score s statement
Date | 2017-06-17 21:47 |
From | luis jure |
Subject | score s statement |
i'm confused by the behaviour of the s statement in the score. the manual page states: "The first p-field time is optional and if present determines the end time (length in beats) of the section. This time must be after the end of the last event in the section otherwise it will have no effect." that was true until 6.08, but as far as i can see, in 6.09 the time duration in p1 will be *added after* the end of the last note in the section. thus, with this code: i1 0 1 s2 i get a section with a duration of two seconds in 6.08, and of *three* seconds in 6.09. i agree that this behaviour could be more intuitive and more convenient than the previous one, but in that case the manual page should be amended. unless it's a bug or i failed to understand something. -- Csound mailing list Csound@listserv.heanet.ie https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND Send bugs reports to https://github.com/csound/csound/issues Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
Date | 2017-06-19 14:38 |
From | luis jure |
Subject | Re: follow-up: e statement |
i found another inconsistency in 6.09: the p1 value of the e event is ignored altogether. Csound mailing list Csound@listserv.heanet.ie https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND Send bugs reports to https://github.com/csound/csound/issues Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
Date | 2017-06-19 14:45 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: follow-up: e statement |
P1 is ignored, P2 is action time. It’s been discussed and settled like this, as far as I know. ======================== Prof. Victor Lazzarini Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland Tel: 00 353 7086936 Fax: 00 353 1 7086952 > On 19 Jun 2017, at 14:38, luis jure |
Date | 2017-06-19 16:25 |
From | luis jure |
Subject | Re: follow-up: e statement |
el 2017-06-19 a las 13:45 Victor Lazzarini escribió: > P1 is ignored, P2 is action time. yes, i know, and i tried both ways (e x and e 0 x). none of them work for me with 6.09 (release). but never mind, i don't have this problem with a build from recent git. also the problem with the duration of the section is gone. thanks, and sorry for the noise. Csound mailing list Csound@listserv.heanet.ie https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND Send bugs reports to https://github.com/csound/csound/issues Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
Date | 2017-06-19 16:27 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: follow-up: e statement |
Thanks, the two were probably related. As soon as we have the build for linux corrected, we will be preparing a bugfix release. ======================== Prof. Victor Lazzarini Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland Tel: 00 353 7086936 Fax: 00 353 1 7086952 > On 19 Jun 2017, at 16:25, luis jure |