| Sorry, I forgot this in my previouse reply.
Does the SoundBlaster full-duplex problem also explain the "buffering"
effect (can't find a better
word with my english), or just the bad quality I get when suound MANAGES
to get through.
Thnx again.
Yair Kass
Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
> You should be aware of these questions:
> 1) is your computer fast enough to handle real-time?
> 2) is the buffer length ('-b' flag) set to a sufficient dimension (at
> least 500 when using in and out simultaneously)?
> 3) is the number of buffers ('-p' flag) big enough (at least 4)?
> 5) are you using a 'rounded' sr (for example 40000 Hz or 32000 Hz with
> '-e' flag)?
> 6) are you using a Sound Blaster (the soundBlasters wave-in resolution
> is reduced to 8-bit when using full-duplex, but these cards are the
> only I successfully tested. I have two soundblaster in my computer to
> avoid the 8-bit problem).
>
> good luck!
>
> gabriel
>
> Yair Kass wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having trouble using the '-i' flag in RT1.9 .
> > The sound coming in (from mic or line) to Csound,when outputed, is
> >
> > extremely noisy
> > and seem to be "buffered" (?!? maybe the wrong word but it sound
> > like that) and by
> > experimentations, I think I reduced the problem to the '-i' flag
> > [allowing real-time audio in].
> >
> > I double-checked it using the "delay.orc/sco" example.
> >
> > Naturally, I checked the buffer size and ar/kr rates but the
> > problem
> > persists.
> >
> > Is this a known problem ? Did I miss anything obviouse ?
> >
> > H....E....L....P....
> >
> > Yait Kass
>
> --
> Gabriel Maldonado
>
> http://www.agora.stm.it/G.Maldonado/home2.htm
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa25318;
27 Sep 98 9:57 BST
Received: from mercury.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa20975;
27 Sep 98 9:57 BST
Received: (qmail 13607 invoked from network); 27 Sep 1998 08:57:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (HELO exeter.ac.uk) (144.173.6.14)
by mercury.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 27 Sep 1998 08:57:27 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (JAA20340); Sun, 27 Sep 1998 09:54:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 09:53:52 +0100
Received: from send102.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.90] by hermes via SMTP (JAA11090); Sun, 27 Sep 1998 09:53:50 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <19980927085416.12636.rocketmail@send102.yahoomail.com>
Received: from [168.226.49.9] by send102.yahoomail.com; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 01:54:16 PDT
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: ars acustica
Subject: Re: Visual CSound
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk, neuwirth@smc.univie.ac.at
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Hi!
On the Preferences window, you have two text boxes inside a frame
titled "Process with". The first (labeled as "CSound"), serves only to
specify a Csound DOS Protected Mode executable (in example, the 3.485
version form MIT). CS Visual will attempt to execute any EXE declared
here under protected mode, although being a Win32 program (I think
this is what must be occuring).
In the other text box (labeled as "RT Csound") you should put the
Direct CSound path or any other Win32 EXE. Unfortunately, CS Visual
will not appropiately run Direct CSound because some flags differ from
the RT ones.
We did not have time to test Direct CSound, and for this reason no
support is provided in the current version of the shell... I see this
can be a big limitation. We will include as soon as posible support
for Direct CS.
Please let us know any other suggestion or bug, and thanks to try the
program!
Regards.
---neuwirth wrote:
>
> hi,
> i installed visualcs
> and generally speaking i like it.
> you will get more feedback later.
> currently, i have one problem.
>
> i installed it right out of the box,
> with the version sof csound you include.
>
> on my machine,
> i already have gabriel maldonado's directx csound 2.1
> in another directory.
>
> when i tried to change the preferences in visualcs
> so that it would use this version of csound,
> i could not get it to work.
>
> this is what happens ind the dos window:
>
> DOS/4GW Protected Mode Run-time Version 1.97
> Copyright (c) Rational Systems, Inc. 1990-1994
> DOS/4GW fatal error (1008): can't load executable format for file
> C:\MUSIC\VISORC\CSOUND.EXE [1]
>
> so it seems that visualcs tried to launch the protected mode module
> dos4gw.exe in any case,
> even if the actual version of csound is a win32 program already.
>
> is there a workaround?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|