Yes, I will - today or tomorrow, and report back.

Art Hunkins

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gogins" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Realtime Csound5


> Could you please re-run your test, rendering both times to soundfile, and
measure the times taken? This will give a more precise idea of the speedup
of csound32.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Victor Lazzarini 
> >Sent: Mar 1, 2006 5:38 AM
> >To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> >Subject: Re: [Csnd] Realtime Csound5
> >
> >Thanks for the report (I always use the floats version anyway, never
bothered
> >with the doubles... even for 'tape' pieces. But it's good to know).
> >
> >Victor
> >
> >At 03:54 01/03/2006, you wrote:
> >>I've been comparing csound.exe and csound32.exe with respect to realtime
> >>performance. (Csound.exe is the 64-bit, "higher precision" version.)
> >>
> >>I can report that csound32.exe has a small but significant advantage as
to
> >>what it can handle without breakup compared with csound.exe. I'm
currently
> >>working on a .csd which runs fine at 44100SR with csound32.exe, but
breaks
> >>up with csound.exe. (I imagine the difference is comparable to the
> >>difference in render times for the two versions.)
> >>
> >>That being the case, I'd recommend csound32.exe for all realtime use (on
> >>Windows anyway). This means you need to install from the .zip
distribution
> >>(Varga) rather than the Gogins installer .exe, as the Gogins distro only
> >>contains csound.exe - not csound32.exe.
> >>
> >>Art Hunkins
> >>
> >>--
> >>Send bugs reports to this list.
> >>To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
> >
> >Victor Lazzarini
> >Music Technology Laboratory
> >Music Department
> >National University of Ireland, Maynooth
> >
> >--
> >Send bugs reports to this list.
> >To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>
>
>
> --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk