algorithmic composition for video
| Date | 2017-01-29 12:40 |
| From | Zohar Argaman |
| Subject | algorithmic composition for video |
csound opened me to algorithmic composition of sound.
Csound mailing list
Csound@listserv.heanet.ie
https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND
Send bugs reports to
https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
what about algorithmic composition of video? is there any programming language for manipulation of frame by frame stream? would something like that work live? Zohar |
| Date | 2017-01-29 12:54 |
| From | Hlöðver Sigurðsson |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
Opengl GLSL Shader language is a world of algorithmic videos. You can even start trying out some algorithms at www.shadertoy.com It works live and I combine GLSL with audio via openframeworks in live-coding performances. 2017-01-29 13:40 GMT+01:00 Zohar Argaman <zoharargaman@gmail.com>:
|
| Date | 2017-01-29 12:56 |
| From | Michael Gogins |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
Yes. There are many. Computer game engines can be used. OpenGL and WebGL can be used. My piece Scrims is an example of using WebGL with Csound, see https://gogins.github.io/csound/Scrims_pnacl.html. Also check out live coding systems like Gibber, and of course the demoscene. Just search for "demoscene" on YouTube or Google. Also Processing and p5.js. Regards, Mike On Jan 29, 2017 7:40 AM, "Zohar Argaman" <zoharargaman@gmail.com> wrote:
|
| Date | 2017-01-29 13:41 |
| From | John DeBlase |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
You should check out MAx/MSP's jitter framework and/or Pure Data's GEM.
|
| Date | 2017-01-29 21:52 |
| From | Luciano Zanatta |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
You could try Processing, also. 2017-01-29 11:41 GMT-02:00 John DeBlase <bsnacks000@gmail.com>:
|
| Date | 2017-01-30 13:43 |
| From | Zohar Argaman |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
that's a lot of options. thank you. i wish an experienced being would advise pros and cons of each On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Luciano Zanatta <lucianozanattaterra@gmail.com> wrote:
|
| Date | 2017-01-30 13:55 |
| From | Rory Walsh |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
I think it depends on your own level of experience with each of the tools mentioned. I would always favour the open source tools such as Processing/p5.js over proprietary stuff like Max. Remember that any video generation software that supports OSC can be used to trigger Csound. Nobody mentioned vvvv. That suports OSC, so hooking it up to Csound shouldn't be an issue. On 30 January 2017 at 13:43, Zohar Argaman <zoharargaman@gmail.com> wrote:
|
| Date | 2017-01-30 13:55 |
| From | Rory Walsh |
| Subject | Re: algorithmic composition for video |
p.s. maybe a good thing to do would be to take a look at the different software and see which one you like the most. Then get back to us and ask about linking it to Csound? On 30 January 2017 at 13:55, Rory Walsh <rorywalsh@ear.ie> wrote:
|