| yep. That's an easy thing to implement and I'm surprised
we missed it. Would you do it or should I?
Victor
>
> Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the best thing would be to add a possibility to
> > use a function table and so, GEN20.
>
> Do you mean the iwintype parameter of pvsanal ? As it
> already uses 0 for Hamming, 1 for Hanning, and now
> apparently 2 for Kaiser, we could use negative values for
> selecting tables that are expected to be generated with
> GEN20. --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to
> csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk |