| In further testing it transpires that a simple editing error have made
the rand opcode broken in teh case of 16bit random numbers and a-rate
answer. Thsi is so bad that I will replace all the systems on Monday.
The new version also allows ^ in expressions for pow, but otherwise is
musch as before.
==John
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00643;
22 Nov 98 15:14 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 0zhbDj-0002KP-00; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:14:39 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (PAA23910); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:13:38 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:13:25 GMT
Received: from exim@wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk [138.38.100.104] by hermes via ESMTP (PAA18534); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:13:24 GMT
Received: from [138.38.97.36] (helo=maths.Bath.AC.UK ident=mmdf)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
id 0zhbCa-0002KH-00; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:13:28 +0000
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 98 15:13:27 GMT
From: J P Fitch
To: Jamie Bullock
cc: Csound List
Subject: Re: csound-orc.el
Message-Id:
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
ftp.maths.bath.ac.uk:pub/dream/utilities/Emacs-macros/
is where teh csound emacs modes live.
==John
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00719;
22 Nov 98 16:27 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 0zhcMW-0002NH-00; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 16:27:48 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (QAA17311); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 16:26:48 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 16:26:38 GMT
Received: from root@skye1.skyenet.net [162.142.242.20] by hermes via ESMTP (QAA09887); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 16:26:36 GMT
Received: from skynet.net (skye-oc03-46.statewideweb.com [208.141.202.155] (may be forged))
by skye1.skyenet.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA32696
for ; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:26:32 -0500
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:26:32 -0500
Message-Id: <199811221626.LAA32696@skye1.skyenet.net>
X-Sender: ada@pop.skyenet.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: "A. Archias"
Subject: Re; Hello "a Csound Fan"
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hello to List;
I have been on this list for quite some time. I can "appreciate" the amount of
effort that JPF and others are contributing to this project. Hopefully I
could contribute something sometime.
I am still working on setting up my mini-studio at home, it takes money and
time. By trade I design Power amplifiers ranging from 1 watt to 50,000 watts
for the ProAudio and Medical industry. My spare time,(what little I have) is
experimenting with Synthesis (using Csound w WCShell and various hardware
synths) and building speakers and small room acoustics, multichannel sound.
I have written some synth software in Turbo 6 and now working w VB4 and Delphi.
I have been experimenting with some of the Spectral enhancing samples stuff
and others controling keyboard via midi w G. Maldonado's version.
I just want to say I find this (Csound) very interesting and lets me free
to explore. I think Csound will have an interesting future and many
applications.
A.A.
Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00881;
22 Nov 98 18:26 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 0zheDX-0002SP-00; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:26:39 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA19390); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:25:28 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:25:20 GMT
Received: from root@lix.intercom.es [194.179.21.2] by hermes via ESMTP (SAA07432); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:25:18 GMT
Received: from intercom.es (iv2-79.intercom.es [195.76.206.79]) by lix.intercom.es (8.7.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA14567; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 19:27:16 +0100
Message-ID: <365856D9.15D694EE@intercom.es>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 19:24:25 +0100
From: Josep M Comajuncosas
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gabriel Maldonado
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: PhM out of tune
References: <3657E6B6.8CA046AE@intercom.es> <3657F004.4E7B6C87@agora.stm.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id SAA07432
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
> I noticed that the same problem is presente even in the plucked string =
model. Probably it
> depends by the fact that the delay of the filter is still non-fraction=
al. For example,
> when no filter is present in the string model, the pitch of high notes =
is OK. I suppose
> (but I'm not sure) that also filter coefficients should change when cha=
nging pitch.
The correct way should be changing appropiately the delay line when chang=
ing the pitch *or*
the filter coeff. (to make the sound brighter or duller). A onepole lowpa=
ss filter doesn=B4t
cause a group delay bigger than 1 sample, am I wrong? so its effect is as=
much bigger as the
possibly non-fractional delay of the delay line.Btw, wouldn=B4t higher no=
tes be more sensitive
to pitch differences than lower ones?
Thancks for all.
Josep M Comajuncosas
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa02570;
23 Nov 98 11:03 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 0zhtme-00050s-00; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:03:56 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (KAA20702); Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:59:34 GMT
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:59:18 GMT
Received: from agora.stm.it [195.62.32.1] by hermes via ESMTP (KAA02434); Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:59:14 GMT
Received: from agora.stm.it (ppp02-05.dial-access.stm.it [195.62.37.69]) by agora.stm.it (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA06909; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:57:47 +0100 (ITA)
Message-ID: <365940FC.1D9332C1@agora.stm.it>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:03:24 +0100
From: Gabriel Maldonado
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Josep M Comajuncosas
CC: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: PhM out of tune
References: <3657E6B6.8CA046AE@intercom.es> <3657F004.4E7B6C87@agora.stm.it> <365856D9.15D694EE@intercom.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by exeter.ac.uk id KAA02434
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Josep M Comajuncosas wrote:
> possibly non-fractional delay of the delay line.Btw, wouldn=B4t higher =
notes be more sensitive
> to pitch differences than lower ones?
Exactly! An empiric solution would be building an adjusted pitch table wh=
ich rises the
frequecy according to the pitch error in high notes.
--=20
Gabriel Maldonado
http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/home2.htm
Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa02755;
23 Nov 98 12:06 GMT
Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk)
by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2)
for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
id 0zhule-00054r-00; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:06:58 +0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (MAA00898); Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:02:19 GMT
Received: from sunny.ex.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:47:33 GMT
Received: from web04b.farm.aol.com [152.175.33.2] by sunny via SMTP (LAA15783); Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:47:34 GMT
Received: from [207.241.63.160] (poolf3-031.wwa.com [207.241.63.160]) by web04b.farm.aol.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id GAA02295 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 06:46:52 -0500
Message-Id: <199811231146.GAA02295@web04b.farm.aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 06:04:30 -0600
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: =cw4t7abs
Subject: Re: PhM out of tune
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
>Josep M Comajuncosas wrote:
>
>> possibly non-fractional delay of the delay line.Btw, wouldn=B4t higher no=
tes
>>be more sensitive
>> to pitch differences than lower ones?
>
>Exactly! An empiric solution would be building an adjusted pitch table whic=
h
>rises the
>frequecy according to the pitch error in high notes.
bl!ev karplus strong algo !mplmentz
|