[Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API (was: Score Alignment Utility)
Date | 2009-07-02 22:37 |
From | "Art Hunkins" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API (was: Score Alignment Utility) |
Mike and Rick, The *only* problems I've run into with the 5.10 float installer are the ones I detailed in a recent email. I'm not sure why Mike can't reproduce these; perhaps he hasn't tested the float version in real time (from the command line)and tried to exit with CTRL-C? Regarding other non-Python-version-related issues: one possible simplification for newbees would be a variation on the Super-Compact Csound distro I proposed in a recent mail: a single zip, expanded to a single directory - perhaps on a USB drive - running from that directory only. If a frontend were desired, unzip to the same directory. (Or perhaps the frontend and the Super-Compact Csound could even be in the same zip?) No environment variables; no installer; different versions of Csound can coexist without problems. My two cents. Art Hunkins ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gogins" |
Date | 2009-07-02 23:25 |
From | Stéphane Rollandin |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
> No environment variables; no installer; different versions of Csound can > coexist without problems. We have been asking for this for ages... Stef |
Date | 2009-07-02 23:55 |
From | francibal |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Dear all, I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work with a pc windows (xp-vista), and i never had problems. I have installed many different versions, and both float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, but always it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a great help from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be really a pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more experienced users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. Only for report, from a lovers of csound, ciao, and thanks for all, fran. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Date | 2009-07-03 00:10 |
From | DavidW |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Fran, I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that suits you. And that you enjoy using it. Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think it is best not to confuse them. D On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: > > Dear all, > I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work > with a pc > windows (xp-vista), > and i never had problems. I have installed many different versions, > and both > float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, but > always > it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. > Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a > great help > from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be > really a > pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs > (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more > experienced > users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. > > Only for report, from a lovers of csound, > > ciao, and thanks for all, > > fran. > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" ________________________________________________ David Worrall. - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au |
Date | 2009-07-03 02:18 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
asking for this, begging for this - and loosing Csounders all over the world - for ages. sad. so... incredibly sad... particularly given the fact that for those of us who survive the installation and hang in there - it's a pretty incredible tool - uugh....... -dB On Jul 2, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Stéphane Rollandin wrote: >> No environment variables; no installer; different versions of >> Csound can coexist without problems. > > We have been asking for this for ages... > > Stef > > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-03 02:21 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
And it is interesting to note that Fran (welcome by the way - happy to have you on this adventure) does not use a front-end really. -dB On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: > Fran, > I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that > suits you. And that you enjoy using it. > Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. > > Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think > it is best not to confuse them. > > D > On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: > >> >> Dear all, >> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work >> with a pc >> windows (xp-vista), >> and i never had problems. I have installed many different versions, >> and both >> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, but >> always >> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a >> great help >> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be >> really a >> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >> experienced >> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >> >> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >> >> ciao, and thanks for all, >> >> fran. >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > ________________________________________________ > David Worrall. > - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au > - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au > - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au > > > > > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-03 04:48 |
From | Panos Katergiathis |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound |
Friends, i would like to re-suggest that Csound (for PC, Mac, Linux... whatever) should be built and packaged as a portable, no-installer-used application. Anything else is (and will be) causing problems, forever. I first suggested this approach, two or three years ago, on a thread i opened right here, mostly influenced by the fact that Blue is being distributed this way and also by the very positive effect that this site (http://www.portableapps.com) had on my PC life. I thought "wow, that's exactly what Csound, should be: a "portableapp" as well". Panos Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > And it is interesting to note that Fran (welcome by the way - happy to > have you on this adventure) > does not use a front-end really. > > -dB > > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: > >> Fran, >> I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that suits >> you. And that you enjoy using it. >> Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. >> >> Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think it >> is best not to confuse them. >> >> D >> On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work >>> with a pc >>> windows (xp-vista), >>> and i never had problems. I have installed many different versions, >>> and both >>> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, but >>> always >>> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >>> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a >>> great help >>> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be >>> really a >>> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >>> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >>> experienced >>> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >>> >>> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >>> >>> ciao, and thanks for all, >>> >>> fran. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >> ________________________________________________ >> David Worrall. >> - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au >> - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au >> - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe > csound" > |
Date | 2009-07-04 09:24 |
From | Mark Van Peteghem |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound |
I don't feel too comfortable about PortableApps. It is recommended to install applications with administrator rights in a folder that is write-protected, and use them from then on with a user account that can't write in that directory. This prevents viruses and other malware from changing the executables. PortableApps throws this security mechanism out of the window. So I prefer that CSound doesn't become portable app. Blue is not a portable app (at least not in that sense), because it puts data that can be modified by the user (like the instrument library) in the home directory of the user, while the executable is in the applications folder. And I always install Blue using its installer (don't know if it is possible without). But it is a lot easier to install than CSound (although installing CSound was easy - at least in my case). Mark Panos Katergiathis wrote: > I first suggested this approach, two or three years ago, on a thread i > opened right here, mostly influenced by the fact that Blue is being > distributed this way and also by the very positive effect that this > site (http://www.portableapps.com) had on my PC life. I thought "wow, > that's exactly what Csound, should be: a "portableapp" as well". |
Date | 2009-07-06 05:07 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
OK. On a clean XP machine, I tried to be a new user and get the latest version of Csound running. So... like a pro who doesn't know, but hears it's the bomb.... After an hour of trial and error, and hunt and hope, i finally got it running! (with QuteCsound as the frontEnd) No way would a beginner (or worse - a seasoned pro - put up with this) Here's what happens Go to cSounds.com to find *almost everything Csound* First thing in the news is QuteCsound. ? what's that ? Not sure I want something that's Cute? I want to make some serious BEATS!!!! MAN.... But OK... maybe they call Csound Cute Csound now.... Go to download Hummmm... there are 2 versions Double and Float??? Hummmm - I use Logic Pro and Ableton Live and Audacity - and they have never asked me about double or float. OK - I will download both I will install one - doesn't work - not too cute I install the other - oesn't work - not cute at ALL... But wait... Back to cSounds.com... Oh.. there's a download tab/link,,, Ah.. here I find Canonical Csound5 - ALL PLATFORMS - cool, but what does canonical mean? build in echo? No commercial software uses this term - and I have EVERY commercial program on my PC! (i even paid for 1 of them) Csound Page at Sourceforge - what? what's sourceforge.. OK... I go.... Download the latest Csound5.10 for Windows (a binary? what's that? I never got the Reason 4.0 *binary* Worse... again 4 versions 5.9, 5,10 f, d, huh? - but which version float or double? Install Now here's where the fun begins (and beginners GIVE UP) (if they haven't already) - Dialog appears... you don't have Python ? What? I want Csound? but it says.... you can keep installing... great. Keep installing then... what do I click on to run Csound - why not try csound.... NOPE... doesn't run without Python... Then why the @!!@$#@%$#@!# did you let me install it if it won't run without python? Maybe it does... Now to find Python? And this is not easy... there are dozens of versions of Python... I downloaded 6 or 7 Finally, one installed... (time is passing... no C sound .... no sound.... OK. Python is installed - not even sure what version - just whatever one would install... OK... Then... install Csound again. Hum??? Should I uninstall first to be on the safe side? Did I install 2 versions or one over the other? OK.... install Csound float YEAH... no dialog box complaining about Python... (maybe I got it) (((( Has it almost taken you 1 hour to read this email yet))))) - because I do know how cool Csound is.... I do know it's worth it.... but.... I am about ready to give up... Why? Welll ... in the csound folder is csound, winsound, csound5gui, blah blah blh.. - which door to I chose? I chose Csound... makes sense,,, I am installing Csound... terminal appears.... some text wizzes by.... terminal disappears.! OK... I try winSound.... - it doesn't make any sound? it needs an orc or sco and there are none to be found - and how would a beginner know that he needed them? And forget navigating to a folder - uuuuggggghhhh I can't find the desktop at alll.... OK... so I try csound5gui... oh this is a little better ... looks like a transport here and an editor.... BUT where are the orchestras? So.... NO SOUND..... well... in my mind Csound is the most amazing synth... but not in my speakers! So.... I had heard that QuteSound was the way to work with Csound.... launch the version I installed NOPE... seems I installed the double version of QuteCsound - and (and why has it got the name Csound in it ... if there is NO Csound in it... It's a cute launcher, quteHost... QuteWrapper ???? Just confused.... So, I install another version o QuteCsound - and It launches - AMAZING... but where is the sound???? Oh wait there is a menu - with examples.... - I go to one, I select it... I push on the transport... NOPE - wrong Audio Driver Wrong Hardware Setup.... I choose the right hardware setup I click on the transport................ Sound!!!!!! SOUND!!!!!! (CRAPPY CRAPPPYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPY sound - because this is a PC laptop my brother gave me - (I'm a mac guy you see) AN Expert actually And I am setting it up for him..... he's taking this class at Berklee with the Dr. B. guy.... Well.... How would I know, as a beginner... to get rid of all that chatter and breakup in the audio, I would need to set the -B and -b and check the boxes so that it uses the large number???? I am happy now.... It took ME more than 2 hours.... no lie... ..... It might take you less... and if you are lucky and you choose wisely... (True...I am a bit sleepy.... I have been working 18-20 hours per day on The Audio Programming Book - which I am delivering to MIT Press in 10 days (waiting for the foreword from Max Mathews - and tweeking things here and there........ and it's AMAZING!!!!! - with a lot of Csound in there too! - plus..... MusicV (a working version for all platforms! - a gift from Max Mathews) plus (cmusic - workin version for all platforms! a gift from F. Richard Moore) .... and of course..... And by the way.......... when I get it running.......... Where are the cool sounds! I know where they are - the Csound Catalog, cSounds.com, Csound Book, Csound Journal, etc.... but.... will a beginner know where to go... and what to do.... after ALL this, I am afraid that a PRO - a colleage from Berklee let's say.... blows off his family time on Sunday night - and after 2 hours.... Toot 1 - a sine wave........................ Sorry... EMPTY TRASH UNINSTALL MOVE ON.... -dB a "nightmare to install for beginners" (or PROFESSIONALS especially) version of Csound5 for Windows!! uuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhh On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: > Fran, > I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that > suits you. And that you enjoy using it. > Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. > > Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think > it is best not to confuse them. > > D > On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: > >> >> Dear all, >> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work >> with a pc >> windows (xp-vista), >> and i never had problems. I have installed many different versions, >> and both >> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, but >> always >> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a >> great help >> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be >> really a >> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >> experienced >> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >> >> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >> >> ciao, and thanks for all, >> >> fran. >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > ________________________________________________ > David Worrall. > - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au > - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au > - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au > > > > > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-06 05:41 |
From | Julian Peterson |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Perhaps then, write a step by step tutorial to installing csound on Windows. Problem solved. It's not my intention to be flippant, Dr. B., it's just that your ongoing criticism doesn't really help, and I fear it only serves to alienate those developers that have spent so many hours working on the software pro bono. Here's the reality of the situation: csound is a programming language. It's a great programming language, one we're all devoted to, and one which we all rightfully believe is one of the most powerful ever imagined for music and sound production. We all use it in our work, and all have deep and profound feelings of fondness for it. So no one questions your intentions in pursuing this topic, and certainly there is validity to your point. However: csound will never be easy. Right? I mean, it can't be. Even if I were to show up and install csound for a friend, thereby completely bypassing for them the scenario you detailed in your email, they still wouldn't be able to do jack shit with it without ponying up a lot of time to learn how to use it. More time than is required for most other music software (and certainly all commercial software). And this is how we want it, isn't it? Not because we mean to discourage users, but because we want a flexible and robust tool. And the more flexible a computer language/ program is, the steeper the learning curve. If csound were easier, it would be, well, Reason, or some other prefab tool which, while certainly handy and fun, ain't no csound. So while I understand and am sympathetic to what you are saying, it's a bit misguided to hope that csound can be as simple and easy as a commercial music program. They have different goals, and cater to different audiences. I've often imagined that there exists some curve, similar to a supply and demand curve, for the ease of use of a software program. The analogy would be this: easy of use would be like the demand, and power of the program would be the supply. If there is a tremendous amount of flexibility and power in a program/language, then the ease of use must necessarily be low, and vice versa. Well designed software maximizes the ease of use for a given amount of power. Csound is extremely powerful. And considering this, it's also pretty easy to use. We might find opportunity for small improvements in ease of use, but there is an upward limit as long as we expect csound to remain as flexible and powerful as it is currently. Your lambasting of the developers for not creating a csound capable of one-click-install for any first-year student with a crummy laptop might spring from the very best of intentions, but the effect it's having is one of lambasting the developers (and one in particular) whose enthusiasm for continuing to improve csound cannot be helped by your crude parable. And I'd rather much like to keep them around and keep them focused on where their skills are best served: improving the mechanics of csound. The best way to help the situation is to contribute code, but you might be in the same position I am in of not really having the chops necessary to assist in that capacity. The next best thing would be to contribute documentation, such as a HowTo for installing csound on Windows. I would imagine that for yourself the best thing you can do would be to continue that great work you currently perform: being a fierce advocate for the usage and improvement of csound. Everyone here recognizes and appreciates your work in that respect. But if I may offer a modicum of advice: find a manner of expressing this advocacy that doesn't come across as quite so insulting and demeaning to the developers of that program we both love so dearly. That will best serve your goals and the csound community at large. Yours, Julian Peterson On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > OK. > > On a clean XP machine, I tried to be a new user and get the latest > version of Csound running. > > So... like a pro who doesn't know, but hears it's the bomb.... > > After an hour of trial and error, and hunt and hope, i finally got > it running! (with QuteCsound as the frontEnd) > > No way would a beginner (or worse - a seasoned pro - put up with this) > > Here's what happens > > Go to cSounds.com to find *almost everything Csound* > > First thing in the news is QuteCsound. > ? what's that ? Not sure I want something that's Cute? I want to > make some serious BEATS!!!! MAN.... > But OK... maybe they call Csound Cute Csound now.... > > Go to download > > Hummmm... there are 2 versions Double and Float??? Hummmm > - I use Logic Pro and Ableton Live and Audacity - and they have > never asked me about double or float. > > OK - I will download both > > I will install one - doesn't work - not too cute > I install the other - oesn't work - not cute at ALL... > > But wait... Back to cSounds.com... Oh.. there's a download tab/link,,, > > Ah.. here I find Canonical Csound5 - ALL PLATFORMS > - cool, but what does canonical mean? build in echo? No commercial > software uses this term - and I have EVERY commercial program on my > PC! > (i even paid for 1 of them) > > Csound Page at Sourceforge - what? what's sourceforge.. > > OK... I go.... > > > Download the latest Csound5.10 for Windows (a binary? what's > that? I never got the Reason 4.0 *binary* > > Worse... again 4 versions 5.9, 5,10 f, d, huh? > > - but which version float or double? > Install > > > Now here's where the fun begins (and beginners GIVE UP) (if they > haven't already) > > - Dialog appears... you don't have Python ? What? I want Csound? > but it says.... you can keep installing... > > great. > > Keep installing > > then... what do I click on to run Csound - why not try csound.... > > NOPE... doesn't run without Python... > > Then why the @!!@$#@%$#@!# did you let me install it if it won't > run without python? > > > Maybe it does... > > Now to find Python? > > And this is not easy... there are dozens of versions of Python... I > downloaded 6 or 7 > Finally, one installed... (time is passing... no C sound .... no > sound.... > > OK. > > Python is installed - not even sure what version - just whatever one > would install... > > OK... > > Then... install Csound again. > > Hum??? Should I uninstall first to be on the safe side? > Did I install 2 versions or one over the other? > > OK.... > > install Csound float > > YEAH... no dialog box complaining about Python... (maybe I got it) > > (((( Has it almost taken you 1 hour to read this email yet))))) - > because I do know how cool Csound is.... I do know it's worth it.... > but.... > I am about ready to give up... > > Why? > > Welll ... in the csound folder is csound, winsound, csound5gui, blah > blah blh.. - which door to I chose? > > I chose Csound... makes sense,,, I am installing Csound... > > terminal appears.... some text wizzes by.... terminal disappears.! > > OK... I try winSound.... > > - it doesn't make any sound? it needs an orc or sco and there are > none to be found - and how would a beginner know that he needed them? > > And forget navigating to a folder - uuuuggggghhhh I can't find the > desktop at alll.... > > OK... so I try csound5gui... oh this is a little better ... looks > like a transport here and an editor.... > > BUT where are the orchestras? > > So.... NO SOUND..... well... in my mind Csound is the most amazing > synth... but not in my speakers! > > So.... I had heard that QuteSound was the way to work with Csound.... > > launch the version I installed > > NOPE... seems I installed the double version of QuteCsound - and > (and why has it got the name Csound in it ... if there is NO Csound > in it... > It's a cute launcher, quteHost... QuteWrapper ???? > > Just confused.... > > So, I install another version o QuteCsound - and > > It launches - AMAZING... > > but where is the sound???? > > Oh wait there is a menu - with examples.... - I go to one, I select > it... I push on the transport... > > NOPE - wrong Audio Driver Wrong Hardware Setup.... > > I choose the right hardware setup > > I click on the transport................ > > > Sound!!!!!! SOUND!!!!!! (CRAPPY CRAPPPYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPY sound - > because this is a PC laptop my brother gave me - (I'm a mac guy you > see) > AN Expert actually > > And I am setting it up for him..... he's taking this class at > Berklee with the Dr. B. guy.... > > Well.... How would I know, as a beginner... to get rid of all that > chatter and breakup in the audio, I would need to set the -B and -b > and check the boxes so that > it uses the large number???? > > > I am happy now.... It took ME more than 2 hours.... no lie... ..... > > It might take you less... and if you are lucky and you choose > wisely... > (True...I am a bit sleepy.... I have been working 18-20 hours per > day on The Audio Programming Book - which I am delivering to MIT > Press in 10 days (waiting for the foreword from Max Mathews - and > tweeking things here and there........ and it's AMAZING!!!!! - > with a lot of Csound in there too! - plus..... MusicV (a working > version for all platforms! - a gift from Max Mathews) > plus (cmusic - workin version for all platforms! a gift from F. > Richard Moore) .... and of course..... > > And by the way.......... when I get it running.......... Where are > the cool sounds! > > I know where they are - the Csound Catalog, cSounds.com, Csound > Book, Csound Journal, etc.... but.... will a beginner know where to > go... and what to do.... > > after ALL this, I am afraid that a PRO - a colleage from Berklee > let's say.... blows off his family time on Sunday night - and after > 2 hours.... > Toot 1 - a sine wave........................ > > Sorry... > > EMPTY TRASH > > UNINSTALL > > MOVE ON.... > > -dB > > a "nightmare to install for beginners" (or PROFESSIONALS especially) > version of Csound5 for Windows!! uuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhh > > > > > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: > >> Fran, >> I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that >> suits you. And that you enjoy using it. >> Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. >> >> Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think >> it is best not to confuse them. >> >> D >> On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work >>> with a pc >>> windows (xp-vista), >>> and i never had problems. I have installed many different >>> versions, and both >>> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, >>> but always >>> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >>> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a >>> great help >>> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be >>> really a >>> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >>> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >>> experienced >>> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >>> >>> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >>> >>> ciao, and thanks for all, >>> >>> fran. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >> ________________________________________________ >> David Worrall. >> - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au >> - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au >> - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-06 06:13 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Not being critical at all Julian.... I am close with all the developers... and they know how much I respect and love their work. And also....... For many years now, I have been giving a great deal of support to many many csounders.... I was trying to be a little funny. (but also somewhat serious...) in that... it did take that long... and there was that much trial and error) and... most *professional* music software these days - and a ton of free stuff too - does not involve so much trial and error. Audacity... just installed on the PC. go to audacity. choose the latest windows version... install... Boom... - want to add some extra features to Audacity... a few notes here a link there... boom.... working.... minutes not hours... and what I can do with the app, the minute I open it... a lot more than a sine wave. (and by the way toot1 is my sinewave right? I am being critical of my work too here. Note please that the first place I went was my own cSounds.com - and there one gets quite confused - by all the choices. But NO.... a long step by step is NOT what we need. We just need an installer works, and that has the right stuff there (some good demos, some good toots, some good examples of music (QuteCsound has all this now!) - for the PC at for Sure - and for All platforms really... (and maybe we need to think about a developer's build that has more openness and cutting edge features - also for all platforms - maybe we all build that from CVS even.) Most of what I suggest is there for the Mac (thanks to Victor's work on that one) - yet it's true that students of mine still get snagged there too - but less often. (actually, they get snagged for almost the same reason as the PC - with Cecilia installs, because there are so many versions.) I wanted to share the experience that my students and colleagues bring to me - all the time... and then they usually walk away... There are a lot of ways of using Csound. It continues to get better and better - and... more musical models make it much easier to work with. Cecilia is an amazing example of this....... anyone and everyone can get some serious Csound from that - right. You are preaching to the choir here - about how dedicated some of us might be to Csound. What I am sad about... (honestly sad) is.... the fact that we absolutely continue to make the language better and better - and the manuals, and the tutorials... and we continue to come up with new and incredibly powerful ways to work with the language and make it work.... but... we are in so deep and so happy with our quite advanced personal csoundLabs.... I have always wanted everyone to get Csound... that's what was behind The Csound Book. (and that will be behind The Csound5 Book too! - so there will be chapters on MIDI and working with commercial DAWs, etc.. as well as the API, Python OSC stuff. Sadly, I will offer a Csound workshop to another group of 50 on July 17. I will show them ALL the cool things that commercial musician, film composers, game developers, iPhone developers, and serious composers, are doing with Csound... and I will take them through the process of installing it and getting it going - now on both the mac and the pc.... but... once again... 2 or three will get it to work on their PCs the next day - and there is no next day... I am not doing Csound the next day... so... they are then on their own... and probably... looking elsewhere - because they got elsewhere to work! -dB PS - logic is no simple program. Live is easy and intuitive, but not simple. Max is not easy, but it is logical, seductive, inviting, and addicting and ALL the things that Csound should be! (and is becoming for sure) PPS... for less than $300, anyone can get a pretty incredible laptop - and if they are running windows on it, I hope that they ALL will run/ learn/use Csound, Cecilia, Audacity, etc. - and that they will ALL be easy to install - in inspiring right out of the box! PPPPPPPS.... absolutely was not trying to insult anyone... and if I did... please please please accept my sincere apology...... . Dr. Richard Boulanger - rboulanger@berklee.edu On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Julian Peterson wrote: > Perhaps then, write a step by step tutorial to installing csound on > Windows. Problem solved. > > It's not my intention to be flippant, Dr. B., it's just that your > ongoing criticism doesn't really help, and I fear it only serves to > alienate those developers that have spent so many hours working on > the software pro bono. > > Here's the reality of the situation: csound is a programming > language. It's a great programming language, one we're all devoted > to, and one which we all rightfully believe is one of the most > powerful ever imagined for music and sound production. We all use > it in our work, and all have deep and profound feelings of fondness > for it. So no one questions your intentions in pursuing this topic, > and certainly there is validity to your point. However: > > csound will never be easy. > > Right? I mean, it can't be. Even if I were to show up and install > csound for a friend, thereby completely bypassing for them the > scenario you detailed in your email, they still wouldn't be able to > do jack shit with it without ponying up a lot of time to learn how > to use it. More time than is required for most other music software > (and certainly all commercial software). And this is how we want > it, isn't it? Not because we mean to discourage users, but because > we want a flexible and robust tool. And the more flexible a > computer language/program is, the steeper the learning curve. If > csound were easier, it would be, well, Reason, or some other prefab > tool which, while certainly handy and fun, ain't no csound. > > So while I understand and am sympathetic to what you are saying, > it's a bit misguided to hope that csound can be as simple and easy > as a commercial music program. They have different goals, and cater > to different audiences. > > I've often imagined that there exists some curve, similar to a > supply and demand curve, for the ease of use of a software program. > The analogy would be this: easy of use would be like the demand, > and power of the program would be the supply. If there is a > tremendous amount of flexibility and power in a program/language, > then the ease of use must necessarily be low, and vice versa. Well > designed software maximizes the ease of use for a given amount of > power. Csound is extremely powerful. And considering this, it's > also pretty easy to use. We might find opportunity for small > improvements in ease of use, but there is an upward limit as long as > we expect csound to remain as flexible and powerful as it is > currently. > > Your lambasting of the developers for not creating a csound capable > of one-click-install for any first-year student with a crummy laptop > might spring from the very best of intentions, but the effect it's > having is one of lambasting the developers (and one in particular) > whose enthusiasm for continuing to improve csound cannot be helped > by your crude parable. And I'd rather much like to keep them around > and keep them focused on where their skills are best served: > improving the mechanics of csound. > > The best way to help the situation is to contribute code, but you > might be in the same position I am in of not really having the chops > necessary to assist in that capacity. The next best thing would be > to contribute documentation, such as a HowTo for installing csound > on Windows. I would imagine that for yourself the best thing you > can do would be to continue that great work you currently perform: > being a fierce advocate for the usage and improvement of csound. > Everyone here recognizes and appreciates your work in that respect. > > But if I may offer a modicum of advice: find a manner of expressing > this advocacy that doesn't come across as quite so insulting and > demeaning to the developers of that program we both love so dearly. > That will best serve your goals and the csound community at large. > > Yours, > > Julian Peterson > > > > On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > >> OK. >> >> On a clean XP machine, I tried to be a new user and get the latest >> version of Csound running. >> >> So... like a pro who doesn't know, but hears it's the bomb.... >> >> After an hour of trial and error, and hunt and hope, i finally got >> it running! (with QuteCsound as the frontEnd) >> >> No way would a beginner (or worse - a seasoned pro - put up with >> this) >> >> Here's what happens >> >> Go to cSounds.com to find *almost everything Csound* >> >> First thing in the news is QuteCsound. >> ? what's that ? Not sure I want something that's Cute? I want to >> make some serious BEATS!!!! MAN.... >> But OK... maybe they call Csound Cute Csound now.... >> >> Go to download >> >> Hummmm... there are 2 versions Double and Float??? Hummmm >> - I use Logic Pro and Ableton Live and Audacity - and they have >> never asked me about double or float. >> >> OK - I will download both >> >> I will install one - doesn't work - not too cute >> I install the other - oesn't work - not cute at ALL... >> >> But wait... Back to cSounds.com... Oh.. there's a download tab/ >> link,,, >> >> Ah.. here I find Canonical Csound5 - ALL PLATFORMS >> - cool, but what does canonical mean? build in echo? No commercial >> software uses this term - and I have EVERY commercial program on my >> PC! >> (i even paid for 1 of them) >> >> Csound Page at Sourceforge - what? what's sourceforge.. >> >> OK... I go.... >> >> >> Download the latest Csound5.10 for Windows (a binary? what's >> that? I never got the Reason 4.0 *binary* >> >> Worse... again 4 versions 5.9, 5,10 f, d, huh? >> >> - but which version float or double? >> Install >> >> >> Now here's where the fun begins (and beginners GIVE UP) (if they >> haven't already) >> >> - Dialog appears... you don't have Python ? What? I want Csound? >> but it says.... you can keep installing... >> >> great. >> >> Keep installing >> >> then... what do I click on to run Csound - why not try csound.... >> >> NOPE... doesn't run without Python... >> >> Then why the @!!@$#@%$#@!# did you let me install it if it won't >> run without python? >> >> >> Maybe it does... >> >> Now to find Python? >> >> And this is not easy... there are dozens of versions of Python... >> I downloaded 6 or 7 >> Finally, one installed... (time is passing... no C sound .... no >> sound.... >> >> OK. >> >> Python is installed - not even sure what version - just whatever >> one would install... >> >> OK... >> >> Then... install Csound again. >> >> Hum??? Should I uninstall first to be on the safe side? >> Did I install 2 versions or one over the other? >> >> OK.... >> >> install Csound float >> >> YEAH... no dialog box complaining about Python... (maybe I got it) >> >> (((( Has it almost taken you 1 hour to read this email yet))))) - >> because I do know how cool Csound is.... I do know it's worth >> it.... but.... >> I am about ready to give up... >> >> Why? >> >> Welll ... in the csound folder is csound, winsound, csound5gui, >> blah blah blh.. - which door to I chose? >> >> I chose Csound... makes sense,,, I am installing Csound... >> >> terminal appears.... some text wizzes by.... terminal disappears.! >> >> OK... I try winSound.... >> >> - it doesn't make any sound? it needs an orc or sco and there are >> none to be found - and how would a beginner know that he needed them? >> >> And forget navigating to a folder - uuuuggggghhhh I can't find the >> desktop at alll.... >> >> OK... so I try csound5gui... oh this is a little better ... looks >> like a transport here and an editor.... >> >> BUT where are the orchestras? >> >> So.... NO SOUND..... well... in my mind Csound is the most amazing >> synth... but not in my speakers! >> >> So.... I had heard that QuteSound was the way to work with >> Csound.... >> >> launch the version I installed >> >> NOPE... seems I installed the double version of QuteCsound - and >> (and why has it got the name Csound in it ... if there is NO Csound >> in it... >> It's a cute launcher, quteHost... QuteWrapper ???? >> >> Just confused.... >> >> So, I install another version o QuteCsound - and >> >> It launches - AMAZING... >> >> but where is the sound???? >> >> Oh wait there is a menu - with examples.... - I go to one, I >> select it... I push on the transport... >> >> NOPE - wrong Audio Driver Wrong Hardware Setup.... >> >> I choose the right hardware setup >> >> I click on the transport................ >> >> >> Sound!!!!!! SOUND!!!!!! (CRAPPY CRAPPPYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPY sound - >> because this is a PC laptop my brother gave me - (I'm a mac guy you >> see) >> AN Expert actually >> >> And I am setting it up for him..... he's taking this class at >> Berklee with the Dr. B. guy.... >> >> Well.... How would I know, as a beginner... to get rid of all that >> chatter and breakup in the audio, I would need to set the -B and -b >> and check the boxes so that >> it uses the large number???? >> >> >> I am happy now.... It took ME more than 2 hours.... no lie... ..... >> >> It might take you less... and if you are lucky and you choose >> wisely... >> (True...I am a bit sleepy.... I have been working 18-20 hours per >> day on The Audio Programming Book - which I am delivering to MIT >> Press in 10 days (waiting for the foreword from Max Mathews - and >> tweeking things here and there........ and it's AMAZING!!!!! - >> with a lot of Csound in there too! - plus..... MusicV (a working >> version for all platforms! - a gift from Max Mathews) >> plus (cmusic - workin version for all platforms! a gift from F. >> Richard Moore) .... and of course..... >> >> And by the way.......... when I get it running.......... Where >> are the cool sounds! >> >> I know where they are - the Csound Catalog, cSounds.com, Csound >> Book, Csound Journal, etc.... but.... will a beginner know where to >> go... and what to do.... >> >> after ALL this, I am afraid that a PRO - a colleage from Berklee >> let's say.... blows off his family time on Sunday night - and after >> 2 hours.... >> Toot 1 - a sine wave........................ >> >> Sorry... >> >> EMPTY TRASH >> >> UNINSTALL >> >> MOVE ON.... >> >> -dB >> >> a "nightmare to install for beginners" (or PROFESSIONALS >> especially) version of Csound5 for Windows!! uuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhh >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: >> >>> Fran, >>> I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that >>> suits you. And that you enjoy using it. >>> Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. >>> >>> Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think >>> it is best not to confuse them. >>> >>> D >>> On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i >>>> work with a pc >>>> windows (xp-vista), >>>> and i never had problems. I have installed many different >>>> versions, and both >>>> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, >>>> but always >>>> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >>>> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a >>>> great help >>>> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would >>>> be really a >>>> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >>>> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >>>> experienced >>>> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >>>> >>>> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >>>> >>>> ciao, and thanks for all, >>>> >>>> fran. >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >>>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>>> "unsubscribe csound" >>> >>> ________________________________________________ >>> David Worrall. >>> - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au >>> - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au >>> - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-06 07:09 |
From | Julian Peterson |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Thanks, Dr. B. I understand your position much better from this last email. I'm sorry if I mistook your tone from before. J On Jul 5, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > Not being critical at all Julian.... > I am close with all the developers... and they know how much I > respect and love their work. > And also....... For many years now, I have been giving a great deal > of support to many many csounders.... > > > I was trying to be a little funny. (but also somewhat serious...) > in that... it did take that long... and there was that much trial > and error) > and... most *professional* music software these days - and a ton of > free stuff too - does not involve so much trial and error. > > Audacity... just installed on the PC. go to audacity. choose the > latest windows version... install... Boom... > - want to add some extra features to Audacity... a few notes here a > link there... boom.... working.... minutes not hours... and what I > can do > with the app, the minute I open it... a lot more than a sine wave. > (and by the way toot1 is my sinewave right? I am being critical of > my work too here. > > Note please that the first place I went was my own cSounds.com - and > there one gets quite confused - by all the choices. > > But NO.... a long step by step is NOT what we need. > > We just need an installer works, and that has the right stuff there > (some good demos, some good toots, some good examples of music > (QuteCsound has all this now!) > - for the PC at for Sure - and for All platforms really... (and > maybe we need to think about a developer's build that has more > openness and cutting edge features > - also for all platforms - maybe we all build that from CVS even.) > > Most of what I suggest is there for the Mac (thanks to Victor's work > on that one) - yet it's true that students of mine still get snagged > there too - but less often. > (actually, they get snagged for almost the same reason as the PC - > with Cecilia installs, because there are so many versions.) > > > I wanted to share the experience that my students and colleagues > bring to me - all the time... > and then they usually walk away... > > There are a lot of ways of using Csound. It continues to get better > and better - and... more musical models make it much easier to work > with. > > Cecilia is an amazing example of this....... anyone and everyone > can get some serious Csound from that - right. > > You are preaching to the choir here - about how dedicated some of us > might be to Csound. > > What I am sad about... (honestly sad) is.... the fact that we > absolutely continue to make the language better and better - and the > manuals, and the tutorials... > and we continue to come up with new and incredibly powerful ways to > work with the language and make it work.... but... we are in so deep > and so happy with our quite advanced personal csoundLabs.... I have > always wanted everyone to get Csound... that's what was behind The > Csound Book. > (and that will be behind The Csound5 Book too! - so there will be > chapters on MIDI and working with commercial DAWs, etc.. as well as > the API, Python > OSC stuff. > > Sadly, I will offer a Csound workshop to another group of 50 on July > 17. I will show them ALL the cool things that commercial musician, > film composers, game developers, iPhone developers, and serious > composers, are doing with Csound... and I will take them through the > process of installing it and getting it going - now on both the mac > and the pc.... but... once again... 2 or three will get it to work > on their PCs the next day - and there is no next day... I am not > doing Csound the next day... so... they are > then on their own... and probably... looking elsewhere - because > they got elsewhere to work! > > > -dB > > PS - logic is no simple program. Live is easy and intuitive, but > not simple. Max is not easy, but it is logical, seductive, > inviting, and addicting and ALL the things that Csound should be! > (and is becoming for sure) > > PPS... for less than $300, anyone can get a pretty incredible laptop > - and if they are running windows on it, I hope that they ALL will > run/learn/use Csound, Cecilia, Audacity, etc. - and that they will > ALL be easy to install - in inspiring right out of the box! > > PPPPPPPS.... absolutely was not trying to insult anyone... and if I > did... please please please accept my sincere apology...... > . > Dr. Richard Boulanger - rboulanger@berklee.edu > > > > On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Julian Peterson wrote: > >> Perhaps then, write a step by step tutorial to installing csound on >> Windows. Problem solved. >> >> It's not my intention to be flippant, Dr. B., it's just that your >> ongoing criticism doesn't really help, and I fear it only serves to >> alienate those developers that have spent so many hours working on >> the software pro bono. >> >> Here's the reality of the situation: csound is a programming >> language. It's a great programming language, one we're all devoted >> to, and one which we all rightfully believe is one of the most >> powerful ever imagined for music and sound production. We all use >> it in our work, and all have deep and profound feelings of fondness >> for it. So no one questions your intentions in pursuing this >> topic, and certainly there is validity to your point. However: >> >> csound will never be easy. >> >> Right? I mean, it can't be. Even if I were to show up and install >> csound for a friend, thereby completely bypassing for them the >> scenario you detailed in your email, they still wouldn't be able to >> do jack shit with it without ponying up a lot of time to learn how >> to use it. More time than is required for most other music >> software (and certainly all commercial software). And this is how >> we want it, isn't it? Not because we mean to discourage users, but >> because we want a flexible and robust tool. And the more flexible >> a computer language/program is, the steeper the learning curve. If >> csound were easier, it would be, well, Reason, or some other prefab >> tool which, while certainly handy and fun, ain't no csound. >> >> So while I understand and am sympathetic to what you are saying, >> it's a bit misguided to hope that csound can be as simple and easy >> as a commercial music program. They have different goals, and >> cater to different audiences. >> >> I've often imagined that there exists some curve, similar to a >> supply and demand curve, for the ease of use of a software >> program. The analogy would be this: easy of use would be like the >> demand, and power of the program would be the supply. If there is >> a tremendous amount of flexibility and power in a program/language, >> then the ease of use must necessarily be low, and vice versa. Well >> designed software maximizes the ease of use for a given amount of >> power. Csound is extremely powerful. And considering this, it's >> also pretty easy to use. We might find opportunity for small >> improvements in ease of use, but there is an upward limit as long >> as we expect csound to remain as flexible and powerful as it is >> currently. >> >> Your lambasting of the developers for not creating a csound capable >> of one-click-install for any first-year student with a crummy >> laptop might spring from the very best of intentions, but the >> effect it's having is one of lambasting the developers (and one in >> particular) whose enthusiasm for continuing to improve csound >> cannot be helped by your crude parable. And I'd rather much like >> to keep them around and keep them focused on where their skills are >> best served: improving the mechanics of csound. >> >> The best way to help the situation is to contribute code, but you >> might be in the same position I am in of not really having the >> chops necessary to assist in that capacity. The next best thing >> would be to contribute documentation, such as a HowTo for >> installing csound on Windows. I would imagine that for yourself >> the best thing you can do would be to continue that great work you >> currently perform: being a fierce advocate for the usage and >> improvement of csound. Everyone here recognizes and appreciates >> your work in that respect. >> >> But if I may offer a modicum of advice: find a manner of expressing >> this advocacy that doesn't come across as quite so insulting and >> demeaning to the developers of that program we both love so >> dearly. That will best serve your goals and the csound community >> at large. >> >> Yours, >> >> Julian Peterson >> >> >> >> On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: >> >>> OK. >>> >>> On a clean XP machine, I tried to be a new user and get the latest >>> version of Csound running. >>> >>> So... like a pro who doesn't know, but hears it's the bomb.... >>> >>> After an hour of trial and error, and hunt and hope, i finally got >>> it running! (with QuteCsound as the frontEnd) >>> >>> No way would a beginner (or worse - a seasoned pro - put up with >>> this) >>> >>> Here's what happens >>> >>> Go to cSounds.com to find *almost everything Csound* >>> >>> First thing in the news is QuteCsound. >>> ? what's that ? Not sure I want something that's Cute? I want to >>> make some serious BEATS!!!! MAN.... >>> But OK... maybe they call Csound Cute Csound now.... >>> >>> Go to download >>> >>> Hummmm... there are 2 versions Double and Float??? Hummmm >>> - I use Logic Pro and Ableton Live and Audacity - and they have >>> never asked me about double or float. >>> >>> OK - I will download both >>> >>> I will install one - doesn't work - not too cute >>> I install the other - oesn't work - not cute at ALL... >>> >>> But wait... Back to cSounds.com... Oh.. there's a download tab/ >>> link,,, >>> >>> Ah.. here I find Canonical Csound5 - ALL PLATFORMS >>> - cool, but what does canonical mean? build in echo? No >>> commercial software uses this term - and I have EVERY commercial >>> program on my PC! >>> (i even paid for 1 of them) >>> >>> Csound Page at Sourceforge - what? what's sourceforge.. >>> >>> OK... I go.... >>> >>> >>> Download the latest Csound5.10 for Windows (a binary? what's >>> that? I never got the Reason 4.0 *binary* >>> >>> Worse... again 4 versions 5.9, 5,10 f, d, huh? >>> >>> - but which version float or double? >>> Install >>> >>> >>> Now here's where the fun begins (and beginners GIVE UP) (if they >>> haven't already) >>> >>> - Dialog appears... you don't have Python ? What? I want Csound? >>> but it says.... you can keep installing... >>> >>> great. >>> >>> Keep installing >>> >>> then... what do I click on to run Csound - why not try csound.... >>> >>> NOPE... doesn't run without Python... >>> >>> Then why the @!!@$#@%$#@!# did you let me install it if it won't >>> run without python? >>> >>> >>> Maybe it does... >>> >>> Now to find Python? >>> >>> And this is not easy... there are dozens of versions of Python... >>> I downloaded 6 or 7 >>> Finally, one installed... (time is passing... no C sound .... no >>> sound.... >>> >>> OK. >>> >>> Python is installed - not even sure what version - just whatever >>> one would install... >>> >>> OK... >>> >>> Then... install Csound again. >>> >>> Hum??? Should I uninstall first to be on the safe side? >>> Did I install 2 versions or one over the other? >>> >>> OK.... >>> >>> install Csound float >>> >>> YEAH... no dialog box complaining about Python... (maybe I got it) >>> >>> (((( Has it almost taken you 1 hour to read this email yet))))) - >>> because I do know how cool Csound is.... I do know it's worth >>> it.... but.... >>> I am about ready to give up... >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> Welll ... in the csound folder is csound, winsound, csound5gui, >>> blah blah blh.. - which door to I chose? >>> >>> I chose Csound... makes sense,,, I am installing Csound... >>> >>> terminal appears.... some text wizzes by.... terminal disappears.! >>> >>> OK... I try winSound.... >>> >>> - it doesn't make any sound? it needs an orc or sco and there are >>> none to be found - and how would a beginner know that he needed >>> them? >>> >>> And forget navigating to a folder - uuuuggggghhhh I can't find the >>> desktop at alll.... >>> >>> OK... so I try csound5gui... oh this is a little better ... looks >>> like a transport here and an editor.... >>> >>> BUT where are the orchestras? >>> >>> So.... NO SOUND..... well... in my mind Csound is the most amazing >>> synth... but not in my speakers! >>> >>> So.... I had heard that QuteSound was the way to work with >>> Csound.... >>> >>> launch the version I installed >>> >>> NOPE... seems I installed the double version of QuteCsound - and >>> (and why has it got the name Csound in it ... if there is NO >>> Csound in it... >>> It's a cute launcher, quteHost... QuteWrapper ???? >>> >>> Just confused.... >>> >>> So, I install another version o QuteCsound - and >>> >>> It launches - AMAZING... >>> >>> but where is the sound???? >>> >>> Oh wait there is a menu - with examples.... - I go to one, I >>> select it... I push on the transport... >>> >>> NOPE - wrong Audio Driver Wrong Hardware Setup.... >>> >>> I choose the right hardware setup >>> >>> I click on the transport................ >>> >>> >>> Sound!!!!!! SOUND!!!!!! (CRAPPY CRAPPPYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPY sound - >>> because this is a PC laptop my brother gave me - (I'm a mac guy >>> you see) >>> AN Expert actually >>> >>> And I am setting it up for him..... he's taking this class at >>> Berklee with the Dr. B. guy.... >>> >>> Well.... How would I know, as a beginner... to get rid of all that >>> chatter and breakup in the audio, I would need to set the -B and - >>> b and check the boxes so that >>> it uses the large number???? >>> >>> >>> I am happy now.... It took ME more than 2 hours.... no >>> lie... ..... >>> >>> It might take you less... and if you are lucky and you choose >>> wisely... >>> (True...I am a bit sleepy.... I have been working 18-20 hours per >>> day on The Audio Programming Book - which I am delivering to MIT >>> Press in 10 days (waiting for the foreword from Max Mathews - and >>> tweeking things here and there........ and it's AMAZING!!!!! - >>> with a lot of Csound in there too! - plus..... MusicV (a working >>> version for all platforms! - a gift from Max Mathews) >>> plus (cmusic - workin version for all platforms! a gift from F. >>> Richard Moore) .... and of course..... >>> >>> And by the way.......... when I get it running.......... Where >>> are the cool sounds! >>> >>> I know where they are - the Csound Catalog, cSounds.com, Csound >>> Book, Csound Journal, etc.... but.... will a beginner know where >>> to go... and what to do.... >>> >>> after ALL this, I am afraid that a PRO - a colleage from Berklee >>> let's say.... blows off his family time on Sunday night - and >>> after 2 hours.... >>> Toot 1 - a sine wave........................ >>> >>> Sorry... >>> >>> EMPTY TRASH >>> >>> UNINSTALL >>> >>> MOVE ON.... >>> >>> -dB >>> >>> a "nightmare to install for beginners" (or PROFESSIONALS >>> especially) version of Csound5 for Windows!! uuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhh >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: >>> >>>> Fran, >>>> I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that >>>> suits you. And that you enjoy using it. >>>> Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. >>>> >>>> Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I >>>> think it is best not to confuse them. >>>> >>>> D >>>> On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i >>>>> work with a pc >>>>> windows (xp-vista), >>>>> and i never had problems. I have installed many different >>>>> versions, and both >>>>> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, >>>>> but always >>>>> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >>>>> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with >>>>> a great help >>>>> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would >>>>> be really a >>>>> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >>>>> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >>>>> experienced >>>>> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >>>>> >>>>> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >>>>> >>>>> ciao, and thanks for all, >>>>> >>>>> fran. >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >>>>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>>>> "unsubscribe csound" >>>> >>>> ________________________________________________ >>>> David Worrall. >>>> - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au >>>> - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au >>>> - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>>> "unsubscribe csound" >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-06 09:21 |
From | Mark Van Peteghem |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound |
Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > ... a lot more than a sine wave. (and by the way toot1 is my sinewave > right? I am being critical of my work too here. I actually think it's ideal for a first lesson, because it is really a foundation. A bit like a program that prints "Hello world!", which is the first example in many programming languages - not impressive at all, but good as a first lesson. I think users understand that this is just the begin. But Michael Gogins' tutorial starts by showing how to play an existing example, by letting new users play Xanadu, that sure makes a good first impression. Shortly after that it teaches how to create a sine wave. And it's a great introduction to CSound in all. Unfortunately it took me some time before I found the tutorial by MG after I installed CSound, because I first looked in the doc folder, where there are two huge pdf's that are of no use to a beginner, they make you think CSound is for Einsteins. Then I found the documentation in the folder doc\manual, and as hobby web developer I was lucky to know that you better start with index.html, and then I could finally start learning CSound. The C++ library Boost has a index.html file in the top folder of their distribution, which is simply a redirect to the main page of the documentation, it would be nice to have that. -- Mark _________________________________________ When you get lemons, you make lemonade. When you get hardware, you make software. |
Date | 2009-07-06 11:19 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Julian, I took and take your points to heart too... and very much appreciate them.... I was being a little too *cute* for sure - and I am sorry that i went a bit over the line - to make a point. Surely I offended some - and for that I am sorry. This is an amazing community - of incredibly dedicated volunteers, who, through their 22+ years of generous contributions to this cause, have made a huge difference in the world of computer music - of music. There is no way to sufficiently express the gratitude that I feel. All I can do, as a teacher, a student and a friend, is to share their gift of time and talent with as many as I can - and I do... three semesters a year for the past 23 years - 6 to 12 students a semester. (one starfish at a time.) -drB On Jul 6, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Julian Peterson wrote: > Thanks, Dr. B. I understand your position much better from this > last email. I'm sorry if I mistook your tone from before. > > J > > > > On Jul 5, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > >> Not being critical at all Julian.... >> I am close with all the developers... and they know how much I >> respect and love their work. >> And also....... For many years now, I have been giving a great deal >> of support to many many csounders.... >> >> >> I was trying to be a little funny. (but also somewhat serious...) >> in that... it did take that long... and there was that much trial >> and error) >> and... most *professional* music software these days - and a ton of >> free stuff too - does not involve so much trial and error. >> >> Audacity... just installed on the PC. go to audacity. choose the >> latest windows version... install... Boom... >> - want to add some extra features to Audacity... a few notes here a >> link there... boom.... working.... minutes not hours... and what I >> can do >> with the app, the minute I open it... a lot more than a sine wave. >> (and by the way toot1 is my sinewave right? I am being critical of >> my work too here. >> >> Note please that the first place I went was my own cSounds.com - >> and there one gets quite confused - by all the choices. >> >> But NO.... a long step by step is NOT what we need. >> >> We just need an installer works, and that has the right stuff there >> (some good demos, some good toots, some good examples of music >> (QuteCsound has all this now!) >> - for the PC at for Sure - and for All platforms really... (and >> maybe we need to think about a developer's build that has more >> openness and cutting edge features >> - also for all platforms - maybe we all build that from CVS even.) >> >> Most of what I suggest is there for the Mac (thanks to Victor's >> work on that one) - yet it's true that students of mine still get >> snagged there too - but less often. >> (actually, they get snagged for almost the same reason as the PC - >> with Cecilia installs, because there are so many versions.) >> >> >> I wanted to share the experience that my students and colleagues >> bring to me - all the time... >> and then they usually walk away... >> >> There are a lot of ways of using Csound. It continues to get >> better and better - and... more musical models make it much easier >> to work with. >> >> Cecilia is an amazing example of this....... anyone and everyone >> can get some serious Csound from that - right. >> >> You are preaching to the choir here - about how dedicated some of >> us might be to Csound. >> >> What I am sad about... (honestly sad) is.... the fact that we >> absolutely continue to make the language better and better - and >> the manuals, and the tutorials... >> and we continue to come up with new and incredibly powerful ways to >> work with the language and make it work.... but... we are in so deep >> and so happy with our quite advanced personal csoundLabs.... I >> have always wanted everyone to get Csound... that's what was behind >> The Csound Book. >> (and that will be behind The Csound5 Book too! - so there will be >> chapters on MIDI and working with commercial DAWs, etc.. as well >> as the API, Python >> OSC stuff. >> >> Sadly, I will offer a Csound workshop to another group of 50 on >> July 17. I will show them ALL the cool things that commercial >> musician, film composers, game developers, iPhone developers, and >> serious composers, are doing with Csound... and I will take them >> through the process of installing it and getting it going - now on >> both the mac and the pc.... but... once again... 2 or three will >> get it to work on their PCs the next day - and there is no next >> day... I am not doing Csound the next day... so... they are >> then on their own... and probably... looking elsewhere - because >> they got elsewhere to work! >> >> >> -dB >> >> PS - logic is no simple program. Live is easy and intuitive, but >> not simple. Max is not easy, but it is logical, seductive, >> inviting, and addicting and ALL the things that Csound should be! >> (and is becoming for sure) >> >> PPS... for less than $300, anyone can get a pretty incredible >> laptop - and if they are running windows on it, I hope that they >> ALL will run/learn/use Csound, Cecilia, Audacity, etc. - and that >> they will ALL be easy to install - in inspiring right out of the box! >> >> PPPPPPPS.... absolutely was not trying to insult anyone... and if >> I did... please please please accept my sincere apology...... >> . >> Dr. Richard Boulanger - rboulanger@berklee.edu >> >> >> >> On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Julian Peterson wrote: >> >>> Perhaps then, write a step by step tutorial to installing csound >>> on Windows. Problem solved. >>> >>> It's not my intention to be flippant, Dr. B., it's just that your >>> ongoing criticism doesn't really help, and I fear it only serves >>> to alienate those developers that have spent so many hours working >>> on the software pro bono. >>> >>> Here's the reality of the situation: csound is a programming >>> language. It's a great programming language, one we're all >>> devoted to, and one which we all rightfully believe is one of the >>> most powerful ever imagined for music and sound production. We >>> all use it in our work, and all have deep and profound feelings of >>> fondness for it. So no one questions your intentions in pursuing >>> this topic, and certainly there is validity to your point. However: >>> >>> csound will never be easy. >>> >>> Right? I mean, it can't be. Even if I were to show up and >>> install csound for a friend, thereby completely bypassing for them >>> the scenario you detailed in your email, they still wouldn't be >>> able to do jack shit with it without ponying up a lot of time to >>> learn how to use it. More time than is required for most other >>> music software (and certainly all commercial software). And this >>> is how we want it, isn't it? Not because we mean to discourage >>> users, but because we want a flexible and robust tool. And the >>> more flexible a computer language/program is, the steeper the >>> learning curve. If csound were easier, it would be, well, Reason, >>> or some other prefab tool which, while certainly handy and fun, >>> ain't no csound. >>> >>> So while I understand and am sympathetic to what you are saying, >>> it's a bit misguided to hope that csound can be as simple and easy >>> as a commercial music program. They have different goals, and >>> cater to different audiences. >>> >>> I've often imagined that there exists some curve, similar to a >>> supply and demand curve, for the ease of use of a software >>> program. The analogy would be this: easy of use would be like >>> the demand, and power of the program would be the supply. If >>> there is a tremendous amount of flexibility and power in a program/ >>> language, then the ease of use must necessarily be low, and vice >>> versa. Well designed software maximizes the ease of use for a >>> given amount of power. Csound is extremely powerful. And >>> considering this, it's also pretty easy to use. We might find >>> opportunity for small improvements in ease of use, but there is an >>> upward limit as long as we expect csound to remain as flexible and >>> powerful as it is currently. >>> >>> Your lambasting of the developers for not creating a csound >>> capable of one-click-install for any first-year student with a >>> crummy laptop might spring from the very best of intentions, but >>> the effect it's having is one of lambasting the developers (and >>> one in particular) whose enthusiasm for continuing to improve >>> csound cannot be helped by your crude parable. And I'd rather >>> much like to keep them around and keep them focused on where their >>> skills are best served: improving the mechanics of csound. >>> >>> The best way to help the situation is to contribute code, but you >>> might be in the same position I am in of not really having the >>> chops necessary to assist in that capacity. The next best thing >>> would be to contribute documentation, such as a HowTo for >>> installing csound on Windows. I would imagine that for yourself >>> the best thing you can do would be to continue that great work you >>> currently perform: being a fierce advocate for the usage and >>> improvement of csound. Everyone here recognizes and appreciates >>> your work in that respect. >>> >>> But if I may offer a modicum of advice: find a manner of >>> expressing this advocacy that doesn't come across as quite so >>> insulting and demeaning to the developers of that program we both >>> love so dearly. That will best serve your goals and the csound >>> community at large. >>> >>> Yours, >>> >>> Julian Peterson >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: >>> >>>> OK. >>>> >>>> On a clean XP machine, I tried to be a new user and get the >>>> latest version of Csound running. >>>> >>>> So... like a pro who doesn't know, but hears it's the bomb.... >>>> >>>> After an hour of trial and error, and hunt and hope, i finally >>>> got it running! (with QuteCsound as the frontEnd) >>>> >>>> No way would a beginner (or worse - a seasoned pro - put up with >>>> this) >>>> >>>> Here's what happens >>>> >>>> Go to cSounds.com to find *almost everything Csound* >>>> >>>> First thing in the news is QuteCsound. >>>> ? what's that ? Not sure I want something that's Cute? I want >>>> to make some serious BEATS!!!! MAN.... >>>> But OK... maybe they call Csound Cute Csound now.... >>>> >>>> Go to download >>>> >>>> Hummmm... there are 2 versions Double and Float??? Hummmm >>>> - I use Logic Pro and Ableton Live and Audacity - and they have >>>> never asked me about double or float. >>>> >>>> OK - I will download both >>>> >>>> I will install one - doesn't work - not too cute >>>> I install the other - oesn't work - not cute at ALL... >>>> >>>> But wait... Back to cSounds.com... Oh.. there's a download tab/ >>>> link,,, >>>> >>>> Ah.. here I find Canonical Csound5 - ALL PLATFORMS >>>> - cool, but what does canonical mean? build in echo? No >>>> commercial software uses this term - and I have EVERY commercial >>>> program on my PC! >>>> (i even paid for 1 of them) >>>> >>>> Csound Page at Sourceforge - what? what's sourceforge.. >>>> >>>> OK... I go.... >>>> >>>> >>>> Download the latest Csound5.10 for Windows (a binary? what's >>>> that? I never got the Reason 4.0 *binary* >>>> >>>> Worse... again 4 versions 5.9, 5,10 f, d, huh? >>>> >>>> - but which version float or double? >>>> Install >>>> >>>> >>>> Now here's where the fun begins (and beginners GIVE UP) (if they >>>> haven't already) >>>> >>>> - Dialog appears... you don't have Python ? What? I want Csound? >>>> but it says.... you can keep installing... >>>> >>>> great. >>>> >>>> Keep installing >>>> >>>> then... what do I click on to run Csound - why not try csound.... >>>> >>>> NOPE... doesn't run without Python... >>>> >>>> Then why the @!!@$#@%$#@!# did you let me install it if it won't >>>> run without python? >>>> >>>> >>>> Maybe it does... >>>> >>>> Now to find Python? >>>> >>>> And this is not easy... there are dozens of versions of >>>> Python... I downloaded 6 or 7 >>>> Finally, one installed... (time is passing... no C sound .... no >>>> sound.... >>>> >>>> OK. >>>> >>>> Python is installed - not even sure what version - just whatever >>>> one would install... >>>> >>>> OK... >>>> >>>> Then... install Csound again. >>>> >>>> Hum??? Should I uninstall first to be on the safe side? >>>> Did I install 2 versions or one over the other? >>>> >>>> OK.... >>>> >>>> install Csound float >>>> >>>> YEAH... no dialog box complaining about Python... (maybe I got it) >>>> >>>> (((( Has it almost taken you 1 hour to read this email yet))))) >>>> - because I do know how cool Csound is.... I do know it's worth >>>> it.... but.... >>>> I am about ready to give up... >>>> >>>> Why? >>>> >>>> Welll ... in the csound folder is csound, winsound, csound5gui, >>>> blah blah blh.. - which door to I chose? >>>> >>>> I chose Csound... makes sense,,, I am installing Csound... >>>> >>>> terminal appears.... some text wizzes by.... terminal disappears.! >>>> >>>> OK... I try winSound.... >>>> >>>> - it doesn't make any sound? it needs an orc or sco and there >>>> are none to be found - and how would a beginner know that he >>>> needed them? >>>> >>>> And forget navigating to a folder - uuuuggggghhhh I can't find >>>> the desktop at alll.... >>>> >>>> OK... so I try csound5gui... oh this is a little better ... >>>> looks like a transport here and an editor.... >>>> >>>> BUT where are the orchestras? >>>> >>>> So.... NO SOUND..... well... in my mind Csound is the most >>>> amazing synth... but not in my speakers! >>>> >>>> So.... I had heard that QuteSound was the way to work with >>>> Csound.... >>>> >>>> launch the version I installed >>>> >>>> NOPE... seems I installed the double version of QuteCsound - and >>>> (and why has it got the name Csound in it ... if there is NO >>>> Csound in it... >>>> It's a cute launcher, quteHost... QuteWrapper ???? >>>> >>>> Just confused.... >>>> >>>> So, I install another version o QuteCsound - and >>>> >>>> It launches - AMAZING... >>>> >>>> but where is the sound???? >>>> >>>> Oh wait there is a menu - with examples.... - I go to one, I >>>> select it... I push on the transport... >>>> >>>> NOPE - wrong Audio Driver Wrong Hardware Setup.... >>>> >>>> I choose the right hardware setup >>>> >>>> I click on the transport................ >>>> >>>> >>>> Sound!!!!!! SOUND!!!!!! (CRAPPY CRAPPPYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPY sound >>>> - because this is a PC laptop my brother gave me - (I'm a mac guy >>>> you see) >>>> AN Expert actually >>>> >>>> And I am setting it up for him..... he's taking this class at >>>> Berklee with the Dr. B. guy.... >>>> >>>> Well.... How would I know, as a beginner... to get rid of all >>>> that chatter and breakup in the audio, I would need to set the -B >>>> and -b and check the boxes so that >>>> it uses the large number???? >>>> >>>> >>>> I am happy now.... It took ME more than 2 hours.... no >>>> lie... ..... >>>> >>>> It might take you less... and if you are lucky and you choose >>>> wisely... >>>> (True...I am a bit sleepy.... I have been working 18-20 hours per >>>> day on The Audio Programming Book - which I am delivering to MIT >>>> Press in 10 days (waiting for the foreword from Max Mathews - and >>>> tweeking things here and there........ and it's AMAZING!!!!! - >>>> with a lot of Csound in there too! - plus..... MusicV (a working >>>> version for all platforms! - a gift from Max Mathews) >>>> plus (cmusic - workin version for all platforms! a gift from F. >>>> Richard Moore) .... and of course..... >>>> >>>> And by the way.......... when I get it running.......... Where >>>> are the cool sounds! >>>> >>>> I know where they are - the Csound Catalog, cSounds.com, Csound >>>> Book, Csound Journal, etc.... but.... will a beginner know where >>>> to go... and what to do.... >>>> >>>> after ALL this, I am afraid that a PRO - a colleage from Berklee >>>> let's say.... blows off his family time on Sunday night - and >>>> after 2 hours.... >>>> Toot 1 - a sine wave........................ >>>> >>>> Sorry... >>>> >>>> EMPTY TRASH >>>> >>>> UNINSTALL >>>> >>>> MOVE ON.... >>>> >>>> -dB >>>> >>>> a "nightmare to install for beginners" (or PROFESSIONALS >>>> especially) version of Csound5 for Windows!! >>>> uuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fran, >>>>> I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that >>>>> suits you. And that you enjoy using it. >>>>> Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. >>>>> >>>>> Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I >>>>> think it is best not to confuse them. >>>>> >>>>> D >>>>> On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i >>>>>> work with a pc >>>>>> windows (xp-vista), >>>>>> and i never had problems. I have installed many different >>>>>> versions, and both >>>>>> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, >>>>>> but always >>>>>> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >>>>>> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with >>>>>> a great help >>>>>> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would >>>>>> be really a >>>>>> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >>>>>> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more >>>>>> experienced >>>>>> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I >>>>>> suppose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >>>>>> >>>>>> ciao, and thanks for all, >>>>>> >>>>>> fran. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >>>>>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at >>>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>>>>> "unsubscribe csound" >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________________ >>>>> David Worrall. >>>>> - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au >>>>> - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au >>>>> - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>>>> "unsubscribe csound" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>>> "unsubscribe csound" >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body >> "unsubscribe csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-06 14:43 |
From | mark jamerson |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
As a relatively recent (a few years) beginner to the realm of Csound, I would like to make a suggestion regarding the csounds.com website issue that Dr. B brings up. I agree with his discovery that the first page is not exactly aimed at the beginner. I think it might help to have some sort of "Get Started With Csound" link that is highly visible. The link would then go to a page that has links to one version of Csound for each OS, and one version of Python. I think we should restrict the beginner's choice as much as possible. Take out the choice of float or double, and let them make that choice when they are more familiar with the world of csound. I also think that the Csound we offer to beginner's should be the core Csound that has recently been discussed( This could also eliminate the need for python) . Something like a demo version, with a note telling the beginner that they can get more out of Csound later if they choose. I also think the beginner version of Csound should include QuteCsound (The appropriate version to match the only Csound we offer them). I only recently checked out QuteCsound, and I think it is highly accessible and user-friendly. I never found that with winsound or csound5gui, and wound up using WinXound instead. Basically my main point is that I think we need to create a portal for the beginners to be funnelled through that is limited in scope so as not to confuse them in the beginning. Mark ----- Original Message ---- From: Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2009-07-06 15:26 |
From | David Horowitz |
Subject | [Csnd] Advice sought on your book versus catalog. |
Dear Dr. B.
I am moderately new to CSound but making excellent progress.
I have decided to purchase your book but I have a question:
Does the book contain the same materials as the catalog or are they different?
The materials on the web dont make clear whether the book comes with the catalog and Barnes and Noble says the book comes with 3000 instruments. If it does does the catalog contain different instruments?
By way of mention, in the 80s I was in Barry Vercoe's program on music perception and computer music at MIT. I am excited to be back in the field again and using my training. I am CTO of a new company in computer music and I live in London.
Many thanks
David Horowitz
| |
|
Date | 2009-07-06 16:07 |
From | Michael Bechard |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
f1 0 1024 10 1 0 ... instr 1 aout oscili 25000, 440, 1 outs aout, aout endin ... i1 0 4 Not too bad, is it? Intuitive, no, but that's four lines of code and a few simple concepts. Gets even easier with a frontend. Some (not much) of CSound *is* easy, and some of it *could* be. Installation certainly falls into the latter category. I agree with Dr. B. that it should be easy for a new user to download and install CSound, and then *intuitively* explore, compile, and hear the results of any number of examples. This is almost impossible without a frontend, and is why I'm all for bundling CSound with something that breaks the ice for a new user. The more familiar and intuitive, the better. Bundling some toots in to, say, the help menu would be even better. In Windows, Ideally: 1. Run install package, no hickups. 2. Go to Program menu, click on CSound Editor shortcut 3. immediately get intro dialog box explaining where example examples are, or asking if they want them opened. 4. One-click to compile and listen to csd. Learning all the nuances and details of what CSound has to offer will always be a learning experience for a new user, and will require effort and patience on their part. I just hate to think that, on top of having to learn CSound, they have to wrestle with unrelated issues like Python compatability, trying to find easy examples on the net, etc. Michael Bechard ----- Original Message ---- From: Julian Peterson |
Date | 2009-07-06 18:56 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Mark, Thanks for this suggestion and reminder. Back in the day, we had a beginners menu at cSounds.com that had links to a nice set of basics... Still not sure there was a simple windows build, but... it was helpful for sure - I will work at remaking that page again... -dB Dr. Richard Boulanger - rboulanger@berklee.edu On Jul 6, 2009, at 9:43 AM, mark jamerson wrote: > > > > As a relatively recent (a few years) beginner to the realm of > Csound, I would like to make a suggestion regarding the csounds.com > website issue that Dr. B brings up. I agree with his discovery that > the first page is not exactly aimed at the beginner. I think it > might help to have some sort of "Get Started With Csound" link that > is highly visible. The link would then go to a page that has links > to one version of Csound for each OS, and one version of Python. I > think we should restrict the beginner's choice as much as possible. > Take out the choice of float or double, and let them make that > choice when they are more familiar with the world of csound. I also > think that the Csound we offer to beginner's should be the core > Csound that has recently been discussed( This could also eliminate > the need for python) . Something like a demo version, with a note > telling the beginner that they can get more out of Csound later if > they choose. I also think > the beginner version of Csound should include QuteCsound (The > appropriate version to match the only Csound we offer them). I only > recently checked out QuteCsound, and I think it is highly accessible > and user-friendly. I never found that with winsound or csound5gui, > and wound up using WinXound instead. > > Basically my main point is that I think we need to create a > portal for the beginners to be funnelled through that is limited in > scope so as not to confuse them in the beginning. > > Mark > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2009-07-06 20:17 |
From | Aidan Collins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
just a thought, and sorry if it's impractical, I'm not a developer by any means..... but would it be possible to make an "installation wizard" of the annoying sort prevalent in older Windows OS's? Something that would walk you through the various variables and paths that would need to be set by asking you a series of questions? That way you wouldn't have to make an installer that could figure out these things for itself, just know enough to ask the right questions.... For example, "what audio output device do you want to use?" "where is importantlibrary.lib?" etc. etc. A On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2009-07-06 20:38 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
This is indeed possible but I do not think the people who want a better installer would find it satisfactory. That includes me. What I have in mind right now is the current installer with some check boxes for what parts of Csound you want to install. The default would be the "core" version people are talking about, but you could enable Python, Java, Lua, etc. Regards, Mike On 7/6/09, Aidan Collins |
Date | 2009-07-07 00:57 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Sounds like a good (great) strategy. Include QuteCsound as one of the options too. Sent from my Arp 2600 ;-) On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Michael Gogins |
Date | 2009-07-07 03:42 |
From | Mike Moser-Booth |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound |
Julian Peterson wrote: > Here's the reality of the situation: csound is a programming > language. It's a great programming language, one we're all devoted > to, and one which we all rightfully believe is one of the most > powerful ever imagined for music and sound production. ... > csound will never be easy. > > Yours, > > Julian Peterson > First off, I just want to mention that this isn't directed to you specifically, Julian, but I've seen similar arguments like this come up with regards to the current discussion and would like to make a quick response to them. I don't think it's a good idea to just accept that Csound is hard, and that's just the way it is. Of course Csound will never be *easy* per se, but it could definitely be *easier*, and I think that's all that this discussion is really about. Powerful programs lose their power if people can't use them. The audience for Csound isn't--or at least shouldn't be--just computer programmers. The audience is musicians. True, more technically savvy musicians, but still musicians. Yes, the learning curve is steep, but that curve could be leveed by simplifying those aspects that have not business being difficult, such as musician friendly terminology in the manual as Jason Adams suggested, accessible tutorials for new users, a standard bundled frontend (QuteCsound) that uses a modern interface (because seriously, hardly anyone uses the commandline any more, especially Windows users), and an easy install. Installing should not be part of the learning curve. .mmb |
Date | 2009-07-07 10:47 |
From | Stéphane Rollandin |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound |
> Installing should not be part of the learning curve. definitely. Stef |
Date | 2009-07-08 17:35 |
From | ze luis |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
Yes, I do agree with Mark on this. I'm a Mac user, and I did had some troubles installing qutecsound (no problems at all with Csound 5.10) but beeing a teacher, and most of my students use XP or Vista, it has been a pain to correctly instal csound 5.10 and, for example Qutecsound! - it doesn't have to be necessarely a simpler installer - but it should have a link or something to a step by step/ how to From: mark jamerson <bass_pilot@yahoo.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 2:43:43 PM Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API As a relatively recent (a few years) beginner to the realm of Csound, I would like to make a suggestion regarding the csounds.com website issue that Dr. B brings up. I agree with his discovery that the first page is not exactly aimed at the beginner. I think it might help to have some sort of "Get Started With Csound" link that is highly visible. The link would then go to a page that has links to one version of Csound for each OS, and one version of Python. I think we should restrict the beginner's choice as much as possible. Take out the choice of float or double, and let them make that choice when they are more familiar with the world of csound. I also think that the Csound we offer to beginner's should be the core Csound that has recently been discussed( This could also eliminate the need for python) . Something like a demo version, with a note telling the beginner that they can get more out of Csound later if they choose. I also think the beginner version of Csound should include QuteCsound (The appropriate version to match the only Csound we offer them). I only recently checked out QuteCsound, and I think it is highly accessible and user-friendly. I never found that with winsound or csound5gui, and wound up using WinXound instead. Basically my main point is that I think we need to create a portal for the beginners to be funnelled through that is limited in scope so as not to confuse them in the beginning. Mark ----- Original Message ---- From: Dr. Richard Boulanger <richardboulanger@comcast.net> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2009 11:07:59 PM Subject: [Csnd] Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API OK. On a clean XP machine, I tried to be a new user and get the latest version of Csound running. So... like a pro who doesn't know, but hears it's the bomb.... After an hour of trial and error, and hunt and hope, i finally got it running! (with QuteCsound as the frontEnd) No way would a beginner (or worse - a seasoned pro - put up with this) Here's what happens Go to cSounds.com to find *almost everything Csound* First thing in the news is QuteCsound. ? what's that ? Not sure I want something that's Cute? I want to make some serious BEATS!!!! MAN.... But OK... maybe they call Csound Cute Csound now.... Go to download Hummmm... there are 2 versions Double and Float??? Hummmm - I use Logic Pro and Ableton Live and Audacity - and they have never asked me about double or float. OK - I will download both I will install one - doesn't work - not too cute I install the other - oesn't work - not cute at ALL... But wait... Back to cSounds.com... Oh.. there's a download tab/link,,, Ah.. here I find Canonical Csound5 - ALL PLATFORMS - cool, but what does canonical mean? build in echo? No commercial software uses this term - and I have EVERY commercial program on my PC! (i even paid for 1 of them) Csound Page at Sourceforge - what? what's sourceforge.. OK... I go.... Download the latest Csound5.10 for Windows (a binary? what's that? I never got the Reason 4.0 *binary* Worse... again 4 versions 5.9, 5,10 f, d, huh? - but which version float or double? Install Now here's where the fun begins (and beginners GIVE UP) (if they haven't already) - Dialog appears... you don't have Python ? What? I want Csound? but it says.... you can keep installing... great. Keep installing then... what do I click on to run Csound - why not try csound.... NOPE... doesn't run without Python... Then why the @!!@$#@%$#@!# did you let me install it if it won't run without python? Maybe it does... Now to find Python? And this is not easy... there are dozens of versions of Python... I downloaded 6 or 7 Finally, one installed... (time is passing... no C sound .... no sound.... OK. Python is installed - not even sure what version - just whatever one would install... OK... Then... install Csound again. Hum??? Should I uninstall first to be on the safe side? Did I install 2 versions or one over the other? OK.... install Csound float YEAH... no dialog box complaining about Python... (maybe I got it) (((( Has it almost taken you 1 hour to read this email yet))))) - because I do know how cool Csound is.... I do know it's worth it.... but.... I am about ready to give up... Why? Welll ... in the csound folder is csound, winsound, csound5gui, blah blah blh.. - which door to I chose? I chose Csound... makes sense,,, I am installing Csound... terminal appears.... some text wizzes by.... terminal disappears.! OK... I try winSound.... - it doesn't make any sound? it needs an orc or sco and there are none to be found - and how would a beginner know that he needed them? And forget navigating to a folder - uuuuggggghhhh I can't find the desktop at alll.... OK... so I try csound5gui... oh this is a little better ... looks like a transport here and an editor.... BUT where are the orchestras? So.... NO SOUND..... well... in my mind Csound is the most amazing synth... but not in my speakers! So.... I had heard that QuteSound was the way to work with Csound.... launch the version I installed NOPE... seems I installed the double version of QuteCsound - and (and why has it got the name Csound in it ... if there is NO Csound in it... It's a cute launcher, quteHost... QuteWrapper ???? Just confused.... So, I install another version o QuteCsound - and It launches - AMAZING... but where is the sound???? Oh wait there is a menu - with examples.... - I go to one, I select it... I push on the transport... NOPE - wrong Audio Driver Wrong Hardware Setup.... I choose the right hardware setup I click on the transport................ Sound!!!!!! SOUND!!!!!! (CRAPPY CRAPPPYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPY sound - because this is a PC laptop my brother gave me - (I'm a mac guy you see) AN Expert actually And I am setting it up for him..... he's taking this class at Berklee with the Dr. B. guy.... Well.... How would I know, as a beginner... to get rid of all that chatter and breakup in the audio, I would need to set the -B and -b and check the boxes so that it uses the large number???? I am happy now.... It took ME more than 2 hours.... no lie... ..... It might take you less... and if you are lucky and you choose wisely... (True...I am a bit sleepy.... I have been working 18-20 hours per day on The Audio Programming Book - which I am delivering to MIT Press in 10 days (waiting for the foreword from Max Mathews - and tweeking things here and there........ and it's AMAZING!!!!! - with a lot of Csound in there too! - plus..... MusicV (a working version for all platforms! - a gift from Max Mathews) plus (cmusic - workin version for all platforms! a gift from F. Richard Moore) .... and of course..... And by the way.......... when I get it running.......... Where are the cool sounds! I know where they are - the Csound Catalog, cSounds.com, Csound Book, Csound Journal, etc.... but.... will a beginner know where to go... and what to do.... after ALL this, I am afraid that a PRO - a colleage from Berklee let's say.... blows off his family time on Sunday night - and after 2 hours.... Toot 1 - a sine wave........................ Sorry... EMPTY TRASH UNINSTALL MOVE ON.... -dB a "nightmare to install for beginners" (or PROFESSIONALS especially) version of Csound5 for Windows!! uuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhh On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:10 PM, DavidW wrote: > Fran, > I am pleased that you don't have problems doing an install that suits you. And that you enjoy using it. > Thus, the difficulties we are discussing need not concern you. > > Bbuild difficulties and usage difficulties are different - I think it is best not to confuse them. > > D > On 03/07/2009, at 8:55 AM, francibal wrote: > >> >> Dear all, >> I'm a beginner, and i have no knowledge in programming, but i work with a pc >> windows (xp-vista), >> and i never had problems. I have installed many different versions, and both >> float and double, and many times i have disinstalled and again, but always >> it were all ok. And i'm not so able with a pc. >> Csound is not so easy at begin, but with a little bit (and with a great help >> from You), one can understand how to work. A new frontend would be really a >> pleasure. I use scite(!), and i'm studying emacs >> (thanks Mr Rollandin!), and for me it is sufficient. Maybe more experienced >> users, like most of You, have some differents problems, I suppose. >> >> Only for report, from a lovers of csound, >> >> ciao, and thanks for all, >> >> fran. >> --View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Score-Alignment-Utility-tp24227460p24315191.html >> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > > ________________________________________________ > David Worrall. > - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au > - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au > - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au > > > > > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2009-07-09 12:56 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: WE Desperately NEED a Simple Installer/Build for Windowswith QuteCsound (was: Building Python API |
I would be happy to work at getting those pages back in place at cSounds.com - for all platforms. (And I would be happy to have the help of a windows person.... a mac person... and a linux person... to get me the documents and links that would work best.) There is already a section at SourceForge with lots of info - would that ALSO be the place for THIS info. The Getting Started - Pages (and maybe in the manual too?) -dB On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:35 PM, ze luis wrote:
|