effect of aexite in wgpluck not noticeable
Date | 2017-03-27 10:59 |
From | Richard |
Subject | effect of aexite in wgpluck not noticeable |
I was playing around with wgpluck. I noticed that making aexite 0 still produced sound. I also expected that creating a 'dirty' exitation signal (a combination of noise, ring modulation under an exponential envelope) would produce interesting harmonics, but none of this is happening. Am I wrong about the assumptions of the exite signal? Richard Csound mailing list Csound@listserv.heanet.ie https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND Send bugs reports to https://github.com/csound/csound/issues Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
Date | 2017-03-29 07:38 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | Re: effect of aexite in wgpluck not noticeable |
I would expect the same as you. Did you try maing the amplitude zero? If the manual is correct, the iamp argument sets the amplitude of the initial pluck. If you are using another more free exciter signale, perhaps you need to set the amp to zero to let the waveguide be excited only by the axcite signal ? Partly guessing here, so do forgive if I'm off. Also, do check out Victor's more recent implementations of waveguides with allpass-adjusted delaylines for more precise tuning. IIRC there was a discussion with him and Aaron a while back(?). Those implementations would give you better control of what the exciter signal is, and where you insert it into the loop, and you could roll your own variations quite easily. 2017-03-27 2:59 GMT-07:00 Richard <zappfinger@gmail.com>: I was playing around with wgpluck. I noticed that making aexite 0 still produced sound. Oeyvind Brandtsegg Professor of Music Technology NTNU 7491 Trondheim Norway Cell: +47 92 203 205 http://www.partikkelaudio.com/ http://crossadaptive.hf.ntnu.no http://gdsp.hf.ntnu.no/ http://soundcloud.com/brandtsegg http://flyndresang.no/ http://soundcloud.com/t-emp |
Date | 2017-03-29 09:29 |
From | Richard |
Subject | Re: effect of aexite in wgpluck not noticeable |
You are right, setting iamp to 0 does produce the desired result! Richard On 29/03/17 08:38, Oeyvind Brandtsegg
wrote:
|