Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

any 'c' sources for PowerMac of the csound

Date1997-09-05 13:35
FromEmanuele Pascucci
Subjectany 'c' sources for PowerMac of the csound
I'm looking for any sources of the Csound
for the Codewarrior 9 or above.PowerMac enviroment.

thank emanuele



Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11503;
          5 Sep 97 18:12 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa19594;
          5 Sep 97 18:11 BST
Received: (qmail 19810 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 17:11:22 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 17:11:22 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA18191); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:04:53 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 5 Sep 97 18:04:46 +0100
Received: from qmailr@pat.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.2] by hermes via SMTP (SAA14035); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:04:45 +0100
Message-Id: <199709051704.SAA14035@hermes>
Received: (qmail 19434 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 17:05:27 -0000
Received: from omphalos.maths.bath.ac.uk (HELO maths.Bath.AC.UK) (mmdf@138.38.99.25)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 17:05:27 -0000
Date:     Fri, 5 Sep 97 18:06:15 BST
From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Subject:  Re: Version 4.00? was Version 3.47?
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Message written at 04 Sep 1997 23:43:22 -0400
--- Copy of mail to hljmm@discover-net.net ---
In-reply-to: 
	(message from Hans Mikelson on Sat, 16 Aug 97 15:20:46 PDT)

What 16-bit things are you seeing?  Csound works in floating point
internally, which is typically 24bits scaled.

Cannot help you on the analog oscilator -- never used analog.

==John ffitch



Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11558;
          5 Sep 97 18:22 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20043;
          5 Sep 97 18:21 BST
Received: (qmail 20318 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 17:21:18 -0000
Received: from condor.cc.umontreal.ca (132.204.2.103)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 17:21:18 -0000
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.70]) by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id NAA04387
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:19:02 -0400
Received: from mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17)
	id NAA06733; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:19:01 -0400
Received: from GAP by mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17)
	id NAA21288; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:18:58 -0400
Sender: pichej@ere.umontreal.ca
Message-ID: <34103ECA.3B54@ere.umontreal.ca>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 13:18:02 -0400
From: Jean Piche 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.3 IP32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
CC: csound 
Subject: Re: Version 4.00? was Version 3.47?
References: <199709051704.SAA14035@hermes>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:

> Cannot help you on the analog oscilator -- never used analog.

...at last the Gods confess.


-- 
________________________________________________________
Jean Piche
Universite de Montreal
http://mistral.ere.umontreal.ca/~pichej
http://www.musique.umontreal.ca/electro/CEC/


Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11592;
          5 Sep 97 18:25 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20208;
          5 Sep 97 18:25 BST
Received: (qmail 20542 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 17:25:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 17:25:02 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA19301); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:20:47 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 5 Sep 97 18:20:39 +0100
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.103] by hermes via ESMTP (SAA21781); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:20:38 +0100
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.70]) by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id NAA04387
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:19:02 -0400
Received: from mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17)
	id NAA06733; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:19:01 -0400
Received: from GAP by mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17)
	id NAA21288; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:18:58 -0400
Message-Id: <34103ECA.3B54@ere.umontreal.ca>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 13:18:02 -0400
From: Jean Piche 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.3 IP32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk
Cc: csound 
Subject: Re: Version 4.00? was Version 3.47?
References: <199709051704.SAA14035@hermes>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote:

> Cannot help you on the analog oscilator -- never used analog.

...at last the Gods confess.


-- 
________________________________________________________
Jean Piche
Universite de Montreal
http://mistral.ere.umontreal.ca/~pichej
http://www.musique.umontreal.ca/electro/CEC/



Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11654;
          5 Sep 97 18:43 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20804;
          5 Sep 97 18:42 BST
Received: (qmail 21458 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 17:42:40 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 17:42:40 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA14458); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:34:13 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 5 Sep 97 18:34:06 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by hermes via SMTP (SAA20539); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:34:04 +0100
Received: (qmail 14184 invoked by uid 2928); 5 Sep 1997 17:34:16 -0000
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Berry 
To: csound 
Subject: Re: Version 4.00? was Version 3.47?
In-Reply-To: <34103ECA.3B54@ere.umontreal.ca>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

	Can someone explain why oscili is perfectly good for making an
analog oscillator?  Opcode bloat has certainly already hit csound hard
(just look at the list that is added in 3.47).

Mike Berry
mikeb@mills.edu





Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11680;
          5 Sep 97 18:53 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa21246;
          5 Sep 97 18:52 BST
Received: (qmail 21914 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 17:51:59 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 17:51:59 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (SAA20814); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:46:44 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 5 Sep 97 18:46:36 +0100
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.103] by hermes via ESMTP (SAA22423); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 18:46:35 +0100
Received: from eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA [132.204.2.70]) by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id NAA05632
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:46:14 -0400
Received: from mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA by eole.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17)
	id NAA12741; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:46:12 -0400
Received: from GAP by mistral.ERE.UMontreal.CA (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/5.17)
	id NAA01352; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:46:09 -0400
Message-Id: <34104529.7D55@ere.umontreal.ca>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 13:45:13 -0400
From: Jean Piche 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SGoldC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.3 IP32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Berry 
Cc: csound 
Subject: Re: Version 4.00? was Version 3.47?
References: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Mike Berry wrote:

> Opcode bloat has certainly already hit csound hard

good firecracker...  more on that?

-- 
________________________________________________________
Jean Piche
Universite de Montreal
http://mistral.ere.umontreal.ca/~pichej
http://www.musique.umontreal.ca/electro/CEC/



Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa11725;
          5 Sep 97 19:32 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa22748;
          5 Sep 97 19:31 BST
Received: (qmail 23935 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1997 18:31:57 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 5 Sep 1997 18:31:57 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (TAA22677); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 19:20:05 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 5 Sep 97 19:19:58 +0100
Received: from ella.mills.edu [144.91.3.20] by hermes via SMTP (TAA19659); Fri, 5 Sep 1997 19:19:55 +0100
Received: (qmail 19964 invoked by uid 2928); 5 Sep 1997 18:20:06 -0000
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 11:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Berry 
Reply-To: Mike Berry 
To: Jean Piche 
Cc: csound 
Subject: Re: Version 4.00? was Version 3.47?
In-Reply-To: <34104529.7D55@ere.umontreal.ca>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Jean Piche wrote:

> Mike Berry wrote:
> 
> > Opcode bloat has certainly already hit csound hard
> 
> good firecracker...  more on that?
> 
> -- 
	If I interpret that correctly as a request for elucidation, then
here it is.  (caveat: this comes from someone who wades around in the
code, for whom added opcodes is a sometimes tedious exercise).
	I think that there are a number of opcodes which are largely
collections of other opcodes, or in which functionality has been largely
duplicated.  Take the MIDI opcodes for example.  We presently have a
different opcode for every kind of midi data, in some cases three opcodes
to retrieve the same data (cpsmidi, octmidi, pchmidi).  Now we will also
have separate opcodes for 7 bit, 14 bit, and 21(?) bit controllers.  Why
not just one single midi opcode?  You could specify what type of data,
what resolution, and what scaling you wanted.
	I know that for backward compatibility reasons no opcode is ever
removed from csound.  But if we're talking about version 4.00 (I know you
didn't mention it jpff), perhaps some pruning is also in order.  It
wouldn't be hard to make an orchestra converter which, for instance, went
through a pre-4.0 orch and changed all of the midi opcodes to a correct
instance of the single midi opcode I just proposed.  It could just fill in
the assumed default values for things (like bit-range) which didn't
previously exist.
	I mention this not just to keep entry.c from becoming 50000 lines
long, but because the proliferation of opcodes considered by itself does
not make csound easier to use.  Yes there are valid opcodes still to be
written.  I don't want to freeze csound at any point.  But we should also
consider ways that the current opcode load could be reduced through
consolidation.

Mike Berry
mikeb@mills.edu