It would be interesting to see shoot-outs between
csound, PD, supercollider, chuck, rtcmix, etc.. If anyone
have some spare time...

>
> > In the battle of so-called 'elegance' and
> > sound-production, I will always look for the latter. But
> > then again that's the way I was schooled and don't
> expect anyone to feel that way (and that's why I use
> csound...)
>
> And there is also efficiency. Csounds inflexibility is
> part and parcel of it's close to the machine architecture,
> which means that if you don't mind coding all your options
> ahead of performance ( as one would normally do building a
> synth in hardware for example ) the performance increase
> is significant. Glyn and I did a PD/csound shoot out a
> couple of years ago for a few tasks and it wasn't even
> close.
>
> Iain
> --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to
> csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk