| Jim Stevenson Ph.D wrote:
>
> How does SGI compare with pentium2 on PC?
I don't think that it is appropriate to compare an O2 box to a pentium
pro, but I'm sure some PC-happy person would just love to start a big
OS/box flame war:) The SGI O2 compares well against an Ultrasparc in my
opinion. But Sun and SGI make different types of computers than PC's,
Macs, Ataris, and Amigas. The differences are numerous...
--
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Michael Coble, System Engineer
Time Inc. New Media, Pathfinder
Home: http://pathfinder.com/pathfinder/staff/mcoble/
Work: http://www.pathfinder.com/
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21723;
12 Jul 97 15:27 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa06587;
12 Jul 97 15:27 BST
Received: (qmail 290 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 14:27:22 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 14:27:22 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (PAA14196); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 15:17:36 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 15:17:28 +0100
Received: from 0@mhub2.tc.umn.edu [128.101.131.52] by hermes via SMTP (PAA14193); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 15:17:26 +0100
Received: from pub-15-c-171.dialup.umn.edu by mhub2.tc.umn.edu; Sat, 12 Jul 97 09:17:36 -0500
X-Sender: tren0009@tren0009.email.umn.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: "Thomas R. Trenka"
Subject: Advertisements on the list...
Message-Id: <33c792012a19002@mhub2.tc.umn.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 97 09:17:37 -0500
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hello everyone--
I'm wondering if anyone else has been getting some of the advertisements
sent over this list lately (like the one I just got for "SexSwap") and if
they have, if there is anyway we can prevent things like this (definitely
unrelated to CSound) from being propigated....
Just find it a huge surprise to be perusing the latest ideas only to be
blitzed with adult advertising...
Anyone else feel the same way?
Thomas Trenka
tren0009@tc.umn.edu
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21818;
12 Jul 97 16:58 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa06758;
12 Jul 97 16:58 BST
Received: (qmail 374 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 15:58:11 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 15:58:11 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (QAA16003); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 16:50:14 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 16:50:05 +0100
Received: from mailrelay1.pavilion.net [194.242.128.25] by hermes via ESMTP (QAA15988); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 16:50:04 +0100
Received: from [194.242.131.37] (dialup0-37.pavilion.co.uk [194.242.131.37])
by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA16127
for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 16:49:41 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199707121549.QAA16127@florence.pavilion.net>
X-Sender: hbyrne@mailhost.pavilion.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 16:54:18 +0000
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Per Villez
Subject: Re: Advertisements on the list...
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Yes, I've just got one too.
How can it be can we get rid of these?
Per Byrne Villez
>Hello everyone--
>
>I'm wondering if anyone else has been getting some of the advertisements
>sent over this list lately (like the one I just got for "SexSwap") and if
>they have, if there is anyway we can prevent things like this (definitely
>unrelated to CSound) from being propigated....
>
>Just find it a huge surprise to be perusing the latest ideas only to be
>blitzed with adult advertising...
>
>Anyone else feel the same way?
>
>Thomas Trenka
>tren0009@tc.umn.edu
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21928;
12 Jul 97 18:03 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa06911;
12 Jul 97 18:03 BST
Received: (qmail 451 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 17:03:03 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 17:03:03 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (RAA17424); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 17:56:20 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 17:56:08 +0100
Received: from mercury.acs.unt.edu [129.120.1.1] by hermes via ESMTP (RAA17403); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 17:56:06 +0100
Received: from jove.acs.unt.edu (3045@jove.acs.unt.edu [129.120.1.41])
by mercury.acs.unt.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11042
for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 11:56:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (mat0001@localhost)
by jove.acs.unt.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA18476
for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 11:56:03 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 11:56:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: Micheal Allen Thompson
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: quad panning
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Anybody have any information on quad panning in Csound. I have tried a
bunch of things but none of them work the way I want them.
Thanks
Michael
BTW has anybody compiled csound on BeOS? I would like to see your makefile
and any changes to the code you made... if that is ok?
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21934;
12 Jul 97 18:04 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa06922;
12 Jul 97 18:03 BST
Received: (qmail 457 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 17:03:48 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 17:03:48 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (RAA17365); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 17:55:35 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 17:55:26 +0100
Received: from rooster.cisco.com [171.68.110.251] by hermes via ESMTP (RAA17350); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 17:55:23 +0100
Received: from rtp-cse-177.cisco.com (rtp-cse-177.cisco.com [171.68.109.64]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.6.11/server/940815) with SMTP id MAA23650; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 12:55:05 -0400
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 12:55:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Tannous
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Cc: Per Villez
Subject: Re: Advertisements on the list...
In-Reply-To: <199707121549.QAA16127@florence.pavilion.net>
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
This is real annoying. I've tried
sending polite email (to no avail) 8-(
Appears to be coming from hotmail.com:
-----------------------
% whois hotmail.com
[rs.internic.net]
Hotmail Corporation (HOTMAIL-DOM)
1290 Oakmead Parkway Suite 218
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
US
Domain Name: HOTMAIL.COM
Administrative Contact:
Smith, Rex (SR247-ORG) rexspm@HOTMAIL.COM
408-222-7000 Fax- 408-222-7020
Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Goldsmith, Joshua (JG39) joshin@HOTMAIL.COM
(408) 222-7005 ext. 154
Billing Contact:
Smith, Rex (SR247-ORG) rexspm@HOTMAIL.COM
408-222-7000 Fax- 408-222-7020
--------------------------------------------
And their provider appears to be:
% whois 207.181.94.0
[rs.internic.net]
Netcom Canada Inc. (NETBLK-NETCOM-CA-BLK1)
905 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario M6K 3G9
Canada
Netname: NETCOM-CA-BLK1
Netblock: 207.181.64.0 - 207.181.127.255
Maintainer: NCCA
Coordinator:
Popaduke, Adam (AP531) adamp@NETCOM.CA
416-341-5753
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
TOR-NS1.NETCOM.CA 207.93.1.4
TOR-NS2.NETCOM.CA 207.93.1.5
ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
Record last updated on 13-Jan-97.
Database last updated on 12-Jul-97 04:23:14 EDT.
The InterNIC Registration Services Host contains ONLY Internet Information
(Networks, ASN's, Domains, and POC's).
Please use the whois server at nic.ddn.mil for MILNET Information.
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: owner-csound-outgoing@noether.ex.ac.uk
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (mailgate-sj-1.cisco.com [198.92.30.31])
by
rooster.cisco.com (8.6.11/server/940815) with ESMTP id TAA00165 for
; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 19:10:02 -0400
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (hermes.ex.ac.uk [194.83.11.25]) by
hubbub.cisco.com
(8.8.4-Cisco.1/CISCO.GATE..1.1) with SMTP id QAA16100 for
; Fri,
11 Jul 1997 16:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (AAA27873); Sat,
12 Jul
1997 00:08:10 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97
00:02:53 +0100
Received: from root@loki.atcon.com [199.166.213.6] by hermes via ESMTP
(AAA27713);
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 00:02:51 +0100
From: linkhost@hotmail.com
Received: from hotmail.com (hal-ns1-05.netcom.ca [207.181.94.69]) by
loki.atcon.com
(8.8.5/1.359) with SMTP id SAA09349; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 18:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 18:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199707112215.SAA09349@loki.atcon.com>
To: linkhost@hotmail.com
Subject: At Last ! FREE HITS from SexSwap
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@noether.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Sexswap is an effective hit generator that concentrates
---------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 12 Jul 1997, Per Villez wrote:
> Yes, I've just got one too.
> How can it be can we get rid of these?
> Per Byrne Villez
>
> >Hello everyone--
> >
> >I'm wondering if anyone else has been getting some of the advertisements
> >sent over this list lately (like the one I just got for "SexSwap") and if
> >they have, if there is anyway we can prevent things like this (definitely
> >unrelated to CSound) from being propigated....
> >
> >Just find it a huge surprise to be perusing the latest ideas only to be
> >blitzed with adult advertising...
> >
> >Anyone else feel the same way?
> >
> >Thomas Trenka
> >tren0009@tc.umn.edu
>
>
>
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21967;
12 Jul 97 18:30 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa06988;
12 Jul 97 18:30 BST
Received: (qmail 486 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 17:30:01 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 17:30:01 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA18066); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:22:47 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 18:22:36 +0100
Received: from toaster.berksys.com [192.216.216.1] by hermes via ESMTP (SAA18062); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:22:34 +0100
Received: from waffle.berksys.com by toaster.berksys.com via ESMTP (950413.SGI.8.6.12/951211.SGI)
for id KAA10312; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:21:49 -0700
Received: from [192.216.218.47] (pjsonnichsen.berksys.com [192.216.218.47]) by waffle.berksys.com (8.6.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id KAA15247 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:13:21 -0700
X-Sender: pjs@mail.berksys.com
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 22:28:24 +0505
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: "P.J. Sonnichsen"
Subject: Re: Advertisements on the list...
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
I'd wager everyone on this list feels the same way! We're being "spammed".
Does anyone on this list have experience succesfully dealing with this kind
of thing?
- P.J.
"Never mistake motion for progress."
- Socrates
>Hello everyone--
>
>I'm wondering if anyone else has been getting some of the advertisements
>sent over this list lately (like the one I just got for "SexSwap") and if
>they have, if there is anyway we can prevent things like this (definitely
>unrelated to CSound) from being propigated....
>
>Just find it a huge surprise to be perusing the latest ideas only to be
>blitzed with adult advertising...
>
>Anyone else feel the same way?
>
>Thomas Trenka
>tren0009@tc.umn.edu
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22016;
12 Jul 97 19:30 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa07192;
12 Jul 97 19:29 BST
Received: (qmail 539 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 18:29:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 18:29:34 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (TAA19271); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 19:21:27 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 19:21:17 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by hermes via SMTP (TAA19259); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 19:21:15 +0100
Received: (qmail 26846 invoked by uid 1964); 12 Jul 1997 18:21:25 -0000
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 11:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Matt J. Ingalls"
To: Micheal Allen Thompson
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: quad panning
In-Reply-To:
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi Micheal,
i have done a few pieces recently in quad - using Csound.ppc. Since could
only HEAR quad out of our Pro-Tools I using DECKII (the piece of shit that
it is), i made 2 copies of my quad orc - one for front speakers, one for
back. Then ran them in a batch, dumped them into DECK, split the channels
to mono,etc... a BIG PAIN!
If this could be any use to anybody:
here is a pretty simple orc/sco that i have been using to play samples --
almost always with a "granular" - generated score.
(take the ';'s out of all the "front" lines to get all 4
channels!)
-m
sr = 44100
kr = 2205
ksmps = 20
nchnls = 2
instr 1
;---------------------------------------;
; soundin instrument quad-front ;
; matt ingalls ;
;
;
; p3=dur p4=Amp ;
; p5=rise p6=decay ;
; p7=pitch p8=file ;
; p9=pan(0-1) p10=panquant(0=off) ;
; p11=skip time ;
; p12=distance (speakers = 1) ;
;
;
;---------------------------------------;
iamp = p4/p12
;--- determine pitch, file ---
ifile = int(p8 + 50)
isize table p8 - 1,50,0,0,0
;---- panning ----
ipan = (p10 > 1 ? int(p9*p10)/p10 : p9)
;ipanfl tablei ipan,1,1,.375,1
;ipanfr tablei ipan,1,1,.125,1
ipanbl tablei ipan,1,1,.625,1
ipanbr tablei ipan,1,1,.875,1
;--- reading soundin ---
andx phasor p7*sr/isize,0
aout tablei isize*andx,ifile,0,p11*sr,1
;---- enveloping ----
kenvel linen iamp,p5,p3,p6
;aoutfl = kenvel*aout*ipanfl
;aoutfr = kenvel*aout*ipanfr
aoutbl = kenvel*aout*ipanbl
aoutbr = kenvel*aout*ipanbr
;------send signals to reverb unit--------;
;gaglobl = (aoutfl + aoutfr)/sqrt(p12)
galocll = aoutbl * (p12 - 1)
galoclr = aoutbr * (p12 - 1)
outs aoutbl, aoutbr
endin
;put your own reverb instr here...
--->now the score
; quad.sco matt ingalls ;
;
;
; p3=dur p4=Amp ;
; p5=rise p6=decay ;
; p7=pitch p8=file ;
; p9=pan(0-1) p10=panquant(0=off) ;
; p11=skip time ;
; p12=distance (speakers = 1) ;
;
;
;---------------------------------------;
; this table is the panning transfer function, prob. could use some sort
;of GEN09 for this instead..
f1 0 512 5 .0001 16 .3536 16 .5 16 .61 16 .707 16
.79 16 .866 16 .935 16 1 16 .935 16 .866 16 .79 16 .707 16 .61 16 .5 16
.3536 16 .0001
; this table is a list of the "actual" size of the sound files, starting
; with f51
f50 0 2 -2 1717204 817727
f51 0 1048576 -1 "decays.snd" 0 0 0
f52 0 1048576 -1 "had.snd" 0 0 0
;add more sound files here...
; Generated Gesture from 0.0000 to 20.0000 seconds
; with a p-max of 12
i1 0.0000 0.1000 1.0000 0.0030 0.0900 0.8933 4.0000 0.0000
0.0000 4.9589 16.4556
i1 3.2659 0.1000 1.0000 0.0030 0.0900 0.9073 4.0000 0.9798
0.0000 4.9665 11.6093
i1 4.9839 0.1000 1.0000 0.0030 0.0900 0.9150 4.0000 1.4952
0.0000 4.9266 9.4637
i1 5.9918 0.1000 1.0000 0.0030 0.0900 0.9365 4.0000 1.7976
0.0000 4.8977 7.4961
;etc......
e
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22267;
12 Jul 97 22:46 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa07509;
12 Jul 97 22:45 BST
Received: (qmail 717 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 21:45:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 21:45:52 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (WAA22924); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 22:37:53 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 22:37:43 +0100
Received: from lt@westnet.com [206.24.6.2] by hermes via ESMTP (WAA22921); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 22:37:42 +0100
Received: from localhost (lt@localhost)
by westnet.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id RAA20012;
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 17:37:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 17:37:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Larry Troxler
To: "P.J. Sonnichsen"
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Advertisements on the list...
In-Reply-To:
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
On Sat, 12 Jul 1997, P.J. Sonnichsen wrote:
> I'd wager everyone on this list feels the same way! We're being "spammed".
> Does anyone on this list have experience succesfully dealing with this kind
> of thing?
>
My ISP has filtered out know spam sources using procmail. You can also do
this yourself if you know how to use procmail (I don't know enough about
it to coach you).
This helps somewhat. For instance, I never saw the spam from hotmail on
this list.
Larry
-- Larry Troxler -- lt@westnet.com -- Patterson, NY USA --
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22309;
12 Jul 97 23:56 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa07581;
12 Jul 97 23:55 BST
Received: (qmail 808 invoked from network); 12 Jul 1997 22:55:39 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 12 Jul 1997 22:55:39 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (XAA23995); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:44:39 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sat, 12 Jul 97 23:44:30 +0100
Received: from GS160.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.203.172] by hermes via SMTP (XAA23988); Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:44:23 +0100
Message-Id: <199707122244.XAA23988@hermes>
Subject: Re: Advertisements on the list...
To: Csound mailing list
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:44:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Eli Brandt
In-Reply-To: from "Larry Troxler" at Jul 12, 97 05:37:52 pm
X-Portmanteau: pantryptaminergeticallysisterrainbowtie
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 419
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Larry Troxler wrote:
> This helps somewhat. For instance, I never saw the spam from hotmail on
> this list.
Another approach is for the list server to allow posting only from
subscribers. This disallows the occasional legit message, and
requires some fine-tuning for people whose send and receive addresses
don't match, but it does kill spam.
--
Eli Brandt | eli+@cs.cmu.edu | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22472;
13 Jul 97 2:10 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa07839;
13 Jul 97 2:09 BST
Received: (qmail 950 invoked from network); 13 Jul 1997 01:09:37 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 13 Jul 1997 01:09:37 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (CAA26294); Sun, 13 Jul 1997 02:00:35 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sun, 13 Jul 97 02:00:25 +0100
Received: from relay-7.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.7] by hermes via SMTP (CAA26291); Sun, 13 Jul 1997 02:00:23 +0100
Received: from rasmith.demon.co.uk ([194.222.206.253]) by punt-2.mail.demon.net
id aa0613993; 13 Jul 97 0:44 BST
From: richard s
To: mailing list
Subject: lo-fi
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 00:43:18 +0100
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <868751078.0613993.0@rasmith.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
I've not been using CSound for long, and I'm new to this list...I hope
someone can help me out here....
I've written an orchestra and score just to try things out and I'm hearing
some distortion. Its not the first time I've had Csound generate
"background noise" etc. I don't understand how this can happen in
non-realtime syntesis!
I'm using WinSound from the Bath site on an MMX 166 with a crappy
soundblaster card. Would anybody be kind enough to compile the following on
their setup & tell me if its OK. Is my programme at fault, or my card, or
my computer or (most unlikely I'm sure :) ) the Csound programme?
Listen out for the slight distortion at the beginning of each "bell" impact
(no clipping shows up on the waveform, and no samples are out of range).
Millions of thanks & best wishes,
Richard Smith
THE INSTRUMENT:
sr=44000
kr=200
ksmps=220
nchnls=2
ale init 0
ari init 0
galeft init 0
garight init 0
instr 1
iscl=(p6+1) ;scale volume to flag
ivs=(p12/100)
kvol linseg 0, 0.05, p18, p19, p20, p21-p19, p22, p23-p21,p24,
(p3-p23)-0.05, p25, 0.03, 0 ;vl Cnt(0-100)
kpn linseg p26, p28, p27, p29-p28, p27, p3-p29, p30 ; Pan Cnt (-1 to 1)
kpan=kpn*22/7
ist=(p4<17 ? cpspch(p4) : p4)
ien=(p5<17 ? cpspch(p5) : p5)
kpch linseg ien, p3, ien
kvibamp linseg p13, p15, p14, p16-p15, p14, p3-p16, p17 ; vib depth 0-100
kvib1 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31, 4
kvib2 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31+p31*ivs, 4
kvib3 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31+p31*(ivs*0.82), 4
kvib4 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31+p31*(ivs*0.592), 4
kvib5 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31+p31*(ivs*0.405), 4
kvib6 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31+p31*(ivs*0.234), 4
kvib7 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31-p31*(ivs*.942), 4
kvib8 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31-p31*(ivs*.792), 4
kvib9 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31-p31*(ivs*.541), 4
kvib10 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31-p31*(ivs*.341), 4
kvib11 oscil kvibamp*kpch, p31-p31*(ivs*.17), 4
kchor linseg p7, p9, p8, p10-p9, p8, p3-p10, p11; chor.env
a1 oscil kvol*70/iscl, kpch+(kvib1*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000, p32
a2 oscil kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib2*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000+(kchor*kpch/2200), p32
a3 oscil kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib7*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000-(kchor*kpch/2300), p32
a4 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib3*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000-(0.842*kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a5 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib8*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000-(0.611*kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a6 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib4*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000-(0.391*kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a7 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib9*kpch-(kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000-(0.154*kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a8 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib5*kpch-(0.83*kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000+(kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a9 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib10*kpch-(0.62*kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000+(kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a10 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib6*kpch-(0.442*kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000+(kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a11 oscil p6*kvol*70/iscl,
kpch+(kvib11*kpch-(0.253*kvibamp*kpch/2))/500000+(kchor* kpch/2300), p32
a100=0.75*a1+ 1*a2+ 0.95*a4+ 0.89*a6+ 0.80*a8+ 0.68*a10+ 0.5*a3+ 0.4*a5+
0.3+a7+ 0.2*a9
a200=0.75*a1+ 0*a2+ 0.2*a4+ 0.3*a6+ 0.4*a8+ 0.5*a10+ 0.68*a3+ 0.8*a5+
0.89*a7+ 0.95*a9 +a11
ale=a100*(kpan<0 ? 2: cos(kpan)+1) + a200*(kpan<0 ? cos(kpan-22/7)+1:0)
ari=a100*(kpan<0 ? 0: cos(kpan-22/7)+1) + a200*(kpan<0 ? cos(kpan)+1 :2)
outs ale*.25, ari*.25
galeft=galeft+ale
garight=garight+ari
outs ale*0.25, ari*0.25
endin
instr 2
a1 oscil 0,200,1
endin
instr 3
aleftrev reverb galeft, p4
arightrev reverb garight, p4
outs aleftrev*p5*0.5, arightrev*p5*0.5
galeft=0
garight=0
endin
THE SCORE
f1 0 2048 10 1 1 1 1 .7 .5 .3 .1
f2 0 2048 10 1 0 .3 0 .2 0 .14 0 .111
f3 0 2048 10 1 .5 .3 .25 .2 .167 .14 .125 .111
f4 0 2048 10 1
; st dur spch epch chflg Chorus Envelpope vOf Vibrato Envelope Volume
Envelope Pan vibr voice
; a b c d e a b c d e a (x y) (x y) (x y) z a b c d e
i1 0 8 3000 3000 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0 0.7 5 6
-1 6 4
i1 0.8 7 4732 4732 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.3 0.7
5 6 -1 6 4
i1 1.5 6 1378 1378 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.2 0.7 5
6 -1 6 4
i1 2.1 5 732 732 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.1 0.7 5 6
-1 6 4
i1 2.6 6 4378 4378 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.2 0.7
5 6 -1 6 4
i1 3 6 3529 3529 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0 0.7 5 6
-1 6 4
i1 3.35 6 2463 2436 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.45 0.7
5 6 -1 6 4
i1 3.65 6 1132 1132 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.6 0.7
5 6 -1 6 4
i1 3.9 6 3654 3654 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.1 0.7 5
6 -1 6 4
i1 4.1 6 364 364 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.9 0.7 5
6 -1 6 4
i1 4.35 6 1274 1274 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 1 0.7 5
6 -1 6 4
i1 4.45 6 265 265 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -1 0.7 5 6
-1 6 4
i1 4.45 10 265 265 1 0 5 3 5 70 30 0 0 3 5 100 0 5 60 7.5 40 8.5 10 0 -1
0.7 5 6 -1 6 1
i1 5.3 7 4732 4732 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.3 0.7
5 6 -1 6 1
i1 6 6 1378 1378 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.2 0.7 5 6
-1 6 1
i1 6.6 5 732 732 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.1 0.7 5 6
-1 6 1
i1 7.1 6 4378 4378 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.2 0.7
5 6 -1 6 1
i1 7.5 6 3529 3529 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0 0.7 5 6
-1 6 1
i1 7.85 6 2463 2436 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.45 0.7
5 6 -1 6 1
i1 8.15 6 1132 1132 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.6 0.7
5 6 -1 6 1
i1 8.4 6 3654 3654 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 0.1 0.7 5
6 -1 6 1
i1 8.6 6 364 364 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -0.9 0.7 5
6 -1 6 1
i1 8.85 6 1274 1274 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 1 0.7 5
6 -1 6 1
i1 8.95 6 265 265 1 6 6 3 4 6 30 0 0 1 2 0 40 0.4 20 4 2 4.1 2 0 -1 0.7 5 6
-1 6 1
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22644;
13 Jul 97 3:31 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11874;
13 Jul 97 3:30 BST
Received: (qmail 1011 invoked from network); 13 Jul 1997 02:30:54 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 13 Jul 1997 02:30:54 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (DAA27641); Sun, 13 Jul 1997 03:22:21 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sun, 13 Jul 97 03:22:05 +0100
Received: from chasque.apc.org [206.99.54.1] by hermes via ESMTP (DAA27633); Sun, 13 Jul 1997 03:22:01 +0100
Received: from default (a102.chasque.apc.org [206.99.54.102])
by chasque.apc.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA16664;
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:22:46 +0300 (GMT)
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970713022258.0082b7a4@chasque.apc.org>
X-Sender: psotuyo@chasque.apc.org (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 23:22:58 -0300
To: "Thomas R. Trenka" , csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: Pablo Sotuyo
Subject: Re: Advertisements on the list...
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi you all out there,
I didn't know anything about this "hit generator".
I looked for it at bath server but I couldn't find it at all... (I
confess I didn't search in Montreal ;)))
Knowing those lovely sounds that could be generated through sex...
Can anybody explain to me how should a "sexswap hit generator" be designed?
I suppose it needs a pair of plugged-in starting units (being
conservative ;)), with a pre-existing COMB treatment, silk envelope, a
table, with lots of reinit steps (an Alpass statement could be just fine
also) in the middle, and a rand unit to control the stereo output...
Any other ideas? ;)))
Cheers,
Pablo.
P.S.: Being serious... I feel the same way as you, Thomas.
At 09:17 12/07/97 -0500, Thomas R. Trenka wrote:
>Hello everyone--
>
>I'm wondering if anyone else has been getting some of the advertisements
>sent over this list lately (like the one I just got for "SexSwap") and if
>they have, if there is anyway we can prevent things like this (definitely
>unrelated to CSound) from being propigated....
>
>Just find it a huge surprise to be perusing the latest ideas only to be
>blitzed with adult advertising...
>
>Anyone else feel the same way?
>
>Thomas Trenka
>tren0009@tc.umn.edu
-----------------------------------------------
Pablo Sotuyo Blanco
Composer - French Horn Player
4th French Horn of the City Hall Symphonic Band
Luppo Music (Sounds & Casuals) Editor
-----------------------------------------------
Tomas de Tezanos 1329
CP 11.300 Buceo
Montevideo - Uruguay
mailto:psotuyo@chasque.apc.org
-----------------------------------------------
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22876;
13 Jul 97 9:41 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa12289;
13 Jul 97 9:41 BST
Received: (qmail 1206 invoked from network); 13 Jul 1997 08:41:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (194.83.11.25)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 13 Jul 1997 08:41:09 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (JAA09350); Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:30:44 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Sun, 13 Jul 97 09:30:38 +0100
Received: from root@www.snafu.de [194.121.224.3] by hermes via SMTP (JAA09346); Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:30:34 +0100
Received: by berlin.snafu.de (Smail3.2)
from 194.64.15.4.snafu.de (192.109.99.25) with smtp
id ; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 10:30:41 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970713102650.007c1660@berlin.snafu.de>
X-Sender: rubo@berlin.snafu.de
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 10:27:04 +0200
To: richard s ,
mailing list
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger_?= Borrmann
Subject: Re: lo-fi
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Dear Richard,
...
>some distortion. Its not the first time I've had Csound generate
>"background noise" etc.
>
>I'm using WinSound from the Bath site on an MMX 166
o.k.
> with a crappy soundblaster card.
noisy anyway, so sometimes it's difficult to tell where that noise comes from
> Would anybody be kind enough to compile the following on
>their setup & tell me if its OK.
did it and all I could find was that your orchestra settings are quite unusal
to me.
sr=44000
kr=200
ksmps=220
nchnls=2
>
>Listen out for the slight distortion at the beginning of each "bell" impact
>(no clipping shows up on the waveform, and no samples are out of range).
Yes you are right. There is a digital distortion at the beginning of each bell
with your settings.
I changed it to
sr=44100
kr=44100
ksmps=1
nchnls=2
This takes a whole lot more of calculation time, but the result is
highhighhigh-fi without distortion, because there's no room for
approximation ...
Best regards
Ruediger Borrmann
rubo@berlin.snafu.de
http://www.snafu.de/~rubo/songlab/midi2cs
|