Re: Ambisonics in Csound5
| Date | 2005-10-24 03:22 |
| From | "Kanata Motohashi" |
| Subject | Re: Ambisonics in Csound5 |
I feel a little too long. What about: bformenc bformdec as oscili and so on. Kanata http://www.soundclick.com/standalonerecords > bformatencode > bformatdecode |
| Date | 2005-10-24 04:47 |
| From | Steven Yi |
| Subject | Re: Ambisonics in Csound5 |
| Attachments | None |
| Date | 2005-10-24 09:56 |
| From | Richard Dobson |
| Subject | Re: Ambisonics in Csound5 |
or bfencode bfdecode In any case we are safer not calling them "~ambi", as my understanding is that strtictly speaking the name "Ambisonics" is still a registered trademark. Richard Dobson Steven Yi wrote: > The shorter names seem fine to me. I would prefer bformatenc and > bformatedec as they are a little clearer to me, but would not object > at all to the shorter names. > > steven |