Re: ++SPAM++ Re: [Csnd] varga csound5 python opcodes
Date | 2005-10-13 17:56 |
From | John ffitch |
Subject | Re: ++SPAM++ Re: [Csnd] varga csound5 python opcodes |
I committed my first attempt at a binary installer earlier today. Should work easily on Linux, and with a small change on OSX. Windows,...well tht will need a little more work. == |
Date | 2005-10-13 18:03 |
From | "Art Hunkins" |
Subject | Re: ++SPAM++ Re: [Csnd] varga csound5 python opcodes |
Amen! Let's hear it for installers too. Art Hunkins > As a musician I can say that the build process seems daunting enough as > it is to many of my colleagues and certainly there is not enough time > available in a day to try and hunt down and figure out why certain > things don't build with a given compiler or without certain > dependencies. > > I don't think a user should ever have to mess with these things just to > make music with Csound. > > > -David |
Date | 2005-10-13 18:05 |
From | Istvan Varga |
Subject | Re: ++SPAM++ Re: [Csnd] varga csound5 python opcodes |
John ffitch wrote: > I committed my first attempt at a binary installer earlier today. Should > work easily on Linux, and with a small change on OSX. Windows,...well tht > will need a little more work. There is already a GUI installer for Windows by Michael Gogins, but it seems to be written specifically for the CsoundVST releases on SourceForge. However, it should be possible to make use of it with some changes. |
Date | 2005-10-13 18:15 |
From | Istvan Varga |
Subject | Re: ++SPAM++ Re: [Csnd] varga csound5 python opcodes |
John ffitch wrote: > I committed my first attempt at a binary installer earlier today. Should > work easily on Linux Would it make sense to have rpm and deb packages for Linux ? Writing a binary installer in C from scratch seems like a lot of work, especially if it takes into account all the possible options, and handles any errors safely. |