if your delay lines have feedback, which I
reckon they have, if they are waveguides, you
need to set kr=sr. Otherwise the minimun delay
is going to be ksmps, not 1. No wonder the timbre
changes.

If you don't want to set a global ksmps=1, put
your waveguides in an UDO, and use setksmps 1


Victor

>
>
> I don't understand why changing control rate and sampling
> rate I've differences in timbre and amplitude values.
> I'm working with an instrument that has white noise
> filtered by a bank of resonant filters and a waveguide
> reverb with a lot of delay lines (with delay opcode
> because I don't need to change the delay at kr). Using kr
> 441 sr 44100 I obtain a sound I like (this is the
> strangest thing!), but with kr equal to sr (44100/44100),
> I have some resonance peaks, a slightly different timbre,
> and greater amplitude values...I don't understand why! I
> DON'T use modulating delay lines! And I don't use any
> krate variables! Why changing kr influences timbre and
> amplitude? Same thing if i try with sr 96000, timbre
> changes (and it's natural because there are more high
> frequencies and a cleaner timbre), but amplitudes are
> about TWICE great!
> Thanks for your help and sorry for this newbie question.
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/Sr,-kr-and-amplitude-tf4664296.html#a13324298
> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to
> csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk