Can the csnd Python module be used on OS X?

If so, it may make sense to take Python out of CsoundVST altogether (actually I am sort of heading in that direction by trying to enable Python in csound5gui). However, that would require moving the Silence classes for algorithmic composition out of CsoundVST and making them a separate module. It's these classes that I mostly use for actually composing!

Regards,
Mike


-----Original Message-----
>From: Victor Lazzarini 
>Sent: May 16, 2006 9:20 AM
>To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
>Subject: Re: [Csnd] [Cs-dev] release date question
>
>It's fine as far as I am concerned. Better fix it really before the release.
>Btw, did you ever consider offering CsoundVST just as a program and
>not as a python module as well (although you would have your python
>intepreter inside it), so that we can have an OSX version?
>
>Victor
>
>At 14:09 16/05/2006, you wrote:
>>Sorry, but I'm experiencing a new problem with CsoundVST. Some scripts run 
>>fine, others produce non-numbers. This didn't used to happen, and it still 
>>doesn't happen when running the script outside CsoundVST (i.e. command 
>>line Python). Not sure whether changes in CsoundVST itself, other other 
>>changes in Csound, are responsible -- and it's hard to debug. So, I'd like 
>>to wait till the end of the month for the release.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mike
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Victor Lazzarini" 
>>
>>To: 
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:58 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Csnd] [Cs-dev] release date question
>>
>>
>>>Thanks. As far as I am concerned, it should be straightforward to
>>>build the releases, so Thurs is fine.
>>>
>>>Victor
>>>At 10:48 16/05/2006, you wrote:
>>>>On Tuesday 16 May 2006 12:26, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Does anyone know the answer?
>>>>
>>>>I already answered this yesterday, but the dev list seems to be very
>>>>unreliable currently, and the message still did not arrive. So, I
>>>>post it again on the main list:
>>>>
>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>On Monday 15 May 2006 18:48, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Should we build the binaries with sources from before or after
>>>> > tagging? I just want to make sure.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, the binaries should be built after the tagging: the
>>>>purpose of tagging the sources is to ensure that all the
>>>>binaries are consistent, in addition to being useful later to
>>>>check out a particular "releaase" version from CVS.
>>>>The currently agreed date for tagging 5.02.0 is 18th (Thursday),
>>>>but this may be changed if requested; tagging earlier means more
>>>>time for building binaries, while tagging later allows for more
>>>>source changes.
>>>>--
>>>>Send bugs reports to this list.
>>>>To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>>>
>>>Victor Lazzarini
>>>Music Technology Laboratory
>>>Music Department
>>>National University of Ireland, Maynooth
>>>--
>>>Send bugs reports to this list.
>>>To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>>
>>
>>--
>>Send bugs reports to this list.
>>To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>
>Victor Lazzarini
>Music Technology Laboratory
>Music Department
>National University of Ireland, Maynooth 
>
>-- 
>Send bugs reports to this list.
>To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk