Where can I get hold of this (csound-orc.el), and how do I configure emacs
to use it?


thanks in advance,

jamieB

-----Original Message-----
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk 
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk 
Date: 18 November 1998 13:48
Subject: csound-orc.el


>Message written at 18 Nov 1998 12:39:44 +0000
>
>I have updated the Emacs orchestra mode file to take account of the
>new opcodes etc, and fixed a couple of minor bugs.  There are still
>some outstanding errors and infelicities which i will be looking at in
>teh next few days.
>==John ff
>












Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa28579;
          21 Nov 98 17:50 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
	by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
	for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
	id 0zhHB1-0001QN-00; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 17:50:31 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (RAA06891); Sat, 21 Nov 1998 17:46:47 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 17:46:36 GMT
Received: from howl.werewolf.net [206.103.224.20] by hermes via ESMTP (RAA15346); Sat, 21 Nov 1998 17:46:35 GMT
Received: from default (dial72.werewolf.net [206.103.225.82])
	by howl.werewolf.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id LAA17468
	for ; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 11:40:57 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <001d01be1577$68544fc0$52e167ce@default>
From: Hans Mikelson 
To: Csound 
Subject: Csound Magazine still needs some contributions
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 11:50:18 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

There are still a couple of blank buttons on the magazine web site.  I would
like to get articles on synthesis and Csound internals.  I don't have any
announcements either.

Check it out at:
http://www.werewolf.net/~hljmm/Ezine/

Hope to hear from you,
Hans Mikelson











Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa28701;
          21 Nov 98 19:01 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
	by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
	for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
	id 0zhII0-0001TS-00; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 19:01:48 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (TAA13258); Sat, 21 Nov 1998 19:00:53 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 19:00:45 GMT
Received: from root@lix.intercom.es [194.179.21.2] by hermes via ESMTP (TAA00111); Sat, 21 Nov 1998 19:00:44 GMT
Received: from intercom.es (iv2-120.intercom.es [195.76.206.120]) by lix.intercom.es (8.7.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA15817; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:01:42 +0100
Message-ID: <36570D86.4E419FCC@intercom.es>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 19:59:18 +0100
From: Josep M Comajuncosas 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Matt J. Ingalls" 
CC: vjs@ndirect.co.uk, csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: rand outputs
References: <15850956@donner.Dartmouth.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id TAA00111
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Matt J. Ingalls wrote:

> i just looked at the output of randi in ..
> the output is from 0-2*xamp
> did new improvements forget to subtract xamp on output?

Yes, I thing this is a bug ... it should be corrected to allow backwards
compatibility with older orc.=B4s, though a range 0-x is usually as usefu=
ll as -x
to x.











Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00075;
          22 Nov 98 10:33 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
	by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
	for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
	id 0zhWpb-0003vC-00; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:33:27 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (KAA10275); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:27:23 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:27:15 GMT
Received: from root@lix.intercom.es [194.179.21.2] by hermes via ESMTP (KAA07519); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 10:27:13 GMT
Received: from intercom.es (iv2-34.intercom.es [195.76.206.34]) by lix.intercom.es (8.7.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA28366 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:29:34 +0100
Message-ID: <3657E6B6.8CA046AE@intercom.es>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:25:58 +0100
From: Josep M Comajuncosas 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: PhM out of tune
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id KAA07519
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Hi all,
I=B4m having serious problems with a waveguide Physical Model of a
clarinet I=B4m building. In fact it is really *out of tune* (though the
delay line uses interpolation) and I=B4d like to know the most probable
causes. I thought they could be the lowpass in the feedback loop (which
induces some freq. dependant delay, but it doesn=B4t seem to be so big)
and the waveshaping function also inside the loop. What do you think?
I=B4d like to know if there is a way to apply waveshaping without inducin=
g

phase delays, or a way to calculate it to compensate for the delay in
the loop.
Thancks in advance!

Josep M Comajuncosas











Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00127;
          22 Nov 98 11:05 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
	by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
	for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
	id 0zhXKR-00029K-00; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:05:19 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (LAA02224); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:00:23 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:00:13 GMT
Received: from agora.stm.it [195.62.32.1] by hermes via ESMTP (LAA10269); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:00:12 GMT
Received: from agora.stm.it (ppp02-24.dial-access.stm.it [195.62.37.88]) by agora.stm.it (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA19018; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 12:00:00 +0100 (ITA)
Message-ID: <3657F004.4E7B6C87@agora.stm.it>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 12:05:40 +0100
From: Gabriel Maldonado 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Josep M Comajuncosas 
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: PhM out of tune
References: <3657E6B6.8CA046AE@intercom.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id LAA10269
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

I noticed that the same problem is presente even in the plucked string mo=
del. Probably it
depends by the fact that the delay of the filter  is still non-fractional=
. For example,
when no filter is present in the string model, the pitch of high notes is=
 OK. I suppose
(but I'm not sure) that also filter coefficients should change when chang=
ing pitch.

Gab

Josep M Comajuncosas wrote:
>=20
> Hi all,
> I=B4m having serious problems with a waveguide Physical Model of a
> clarinet I=B4m building. In fact it is really *out of tune* (though the
> delay line uses interpolation) and I=B4d like to know the most probable
> causes. I thought they could be the lowpass in the feedback loop (which
> induces some freq. dependant delay, but it doesn=B4t seem to be so big)
> and the waveshaping function also inside the loop. What do you think?
> I=B4d like to know if there is a way to apply waveshaping without induc=
ing
>=20
> phase delays, or a way to calculate it to compensate for the delay in
> the loop.
> Thancks in advance!
>=20
> Josep M Comajuncosas

--=20
Gabriel Maldonado

http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/home2.htm