Re: What is wrong with butterhp?
Date | 2005-10-17 19:02 |
From | Jan Jacob Hofmann |
Subject | Re: What is wrong with butterhp? |
Thanks a lot for the responses! I tried my test.orc on Anthony's double-precision Csound 4.23: No noise!!! the sound fades smooth and clear. After that, I rendered with single precision...the noise was there again. Ma++'s Version: Noise using butterhp, 32 bit perf (sr 48 khz) 4.23f12(Antony's Version): Noise using butterhp if used with 32 bit perf (sr 44,1 khz) 4.23f12(Antony's Version): Clear sound using butterhp if used with 64 bit perf (sr 44,1 khz) On Win-Versions of Csound there has always been reported clear sound, so far. Are there any ideas what the origin of the noise could be? All the best Jan Jacob sound | movement | object | space sonic architecture | site: http://www.sonicarchitecture.de spatial electronic composition | 2nd order ambisonic music |
Date | 2005-10-17 19:37 |
From | Anthony Kozar |
Subject | Re: What is wrong with butterhp? |
I'm glad that the Mills Perf64 worked for you! Different CPUs can give different results for floating-point operations. Perhaps this is a difference between PowerPC and Pentium architectures. Although, it may still be a bug in the butterhp code that only shows up on PPC for some reason. *shrug* Anthony Jan Jacob Hofmann wrote on 10/17/05 2:02 PM: > Thanks a lot for the responses! > I tried my test.orc on Anthony's double-precision Csound 4.23: No > noise!!! the sound fades smooth and clear. > On Win-Versions of Csound there has always been reported clear sound, > so far. > > Are there any ideas what the origin of the noise could be? |