Hi

I wanted to grap from cvs, and did as usual:

[atte@aarhus current]$ cvs -z9 -d 
:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sf.net:/cvsroot/csound checkout -P csound5 
 

cvs checkout: warning: failed to open /home/atte/.cvspass for reading: 
No such file or directory
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages 
if any)

What am I doing wrong?

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quartet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
http://www.atte.dk/gps  | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

Istvan Varga wrote:

> The public CVS access has been very unreliable since the recent SourceForge
> problems; it also seems the web based CVS interface has not been updated
> since then. If the SourceForge CVS problems are not fixed until then, you
> may have to wait until the 5.02 release.

I'm not in a hurry, but just wanted to try out the new compress opcode 
that John mentioned.

 > but I can also post a tarball
> created from the latest developer CVS sources privately.

That would be great!

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quartet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
http://www.atte.dk/gps  | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

One of the most reported benefits of Csound5 is supposedly the idea 
that we can compile any external opcode and it will work with Csound's 
API provided that the new opcodes do not attempt to access structures 
in the API that are not implemented (mixing major version increments).

This seems like a prime opportunity to demonstrate just how powerful 
the Csound5 API can be by compiling compress.c and linking with a 
previously built Csound5.

I have put the files

compress.c -> Source code
SConstruct -> Current SConstruct target
compress.xml -> Manual entry

in this file

http://www.csounds.com/akbari/compress.tgz

How would it be possible to extrapolate the correct gcc commandline 
flags given this information ?


-David

On Apr 22, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Atte André Jensen wrote:

> Istvan Varga wrote:
>
>> The public CVS access has been very unreliable since the recent 
>> SourceForge
>> problems; it also seems the web based CVS interface has not been 
>> updated
>> since then. If the SourceForge CVS problems are not fixed until then, 
>> you
>> may have to wait until the 5.02 release.
>
> I'm not in a hurry, but just wanted to try out the new compress opcode 
> that John mentioned.
>
> > but I can also post a tarball
>> created from the latest developer CVS sources privately.
>
> That would be great!

Istvan Varga wrote:

> So, should I send it (about 2 MB) ?

Yeah, that would ne swell. Please use atte AT ballbreaker DOT dk...

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quartet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
http://www.atte.dk/gps  | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

Istvan Varga wrote:

> Or not. I have already tried to send it twice, but it was rejected in both
> cases. First I sent a .tar.bz2 package which was assumed to be some sort
> of malware; then, as suggested by the failure notice, I posted a "password-
> protected or scrambled container or archive" in .zip format, but this was
> rejected, too. So, sending the full sources to this address does not seem
> to work.

Sorry about that. Unfortunately I have no control over what mail server. 
Let's wait a bit, shall we? Hopefully I'll be able to update from cvs 
one of these days...

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quartet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
http://www.atte.dk/gps  | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

Seconded!


-David

On Apr 22, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Atte André Jensen wrote:

> Hopefully I'll be able to update from cvs one of these days...