What happened to scanned synthesis?
Date | 2016-03-29 20:51 |
From | Gerard Rodríguez |
Subject | What happened to scanned synthesis? |
While researching physical modeling (concretely the mass-spring model) I happened to come across scanned synthesis, it seems a really interesting synthesis method that for some reason is underdeveloped and forgotten (I think I already read most of the papers and posts about it on the internet ... ). To me one of the things that makes it appealing is the fact that it can generate organically changing timbres (for example if you re-excite the model while vibrating it generates a different sound) and control those in a dynamic way (It seems to me that you could develop some playing techniques to change timbre only by exciting the model in particular ways, like vibrating it really fast in some pattern or something like that) in a way that resembles real instruments but the timbre doesn't necessarily imitate those.Anyways I'm going to give it a try and play with it but please tell me your experiences and opinions about it! Thanks. |
Date | 2016-03-29 21:04 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
imagine... the ability for a single opcode/algorithm (scanned) to re-animate any synthesis technique that is based on tables - scanned FM - scanned Granular - scanned SubTractive - scanned Additive - scanned WaveTable - and on and on... imagine... using the excited masses as controllers - scanned resonBank - scanned reverb - scanned multiTap - and on and on you are correct that scanned has so much potential... it is "all" waiting for you and others to explore and discover in Csound glad that you discovered it Dr.B. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Gerard Rodríguez <binbiniqegabenik@gmail.com> wrote:
_____________________________________________ Dr. Richard Boulanger Professor of Electronic Production and Design Professional Writing and Music Technology Division Berklee College of Music ______________________________________________ President of Boulanger Labs - http://boulangerlabs.com Author & Editor of The Csound Book - http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/csound-book Author & Editor of The Audio Programming Book - http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/audio-programming-book ______________________________________________ about: http://www.boulangerlabs.com/about/richardboulanger/ about: http://www.csounds.com/community/developers/dr-richard-boulanger/ music: http://www.csounds.com/community/developers/dr-richard-boulanger/dr-richard-boulanger-music/ ______________________________________________ email: rboulanger@berklee.edu facebook: https://www.facebook.com/richard.boulanger.58 |
Date | 2016-03-29 21:23 |
From | Tarmo Johannes |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
Attachments | scanned-sandbox.csd |
Hi, what could be useful for you - I did quite a lot of experimentation with various combinations of parameters and compiled a number of "presets" to pull out from scanned synthesis. I attach the file here. If you use CsoundQt, open Live event sheets and you can play around with the presest and different parameters. I like scanned synthesis in the sence that the sound has it own life and it just develops. The sound tends to be quite sharp (lots of harmonics), so it can be very good material for various filters. Definitely go on and let hear, what you will find! Cheers! tarmo On Tuesday 29 March 2016 21:51:48 you wrote: > While researching physical modeling (concretely the mass-spring model) I > happened to come across scanned synthesis, it seems a really interesting > synthesis method that for some reason is underdeveloped and forgotten (I > think I already read most of the papers and posts about it on the internet > ... ). > > To me one of the things that makes it appealing is the fact that it can > generate organically changing timbres (for example if you re-excite the > model while vibrating it generates a different sound) and control those in > a dynamic way (It seems to me that you could develop some playing > techniques to change timbre only by exciting the model in particular ways, > like vibrating it really fast in some pattern or something like that) in a > way that resembles real instruments but the timbre doesn't necessarily > imitate those. > > Is there a reason it's underdeveloped? , maybe it doesn't live up to it's > expectations?, it's hard to predict and control? it's authors seemed very > enthusiastic about it. > > Anyways I'm going to give it a try and play with it but please tell me your > experiences and opinions about it! > > Thanks. > > Csound mailing list > Csound@listserv.heanet.ie > https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND > Send bugs reports to > https://github.com/csound/csound/issues > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here Csound mailing list Csound@listserv.heanet.ie https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND Send bugs reports to https://github.com/csound/csound/issues Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
Date | 2016-03-29 21:30 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
Thanks for sharing this Tarmo. Also, I hope that Steven Yi will share some of his inspiring work with Scanned (many of you know it, but not all) He does a beautiful job of "mellowing" the timbres - and creating some evocative music too! I teach scanned at Berklee every semester and the class starts with Steven's music! Dr.B. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tarmo Johannes <tarmo.johannes@otsakool.edu.ee> wrote: Hi, _____________________________________________ Dr. Richard Boulanger Professor of Electronic Production and Design Professional Writing and Music Technology Division Berklee College of Music ______________________________________________ President of Boulanger Labs - http://boulangerlabs.com Author & Editor of The Csound Book - http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/csound-book Author & Editor of The Audio Programming Book - http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/audio-programming-book ______________________________________________ about: http://www.boulangerlabs.com/about/richardboulanger/ about: http://www.csounds.com/community/developers/dr-richard-boulanger/ music: http://www.csounds.com/community/developers/dr-richard-boulanger/dr-richard-boulanger-music/ ______________________________________________ email: rboulanger@berklee.edu facebook: https://www.facebook.com/richard.boulanger.58 |
Date | 2016-03-29 22:59 |
From | joachim heintz |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
hi tarmo - this should be added to the csoundqt examples! (we already have the circularstring-128 in the source materials of the floss manual examples, so should be possible to link to there.) i got some messages like this: unknown opcode ; illegal RT scoreline: ; ; ; ; ;amp dbFS ;init ;irate ;massed ;centering ;scanning trajectory ;freq but this is probably not very relevant. cheers - joachim On 29/03/16 22:23, Tarmo Johannes wrote: > Hi, > > what could be useful for you - I did quite a lot of experimentation with > various combinations of parameters and compiled a number of "presets" to pull > out from scanned synthesis. I attach the file here. > > If you use CsoundQt, open Live event sheets and you can play around with the > presest and different parameters. > > I like scanned synthesis in the sence that the sound has it own life and it > just develops. The sound tends to be quite sharp (lots of harmonics), so it > can be very good material for various filters. > > Definitely go on and let hear, what you will find! > > Cheers! > tarmo > > On Tuesday 29 March 2016 21:51:48 you wrote: >> While researching physical modeling (concretely the mass-spring model) I >> happened to come across scanned synthesis, it seems a really interesting >> synthesis method that for some reason is underdeveloped and forgotten (I >> think I already read most of the papers and posts about it on the internet >> ... ). >> >> To me one of the things that makes it appealing is the fact that it can >> generate organically changing timbres (for example if you re-excite the >> model while vibrating it generates a different sound) and control those in >> a dynamic way (It seems to me that you could develop some playing >> techniques to change timbre only by exciting the model in particular ways, >> like vibrating it really fast in some pattern or something like that) in a >> way that resembles real instruments but the timbre doesn't necessarily >> imitate those. >> >> Is there a reason it's underdeveloped? , maybe it doesn't live up to it's >> expectations?, it's hard to predict and control? it's authors seemed very >> enthusiastic about it. >> >> Anyways I'm going to give it a try and play with it but please tell me your >> experiences and opinions about it! >> >> Thanks. >> >> Csound mailing list >> Csound@listserv.heanet.ie >> https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND >> Send bugs reports to >> https://github.com/csound/csound/issues >> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > > Csound mailing list > Csound@listserv.heanet.ie > https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND > Send bugs reports to > https://github.com/csound/csound/issues > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > Csound mailing list Csound@listserv.heanet.ie https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND Send bugs reports to https://github.com/csound/csound/issues Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
Date | 2016-03-30 09:33 |
From | Gerard Rodríguez |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
Thanks for sharing Tarmo, it will be very useful. Thanks for mentioning Steven Yi's music, I looked it up on his site, but it seems that only one of his pieces, the various Etudes, uses scanned synthesis (still cool and useful though), I'm looking forward to his response. I wish I could attend your classes Richard, I'm sure they are very interesting. PD: Sorry about all the it's on my original mail, damn auto-correct, it hurts my eyes and I can't fix it 2016-03-29 23:59 GMT+02:00 joachim heintz <jh@joachimheintz.de>: hi tarmo - |
Date | 2016-03-30 11:50 |
From | Peter Burgess |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
Attachments | ScannedSynthExample.csd |
I just started exploring scanned synthesis a couple of days ago too, haven't got very far yet, and I've only tried out scantable so far, but I've got the basis for some pad sounds. I also experimented with using scanned synth to control an f-table for the distort opcode. It's not that exciting yet, but here's the fruits of my labour so far.... On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Gerard Rodríguez |
Date | 2016-03-30 23:05 |
From | Steven Yi |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
Thanks Dr. B for the kind words! I'm now curious to once again spend some time with scanned synthesis. :) Gerard: I think the piece that may be of interest is "On the Sensations of Tone": http://kunstmusik.com/2004/10/18/on-the-sensations-of-tone/ On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Gerard Rodríguez |
Date | 2016-03-31 14:23 |
From | Gerard Rodríguez |
Subject | Re: What happened to scanned synthesis? |
Thanks for sharing Peter. Thanks Steven, I missed that one :P, cool piece. 2016-03-31 0:05 GMT+02:00 Steven Yi <stevenyi@gmail.com>: Thanks Dr. B for the kind words! I'm now curious to once again spend |