16 May 1997 23:54:42 -0400
Received: from mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA
by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17) id XAA13391;
Fri, 16 May 1997 23:59:26 -0400
Received: from GAP
by mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17) id XAA10522;
Fri, 16 May 1997 23:59:23 -0400
Message-Id: <337D2A04.2781@ere.umontreal.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 23:46:12 -0400
From: Jean Piche
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.3 IP32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: csound
Subject: csoundscore to midifile???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Thought I'd never ask...
Anyone?
--
________________________________________________________
Jean Piche
Universite de Montreal
http://mistral.ere.umontreal.ca/~pichej
http://www.musique.umontreal.ca/Org/CompoElectro/CEC/
|