| At 03:11 AM 10/2/97 -0300, M Perticone wrote:
>hello csounders,
>i am having an interesting "interchange of ideas" (a.k.a arguing) with
>somebody through e-mail.
>any help on this? here's part of his msg.
>> Ok, there seems to be some truth in it. But how will all these musicians
>> get to their great electronic instruments if there is no commercial
>> company to produce them? I haven't heared about a serious and known
>> musician using csound for his productions. Even people like Klaus Schulze
>> or Anne Dudley rather use commercial instruments than csound or software
>> synthesis at all.
>
>i'll be grateful for any info on the subject. you can e-mail me
>privately if you prefer.
>thanks in advance,
>marcello
hmmm...well I may not be Klause Schulze but I have a piece composed entirely
in Csound coming out on CD next year...and I do know for a fact that Richard
James (aka: Aphex Twin) is dabbling in SuperCollider (Mac platform
SSL)...and if you want to talk about serious musicians, there's a slew of
them: Xenakis, Risset, Matthews, Boulanger, Dodge, Chowning just to name a
few...mind you these artists don't have CD's that sell in the millions but
their music is some of the finest works of art ever spit out of a D/A...yes,
hand coding music is not for the faint of heart and certainly is not meant
as a commercial tool but it is a powerful tool that exposes the inner
workings of sound synthesis giving composers a vast array of techniques to
work with...tell your friend that Extended Csound holds promise to deliver
similar hardware realtime functionality that commericial synths do...
peaceOut( )
KIM
________________________
<> kim.cascone <>
<>sound.designer -- headspace<>
/**
*heavenly.music.corporation
* pgr
*/
<>anechoic@sirius.com<>
<>http://www.sirius.com/~anechoic<>
"so many atmospheres, so little time"
____________________________________________________
"the meta-designer creates context, not content"
- Gene Youngblood
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17576;
3 Oct 97 1:14 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa12016;
3 Oct 97 1:14 BST
Received: (qmail 16918 invoked from network); 3 Oct 1997 00:14:53 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Oct 1997 00:14:53 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (AAA20408); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 00:54:04 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 3 Oct 97 00:53:47 +0100
Received: from ulysses.Stanford.EDU [36.49.0.124] by hermes via ESMTP (AAA19396); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 00:53:45 +0100
Received: (from tkunze@localhost) by ulysses.stanford.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA07253; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 16:57:05 -0700
From: Tobias Kunze
Message-Id: <9710021657.ZM7251@ulysses.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 16:57:05 -0700
In-Reply-To: james@maths.exeter.ac.uk
"Re: csound on an O2" (Sep 30, 2:07pm)
References: <12979.199709301307@zeno.maths.exeter.ac.uk>
Reply-To: t@ulysses.stanford.edu
X-Url: http://www.stanford.edu/~tkunze
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: bill@saber.towson.edu, csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: csound on an O2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
| William Kleinsasser wrote
|
| I am also running csound on an O2 with the digital audio (AES/EBU + ADAT)
| card. I can get MIDI in and out through a standard Macintosh interface
| using the MIDI keyboard and sequencer that are part of the sgi media tools
| but csound gives me a 422 error still. I would be *very* interested in
| finding a solution to this problem. Please let me know what you find. I
| also know that Paul Lansky and the Princeton people are running O2s and
| probably are running into the same trouble. Perhaps they have found a
| solution.
csound does not make use of the sgi midi library but instead tries
to access the ports directly. the workaround is to
% stopmidi
before running csound and then
% startmidi
afterwards. as of now, you can not run csound while other midi apps
are running.
-Tobias
--
______________________________________________________________________
Tobias Kunze t@kunze.stanford.edu
CCRMA, Stanford University http://www.stanford.edu/~tkunze
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17645;
3 Oct 97 1:40 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa12429;
3 Oct 97 1:40 BST
Received: (qmail 17465 invoked from network); 3 Oct 1997 00:40:30 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Oct 1997 00:40:30 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (BAA19812); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 01:21:54 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 3 Oct 97 01:21:40 +0100
Received: from [206.30.88.4] by hermes via ESMTP (BAA05372); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 01:21:38 +0100
Received: from [208.151.41.76] by milhouse.infohouse.com
(Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO205e ID# 141-39833U2500L250S0)
with ESMTP id AAA128 for ;
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 21:23:35 -0400
X-Sender: ic11748@mail.infohouse.com
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 20:25:12 -0500
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: tolve
Subject: Re: info request
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
marcello wrote:
>i am having an interesting "interchange of ideas" (a.k.a arguing) with
>somebody through e-mail.
>any help on this? here's part of his msg.
>> Ok, there seems to be some truth in it. But how will all these musicians
>> get to their great electronic instruments if there is no commercial
>> company to produce them? I haven't heared about a serious and known
>> musician using csound for his productions. Even people like Klaus Schulze
>> or Anne Dudley rather use commercial instruments than csound or software
>> synthesis at all.
marcello, the phrase "serious and known" confuses me. is this person
concerned about art or fame?
tolve
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17677;
3 Oct 97 1:58 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa12717;
3 Oct 97 1:58 BST
Received: (qmail 17880 invoked from network); 3 Oct 1997 00:58:28 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Oct 1997 00:58:28 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (BAA08776); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 01:42:35 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 3 Oct 97 01:42:19 +0100
Received: from mail2.panix.com [198.7.0.33] by hermes via ESMTP (BAA04009); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 01:42:18 +0100
Received: from 206.102.224.4 (ppp-remote2.pathfinder.com [206.102.224.4]) by mail2.panix.com (8.8.5/8.7.1/PanixM1.0) with ESMTP id UAA20129; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 20:43:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <343408C6.BB4C54A3@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 20:49:14 +0000
From: Michael Coble
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Arne Hanna
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: virus via email
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Arne Hanna wrote:
>
> One evening over dinner, the question was asked.
> Now people are refusing to speak to each other, the wedding is off, the
> food in the fridge is labelled and use of the living room is on a rostered
> basis.
> Can someone clear this up? Is it or is it not possible to transfer a virus
> via email?
Arne,
One of the most insidious ways to transmit a virus via email is when someone
attaches an infected Microsoft Word or Excel macro. It is probably not clear
to everyone that such attachments are really executable programs and therefore
can be laced with a virus. Microsoft I.E. mailer readers can also carry
ActiveX controls, which can do things to you that you don't want done. As
Pete already revealed, you don't want to execute an attachment that is really
a binary program. So stay away from ActiveX and Microsoft Office attachments
and you should be all right.
Bottom line is to not click on, or otherwise execute program attachments from
strangers:) To my knowledge, there has never been a text message that caused
any weirdness from a mailer...except that time when a cron job sent me a 100
Mbyte STDERR dump, but that's UNIX, and it only forced me to truncate my
mailbox with shell utilities...
> Cheers
> Arne
>
> "The DOLPHIN, desiring to sleep, floats atop the water;having fallen
> asleep,he sinks slowly to the floor of the sea;being awakened by striking
> the bottom,he rises again to the surface. Having thus risen, he falls
> asleep again,descends once more to the bottom, and revives himself anew in
> the same fashion. He thus enjoys his rest in motion."
--
Michael Coble, Time Inc. New Media, Pathfinder
Gallery: http://www.panix.com/~coble, representing various artists
Home: http://pathfinder.com/pathfinder/staff/mcoble/
Work: http://www.pathfinder.com/
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17724;
3 Oct 97 2:20 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa13111;
3 Oct 97 2:20 BST
Received: (qmail 18633 invoked from network); 3 Oct 1997 01:20:42 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Oct 1997 01:20:42 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (CAA22594); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 02:01:00 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 3 Oct 97 02:00:51 +0100
Received: from lt@westnet.com [206.24.6.2] by hermes via ESMTP (CAA09082); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 02:00:50 +0100
Received: from localhost (lt@localhost)
by westnet.com (8.8.6/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA14694;
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 21:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 21:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Larry Troxler
To: Michael Coble
Cc: Arne Hanna , csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: virus via email
In-Reply-To: <343408C6.BB4C54A3@panix.com>
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Michael Coble wrote:
> Arne Hanna wrote:
> >
>
> One of the most insidious ways to transmit a virus via email is when someone
> attaches an infected Microsoft Word or Excel macro. It is probably not clear
> to everyone that such attachments are really executable programs and therefore
> can be laced with a virus. Microsoft I.E. mailer readers can also carry
> ActiveX controls, which can do things to you that you don't want done. As
> Pete already revealed, you don't want to execute an attachment that is really
> a binary program. So stay away from ActiveX and Microsoft Office attachments
> and you should be all right.
Or avoid the Microsoft environment entirely - install Linux :-)
> > "The DOLPHIN, desiring to sleep, floats atop the water;having fallen
> > asleep,he sinks slowly to the floor of the sea;being awakened by striking
> > the bottom,he rises again to the surface. Having thus risen, he falls
> > asleep again,descends once more to the bottom, and revives himself anew in
> > the same fashion. He thus enjoys his rest in motion."
>
I dunno. This doesn't sound very restfull to me. This is a perfect analogy
to what happens in the morning when I repeatedly silence my snooze alarm.
I would be better off if I compensated for it the night before by setting
the alarm for a later time to begin with. I would be just as late for
work, only I would get more interrupted sleep.
-- Larry Troxler -- lt@westnet.com -- Patterson, NY USA --
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17765;
3 Oct 97 2:32 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa13301;
3 Oct 97 2:32 BST
Received: (qmail 18852 invoked from network); 3 Oct 1997 01:32:23 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Oct 1997 01:32:23 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (CAA16004); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 02:11:43 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 3 Oct 97 02:11:35 +0100
Received: from lt@westnet.com [206.24.6.2] by hermes via ESMTP (CAA00807); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 02:11:34 +0100
Received: from localhost (lt@localhost)
by westnet.com (8.8.6/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA15180;
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 21:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 21:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Larry Troxler
To: tolve
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Carefull with spamlike subject lines! (Re: info request)
In-Reply-To:
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
This is really off-topic, but it would be interesting to know whether
anyone else agrees that "info request" is a bad subject for an email
message, because it's likely to be mistaken as spam by the recipient.
Typically when I look at my inbox, there are certain types of subjects
that I almost unconsiously delete without reading - things like "Here's
the information
you requested", "Business opportunity", "Hi!", "New web site", "You
need to read this", etc.
This takes me just a few seconds to do, and typically I toss 3 or 4
messages off the bat when opening my mailbox.
I suppose that I'm throwing away a (very) small fraction of valid mail by
doing
this, but it beats learning to do the same thing automatically with
procmail, which would still have the chance of throwing out valid mail.
I'm curious to know if other people do this as well.
Larry
-- Larry Troxler -- lt@westnet.com -- Patterson, NY USA
--
Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa17782;
3 Oct 97 2:39 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa13538;
3 Oct 97 2:39 BST
Received: (qmail 19005 invoked from network); 3 Oct 1997 01:39:41 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Oct 1997 01:39:41 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (CAA03533); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 02:21:24 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Fri, 3 Oct 97 02:21:17 +0100
Received: from root@skye-op2.skyenet.net [162.142.242.25] by hermes via ESMTP (CAA01394); Fri, 3 Oct 1997 02:21:15 +0100
Received: from ts03-sb-11.skyenet.net (ts03-sb-11.skyenet.net [162.142.243.75]) by skye-op2.skyenet.net (8.8.2/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA22564 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 20:22:58 -0500
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 20:22:58 -0500
Message-Id: <199710030122.UAA22564@skye-op2.skyenet.net>
X-Sender: ada@pop.skyenet.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
From: "A. Archias"
Subject: Re; Csound Utils
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
On Oct 1, jhclouse@juno.com (Jason H Clouse) writes;
Okay. DOS4GW.Exe is a program that allows DOS programs to run in
protected mode. Many DOS programs use it (DOOM, Moray, CSound for DOS,
etc.). You'll need to have this program in your path or in the same
directory as the program that needs it. WinSound doesn't need it because
Windows already runs in protected mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thankyou for sharing that with me, I happened to discover a copy
of DOS4gw.exe on one of my sons games right after I sent the email
I tried it and it let the utils run in protected mode.
Question; Will Hetro put out txt form besides binary? Or do I need
write a prog to read the binary and plot it? Is the format
declarations avail?
I can't find a description/usage of;
Exports.exe
Hetro_expo.exe
Hetro_impo.exe
PV_expo
PV_impo and MIXER
Is there a compiled util listing for all somewhere?
Andy A.
|