|
Hi Mr. Alexandros,
I think that Mr. Hunkins is right (He is an expert csounders). Maybe You can
try csound 5.10 (is it possible?). I don't know if this is related or if i'm
speeking about sheeps, but i've read this in what's new in version 5.10:
"Time now counted internally in samples, overcoming a longstanding bug with
rounding of time
to k-rate."
I'm a beginner!
ciao,
fran
Art Hunkins wrote:
>
> Sounds like a bug in seed (or related random selector).
>
> Art Hunkins
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexandros Droseltis"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 6:57 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: same seed
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:50 -0700, francibal wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mr. Alexander,
>>> i've tryed your examples and work well. I'm on vista with csound 5.10,
>>> but i
>>> don't believe this is important in this case. Are you sure that was same
>>> seed value ?
>>
>> Hello, francibal. Yes, I am sure. I change the seed to 1061022902 and
>> csound used 1061022912. I can't explain why. And not only in this case;
>> any time I set the seed to a prefered value, csound uses a value that
>> differs and thus produces a different trajectory.
>>
>> Thanks for your answer
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Alexandros
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/same-seed-tp24569211p24583400.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|