| I suggest you integrate Csound with your host in as open-ended a way as possible. For example, does your company have plans to provide a scripting language for the sequencer itself, as Cakewalk has with CAL (Cakewalk Application Language), or Sibelius' scripting language, or whatever? In that case you can use built-in scripts to receive events from the host, or from OSC, or from SCO files, and so on.
In any event, I think OSC support is good, but wouldn't that come just from Csound orcs themselves?
Regards,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
>From: Dave Seidel
>Sent: May 19, 2006 6:16 PM
>To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
>Subject: Re: [Csnd] commercial sequencer/notation app with csound support
>
>Project sounds great, Matt, probably will be a lot of fun. The best of
>luck with it!
>
>I'd like to put a vote in for microtonal scale support using Scala[1]
>.SCL[2] files. You would make a lot of people happy. :-)
>
>- Dave
>
>[1] http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala/
>[2] http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala/scl_format.html
>
>Matt J. Ingalls wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 May 2006, Michael Gogins wrote:
>>
>>> "i" statements are much more powerful and precise.
>>> But if the host doesn't support more precision than MIDI, you might as
>>> well use MIDI.
>>
>> they currently are MIDI-only -- but as i mentioned i am about to do a
>> major overhaul/rewrite, so things can change.
>>
>> i guess it's not that programmatically to send MIDI or note statements,
>> and having finer degree of pitch would be nice [ even to be able to play
>> quarter tones would be something rare -- Sibelius lets you do this, but
>> since it is MIDI pitch bend is used and you can't play chords with
>> quarter tones! ]
>>
>> but i do have a hard time seeing how an instrument with many p-fields
>> working graphically, at that point a text file becomes easier!
>>
>>> > Are you going to embed Csound via the API into the host? >
>>
>> of course!
>>
>> -m
>
>--
>Send bugs reports to this list.
>To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
|