Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

unfamiliar csound score format

Date1997-10-07 14:06
FromArne Hanna
Subjectunfamiliar csound score format
Having downloaded the csound dx7 files from
http://www.parnasse.com/dx72csnd.shtml, I'm puzzled about this from the
XyloHrdwd score file:

i01  0 .19 6.00 97 0 0 0 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 2 12000 3 8 4 6 10 9 11 3
; Algorithm = 9
; Patch name is XyloHrdWd\
i 1.1   1.00   .54  6.07    87
i 1.2   2.00   .16  6.08    75
i 1.3     2.49   .20  7.03    65
i 1.4   3.01   .20  7.04    26
i 1   3.50   .18  7.11    10
i 1.1   4.01   .15  8.00    3
i 1.2   4.24   .13  8.07    1
i 1.3     4.50   .07  8.08    72
i 1.4   4.72   .09  9.03    90
i 1   4.98   .16  9.00    79
f0         9                             ;allow for a 4-beat final decay.
e

The first score line has 25 pfields, but thereafter only 5.  Is this
something to do with ihold in the dx731.orc file? And why i01 ?

Cheers
Arne




"...for they have an undying thirst for the infinite"
                                               Lautremont





Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa04792;
          7 Oct 97 15:10 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00632;
          7 Oct 97 15:10 BST
Received: (qmail 24074 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1997 14:10:00 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Oct 1997 14:10:00 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (PAA15498); Tue, 7 Oct 1997 15:00:21 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Tue, 7 Oct 97 14:59:46 +0100
Received: from talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk [193.37.225.1] by hermes via ESMTP (OAA07420); Tue, 7 Oct 1997 14:19:25 +0100
Received: (from rwd@localhost) by talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA15726; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 14:18:32 +0100 (BST)
From: Richard Dobson 
Message-Id: <199710071318.OAA15726@talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: pvoc on Mac
To: Richard Karpen 
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 14:18:31 +0100 (BST)
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
In-Reply-To:  from "Richard Karpen" at Oct 5, 97 05:40:24 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

> 
> 
> Has anyone noticed problems with pvoc on the Mac? I have tried both the
> "Mills"  release and my own copy of version 3.46 code that I compiled on
> the Mac and not having good results with the resynthesis.
> 
> I took the analysis that I did using the Mills release on the Mac and ran
> the same orch and score and .pvoc file on my SGI and got good results, so
> I'm assuming that if there's a problem it could be with the pvoc ugen code
> and not the pvanal code. The resulting resynthesis on the Mac has
> extraneous high frequency components and is somewhat garbled. 
> 
> If anyone else has notice this, I'd be interested in knowing that. If not,
> I'll try a few more tests to make sure I'm not imagining things!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Richard Karpen
> 

Just a guess: because some of Trevor Wisharts more esoteric manglings of
pvoc analysis data can be made to produce similar effects:
Could it have anything to do with the implementation of floating-point
on the MAC, or on the compiler used to build csound?

Richard Dobson




Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa04798;
          7 Oct 97 15:11 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa00759;
          7 Oct 97 15:11 BST
Received: (qmail 24265 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1997 14:11:17 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 7 Oct 1997 14:11:17 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (PAA05909); Tue, 7 Oct 1997 15:00:27 +0100
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Tue, 7 Oct 97 14:59:47 +0100
Received: from root@jason02.u.washington.edu [140.142.76.8] by hermes via ESMTP (OAA09815); Tue, 7 Oct 1997 14:39:55 +0100
Received: from saul1.u.washington.edu (karpen@saul1.u.washington.edu [140.142.82.10])
          by jason02.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id GAA38474; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 06:41:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (karpen@localhost)
          by saul1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with SMTP
	  id GAA19658; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Karpen 
To: Richard Dobson 
Cc: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: pvoc on Mac
In-Reply-To: <199710071318.OAA15726@talisker.pact.srf.ac.uk>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


In the new version from Mills, based on 3.47, pvoc now works. I'm assuming
too that there was a floating point/compilation type of problem before,
but that's just a guess. 


On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Richard Dobson wrote:

> > 
> > 
> > Has anyone noticed problems with pvoc on the Mac? I have tried both the
> > "Mills"  release and my own copy of version 3.46 code that I compiled on
> > the Mac and not having good results with the resynthesis.
> > 
> > I took the analysis that I did using the Mills release on the Mac and ran
> > the same orch and score and .pvoc file on my SGI and got good results, so
> > I'm assuming that if there's a problem it could be with the pvoc ugen code
> > and not the pvanal code. The resulting resynthesis on the Mac has
> > extraneous high frequency components and is somewhat garbled. 
> > 
> > If anyone else has notice this, I'd be interested in knowing that. If not,
> > I'll try a few more tests to make sure I'm not imagining things!
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Richard Karpen
> > 
> 
> Just a guess: because some of Trevor Wisharts more esoteric manglings of
> pvoc analysis data can be made to produce similar effects:
> Could it have anything to do with the implementation of floating-point
> on the MAC, or on the compiler used to build csound?
> 
> Richard Dobson
> 
> 




Received: from stork.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa07914;
          8 Oct 97 11:19 BST
Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk by stork.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa24907;
          8 Oct 97 11:19 BST
Received: (qmail 7947 invoked from network); 8 Oct 1997 10:19:05 -0000
Received: from hermes.ex.ac.uk (144.173.6.14)
  by pat.bath.ac.uk with SMTP; 8 Oct 1997 10:19:05 -0000
Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (LAA12586); Wed, 8 Oct 1997 11:10:13 +0100
Received: from exub by maths.exeter.ac.uk; Wed, 8 Oct 97 06:45:15 +0100
Received: from sun1.fabaris.it [194.91.204.1] by exub via ESMTP (GAA26131); Wed, 8 Oct 1997 06:46:37 +0100
Received: from sun1.fabaris.it.fabaris.it by fabaris.it (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id HAA07500; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 07:36:56 +0200
Message-Id: <343B2BD6.7768@fabaris.it>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 07:44:38 +0100
From: Riccardo Bianchini 
Reply-To: rb@fabaris.it
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: csound@maths.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: unfamiliar csound score format
References: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk

Arne Hanna wrote:
> 
> Having downloaded the csound dx7 files from
> http://www.parnasse.com/dx72csnd.shtml, I'm puzzled about this from the
> XyloHrdwd score file:
> 
> i01  0 .19 6.00 97 0 0 0 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 2 12000 3 8 4 6 10 9 11 3
> ; Algorithm = 9
> ; Patch name is XyloHrdWd\
> i 1.1   1.00   .54  6.07    87
> ...
> The first score line has 25 pfields, but thereafter only 5.  Is this
> something to do with ihold in the dx731.orc file? And why i01 ?
> 
1. The lines from 2nd on simply repeat p.fields from 6 to 25 unchanged
(carry feature without a <.>)
2.  and  are exactly the same to Csound. Nothing to do with
.

Happy Csounding!

Riccardo

*****************************************************
* Riccardo Bianchini, Professor of Electronic Music *
*****************************************************
* Conservatorio "S.Cecilia", Rome, Italy            *
*****************************************************