|
If this post reaches the list would somebody be kind enough to mail
me personally. I tried a test yesterday and got the infamous UNDELIVERABLE
MESSAGE, but no csound bounce. Yet somebody replied to it. It suddenly
dawned on me that I have had no post from the Csound user group for that
time. I've spoken to my provider and are as perplexed as I am. Any ideas?
Per Byrne Villez
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
To: hbyrne@pavilion.co.uk
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
In-reply-to: <199707071308.OAA24045@florence.pavilion.net> (message from Per
Villez on Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:12:43 +0000)
Subject: Re: No post for 10 days
BCC: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
References: <199707071308.OAA24045@florence.pavilion.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 97 15:09:06 BST
Sender: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
I have seen very little either. My Digests recently were very small.
Perhaps our American cousins are still recovering from July 4?
==John
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa01867;
7 Jul 97 15:17 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa14664;
7 Jul 97 15:16 BST
Received: (qmail 26993 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 14:16:49 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 14:16:49 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (PAA27801); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:18:09 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97 15:17:57 +0100
Received: from pp@goggins.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.13] by hermes via ESMTP (PAA27783); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:17:52 +0100
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Message-Id: <199707071417.PAA27783@hermes>
Received: from maths.Bath.AC.UK (actually host omphalos.maths.bath.ac.uk)
by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:08:52 +0100
To: hbyrne@pavilion.co.uk
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <199707071308.OAA24045@florence.pavilion.net> (message from Per Villez on Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:12:43 +0000)
Subject: Re: No post for 10 days
References: <199707071308.OAA24045@florence.pavilion.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 97 15:09:06 BST
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
I have seen very little either. My Digests recently were very small.
Perhaps our American cousins are still recovering from July 4?
==John
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03180;
7 Jul 97 16:51 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa16460;
7 Jul 97 16:51 BST
Received: (qmail 27894 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 15:51:00 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 15:51:00 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (QAA03164); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:37:52 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97 16:37:41 +0100
Received: from root@burdell.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.3.207] by hermes via ESMTP (QAA03157); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:37:39 +0100
Received: from lennon.cc.gatech.edu (jeff@lennon.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.9.20]) by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA03225 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 11:37:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from jeff@localhost) by lennon.cc.gatech.edu (8.8.4/8.6.9) id LAA02328 for csound@noether.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 11:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeffrey William Chastine
Message-Id: <199707071537.LAA02328@lennon.cc.gatech.edu>
Subject: Tutorials
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 11:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi,
I'm a little new to CSound and am trying to find
some good tutorials about it. I've downloaded "winload.exe"
and found it helpful (the Boulanger tutorial) and now I'm
looking for something that gives examples of various
basic instruments (or unusual timbres). Any ideas??
Also, if there's anyone from Atlanta, GA (USA),
I'd like to hear from you (it's good to know the locals 8).
Any help would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
-=Jeff Chastine=-
--
-----------------------------------------------------
| Jeff Chastine | "Willie was a chemist |
| (jeff@cc.gatech.edu) | but Willie is no more. |
| JAVA! TA | What Willie thought was H20|
| | was H2SO4" - unknown |
-----------------------------------------------------
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03223;
7 Jul 97 17:12 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa16837;
7 Jul 97 17:12 BST
Received: (qmail 28016 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 16:12:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 16:12:09 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (QAA04508); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:56:17 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97 16:56:05 +0100
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk [128.86.8.45] by hermes via SMTP (QAA04331); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:53:24 +0100
Received: from florence.pavilion.net (actually host mailrelay1.pavilion.net) by sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP (PP); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:53:37 +0100
Received: from [194.242.131.91] (dialup1-27.pavilion.co.uk [194.242.131.91])
by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA04939
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:49:46 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199707071549.QAA04939@florence.pavilion.net>
X-Sender: hbyrne@mailhost.pavilion.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:54:16 +0000
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Per Villez
Subject: undelivarable messages
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Thanks for all those who replied to my message.
I got them through my personal email address but the message I sent to the
list didn't, which confirms my suspicion that I am not receiving the mail
from the Csound list. What did come back was the following:
Date: 07 Jul 97 09:22:39 EDT
From: Electronic Postmaster
Comments: Returned from: <100660.2353@CompuServe.COM>
To: Per Villez
Subject: Undeliverable message
Re: ? EMDRNF - Mail Delivery Failure. Receiver not found. 100660,2353
No post for 10 days
Your message could not be delivered as addressed.
--- Returned message ---
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@noether.ex.ac.uk
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (hermes.ex.ac.uk [194.83.11.25])
by dub-img-2.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.1) with SMTP id JAA26248
for <100660.2353@compuserve.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 09:22:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (OAA24191); Mon, 7
Jul 1997 14:15:48 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97
14:23:50 +0100
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk [128.86.8.45] by hermes via SMTP
(OAA23954); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:11:50 +0100
Received: from florence.pavilion.net (actually host
mailrelay1.pavilion.net) by sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
(PP); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:12:03 +0100
Received: from [194.242.131.159] (dialup2-31.pavilion.co.uk [194.242.131.159])
by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA24045
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:08:14 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199707071308.OAA24045@florence.pavilion.net>
X-Sender: hbyrne@mailhost.pavilion.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:12:43 +0000
To: csound@noether.ex.ac.uk
From: hbyrne@pavilion.co.uk (Per Villez)
Subject: No post for 10 days
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@noether.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
If this post reaches the list would somebody be kind enough to mail
me personally. I tried a test yesterday and got the infamous UNDELIVERABLE
MESSAGE, but no csound bounce. Yet somebody replied to it. It suddenly
dawned on me that I have had no post from the Csound user group for that
time. I've spoken to my provider and are as perplexed as I am. Any ideas?
Per Byrne Villez
Perhaps other list users have had a similar problem if so let me know (
personal mail) so that I can trace the problem and wring the appropriate
necks.
cheers, Per Byrne Villez
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03436;
7 Jul 97 18:58 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17872;
7 Jul 97 18:58 BST
Received: (qmail 28320 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 17:58:21 -0000
Received: from westnet.com (lt@206.24.6.2)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 17:58:21 -0000
Received: from localhost (lt@localhost)
by westnet.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA13960;
Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Larry Troxler
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
cc: hbyrne@pavilion.co.uk, csound@noether.ex.AC.UK
Subject: Re: No post for 10 days
In-Reply-To: <199707071417.PAA27783@hermes>
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997 jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> I have seen very little either. My Digests recently were very small.
> Perhaps our American cousins are still recovering from July 4?
> ==John
>
There has been indeed list traffic over the last few days. So if you
haven't received anything in 10 days, I would say something is wrong.
Larry
-- Larry Troxler -- lt@westnet.com -- Patterson, NY USA --
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03554;
7 Jul 97 19:12 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17999;
7 Jul 97 19:12 BST
Received: (qmail 28366 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 18:12:24 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 18:12:24 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA10780); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 18:58:26 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97 18:58:16 +0100
Received: from lt@westnet.com [206.24.6.2] by hermes via ESMTP (SAA10768); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 18:58:15 +0100
Received: from localhost (lt@localhost)
by westnet.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA13960;
Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Larry Troxler
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Cc: hbyrne@pavilion.co.uk, csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: No post for 10 days
In-Reply-To: <199707071417.PAA27783@hermes>
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997 jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> I have seen very little either. My Digests recently were very small.
> Perhaps our American cousins are still recovering from July 4?
> ==John
>
There has been indeed list traffic over the last few days. So if you
haven't received anything in 10 days, I would say something is wrong.
Larry
-- Larry Troxler -- lt@westnet.com -- Patterson, NY USA --
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03694;
7 Jul 97 20:16 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa18333;
7 Jul 97 20:16 BST
Received: (qmail 28522 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 19:16:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 19:16:31 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (UAA13500); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:03:54 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97 20:03:45 +0100
Received: from mailrelay1.pavilion.net [194.242.128.25] by hermes via ESMTP (UAA13495); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:03:44 +0100
Received: from [194.242.131.114] (dialup1-50.pavilion.co.uk [194.242.131.114])
by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA17519
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:03:20 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199707071903.UAA17519@florence.pavilion.net>
X-Sender: hbyrne@mailhost.pavilion.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:07:49 +0000
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Per Villez
Subject: getting the digest
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Thanks to all of you who sent me acknowledgement notes. Very much
appreciated. Somehow the problem has corrected itself and I received todays
Csound mail. As other Csound mail users have had similar problem with the
infamous 'undeliverable message' it might be wise to keep a log of the
bouncers address. Hopefully we can identify this nuisance.
Per
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa03709;
7 Jul 97 20:29 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa18367;
7 Jul 97 20:29 BST
Received: (qmail 28538 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1997 19:29:11 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Jul 1997 19:29:11 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (UAA13871); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:12:21 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Mon, 7 Jul 97 20:12:11 +0100
Received: from mailrelay1.pavilion.net [194.242.128.25] by hermes via ESMTP (UAA13864); Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:12:10 +0100
Received: from [194.242.131.114] (dialup1-50.pavilion.co.uk [194.242.131.114])
by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA17938
for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:11:50 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199707071911.UAA17938@florence.pavilion.net>
X-Sender: hbyrne@mailhost.pavilion.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:16:19 +0000
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Per Villez
Subject: Re: Blowing home up
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
>At 09:36 04/07/97 +0200, you wrote:
>>>In cases like this, it's *much* better to capture the actual event.
>>>I've found that exploding my place of residence works well.
>>
>>A pretty interesting approach, but somewhat straightforward for a
>>Csounder, don't you think so ? :)
>>Maybe one of these samples cds could be useful after all...
>
>Hmmm - I'd have to disagree. I've tried blowing those up and they don't
>sound anything like the real thing. Disappointing, but true.
>
>Slightly more seriously - don't forget that those Hollywood explosions are
>processed to death with compression, EQ, aural exciters, and all of that
>kind of stuff. Getting something similar out of Csound would take a long
>time. The easy way to do it would be to use a sample CD or two, hire an
>hour in a decent studio, layer some pitch shifted and processed samples and
>then splice the result wherever it's supposed to go in the finished piece.
>Which is pretty much how the real thing is done, in fact...
>
>R.
The cheap crossplatform approach I suppose?
per
|