Thanks to all those who replied to my lisp query.  Ta very much indeed.
Cheers
Arne


"...they have an undying thirst for the infinite."
                                                   Lautremont













Received: from stork2.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa29517;
          9 May 97 10:06 BST
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17479;
          9 May 97 10:06 BST
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Fri, 9 May 1997 10:06:26 +0100
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (JAA06110);
          Fri, 9 May 1997 09:55:13 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk;
          Fri, 9 May 97 09:55:05 +0100
Received: from root@salyko.cube.net [194.97.64.2] by hermes 
          via ESMTP (JAA06097); Fri, 9 May 1997 09:55:00 +0100
Received: from orpheus.selene.cube.net(really [194.97.15.225]) 
          by salyko.cube.net	via sendmail 
          with smtp	id 	for ;
          Fri, 9 May 1997 10:55:34 +0200 (MET DST)	(Smail-3.2.0.94 1997-Apr-22 #1 built DST-Apr-24)
Received: from hermes by orpheus.selene.cube.net (NX5.67f2/NX3.0M)	id AA10860;
          Fri, 9 May 97 09:52:20 +0100
Message-Id: <9705090852.AA10860@orpheus.selene.cube.net>
Received: by hermes.selene.cube.net (NX5.67f2/NX3.0X)	id AA00249;
          Fri, 9 May 97 10:52:14 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
Original-Received:  by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2)
PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line
From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?Neub=E4cker?= 
Date: Fri,  9 May 97 10:52:14 +0200
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: gen routines
Reply-To: peter@orpheus.selene.cube.net
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NeXT-Mail-645590422-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

--NeXT-Mail-645590422-1
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable


Richard Wentk wrote:

>I haven't tried it, but my guess is that you can't change the =
sound of an
>instrument after it's started. The sound will only change if you
>reinitialise the instrument - hence no funky wavesequencing =
effects, at
>least not without major effort. Can someone confirm this?=20

It does work! On my system, I have a note running infinitely
and send the new wavetables over a realtime pipe when editing
the wave graphically, and I can hear the sound change.

Peter Neubaecker

--NeXT-Mail-645590422-1
Content-type: text/enriched; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable


Richard Wentk
 wrote:


>I haven't tried it, but my guess is that you can't change the =
sound of an

>instrument after it's started. The sound will only change if you

>reinitialise the instrument - hence no funky wavesequencing =
effects, at

>least not without major effort. Can someone confirm this?=20


It does work! On my system, I have a note running infinitely

and send the new wavetables over a realtime pipe when editing

the wave graphically, and I can hear the sound change.


Peter Neubaecker

--NeXT-Mail-645590422-1--